<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Recruiting stars translating to NFL Success]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This topic was started but after searching through 6 pages couldn't find it so I decided to post this for the orgiinal poster.</p>

<p>
The first two rounds of last years draft only had 10 "5 star" recruits according to Scout - 16%.</p>
<p>
Only 8 were "4 stars" - 13%.</p>
<p>
15 were "3 stars" - 23%.</p>
<p>
25 were "2 stars" - 39%.</p>
<p>
and 6 snuck in with 1 measly star to there credit - 9%.</p>
<p>
That's 71% with 3 stars or less!!!!!</p>

<p>
The "experts" nailed the QB and RB positions, while DT is completely unpredictable, at least for this small sample.</p>

<p>
I know that the sample size is minuscule, and therefore subject to debate, but I found this to be interesting.</p>
<p>
Sorry for the whole new thread but couldn't find it.  I know this is only one year but didn't feel like researching much more.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/10036/recruiting-stars-translating-to-nfl-success</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:17:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/10036.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:49:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>