<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Responding to Scores]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that is important for a team is how the offense responds when the opposing team scores.  It is vital that they are able to respond with a score of their own...so that things don't get out of control.</p>

<p>So far, there have been 11 scores against the Browns.  Of those 11, it was POSSIBLE to respond on 10 (one FG ended the half).</p>

<p>Out of the 10 scores we COULD respond to, the Browns and BQ have responded with scores of our own on 6.  A fumble by K2 claimed another (we had a 1st on the opposing 38 if he hadn't so likely would have scored)....downs at the end of the game in Denver (1:24 to ge when we got the ball needing a TD)...and punted twice.</p>

<p>60% response is pretty good.  In fact, only 1x have we gone 3 and out following an opponents score (and 1x we fumbled on play #3....see K2 fumble).</p>

<p>That gives the D a chance to rest and regroup before taking the field again...and is crucial in stopping big scoring runs.  </p>

<p>I know that the D has struggled DESPITE THIS...but imagine what would be occurring without it!!!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/1008/responding-to-scores</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 01:57:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/1008.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:11:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Responding to Scores on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:43:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/damajuki" aria-label="Profile: damajuki">@<bdi>damajuki</bdi></a> <a href="/post/12941">said</a>:</p>John, awesome stats as usual.
<p>Scores are key but it would also be interesting to see how many drives went, let's say, 3 minutes or more after an opponent's score, even without us scoring.</p>

<p>The point is the same: letting the D breathe/regroup is key.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Vs Denver we responded with drives over 3 minutes after scores 4 out of 6 times...the other 2 were the fumble and the endo of the game (only 1:24 left)....so basically 4 out of 5 times.</p>

<p>Vs Buffalo we responded with drives over 3 minutes after scores only 1x, but scored on 2 others giving us a score on 3 out of the 4.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/12957</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/12957</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[WPB Dawg Fan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:43:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Responding to Scores on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:21:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>John, awesome stats as usual.</p>

<p>Scores are key but it would also be interesting to see how many drives went, let's say, 3 minutes or more after an opponent's score, even without us scoring.</p>

<p>The point is the same: letting the D breathe/regroup is key.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/12941</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/12941</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[damajuki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:21:50 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>