<![CDATA[Finding a new quarterback]]>Really interesting analysis on how teams have found their QBs......

Here's the article

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/10318/finding-a-new-quarterbackRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 10:04:57 GMTFri, 26 Feb 2010 17:58:41 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:19:11 GMT]]>Ken Dorsey only lost two games in his college career. He turned out to be a huge star on Sunday's, didn't he?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158257https://brownsboard.com/post/158257Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:19:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:00:30 GMT]]>

@cambridgeho said:

Espn.com is saying Sam Bradford has bulked up to 236lbs. I always thought he looked small and lanky, but 6'4" 236 is a big son of a bitch. I would not hate him as our qb, if he falls to 7, MH will find it hard to pass him up.

if he gets plowed to the ground on that shoulder of his, that means squat. too risky of a pick.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158247https://brownsboard.com/post/158247Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:00:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:09:31 GMT]]>maybe we could trade Mangini to the Jets for Sanchez.

straight up

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158227https://brownsboard.com/post/158227Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:09:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:39:12 GMT]]>Wining in College does not mean you win in the Pros. But using Peyton Manning is using an exception not a rule. That is no different than using Tom Brady as an example of what a 6th round pick can give you.

I didn't read the article but I seem to recall something like half the QBs are from the first round and the other half are from all other rounds. It is kind of a no brainer that people picked in the first round generally are better than those picked later. The question for the Browns would be if this is the time to go after a franchise QB, maybe if Bradford drops but otherwise no way. Bring in a veteran to START and keep BQ as the backup since he is the more affordable bad QB on the roster.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158121https://brownsboard.com/post/158121Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:39:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:14:43 GMT]]>What part don't I get Rich? How many big games did Peyton Manning win in college? Think Indy wants to trade the last 11 years with him as a starting QB? How about the national championships won by Toretta, Wurffle, Ward, Walsh, etc etc and how did their NFL careers turn out?

Winning in college does not guarentee NFL sucess.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158110https://brownsboard.com/post/158110Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:14:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:36:53 GMT]]>Some things never change............Mark and Riffer never got it...................

statistics say the opposite of their view....the numbers and results overwhelming support my conclusions

...........we been losing for years with all the wrong formulas........lets hope this mgt gets it finally

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158073https://brownsboard.com/post/158073Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:36:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:42:21 GMT]]>Espn.com is saying Sam Bradford has bulked up to 236lbs. I always thought he looked small and lanky, but 6'4" 236 is a big son of a bitch. I would not hate him as our qb, if he falls to 7, MH will find it hard to pass him up.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158069https://brownsboard.com/post/158069Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:42:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:15:40 GMT]]>

@riffer-x said:

College doesn't mean dick towards winning in the NFL nor do numbers really. I get tired of that argument and no da ich, that isn't a direct slam on you just my opinion.

I sort of agree with you. And, the author's conclusion was somewhat weak, but I thought that was intentional. He was saying, your best bet is a QB in the first round.....but there's HUGE risk. But, if you don't take a QB in the first round don't bother trying to outsmart everyone with a later round pick. Sometimes a late round pick works - but, chances are, you have to try to hit on several players before one works out.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158067https://brownsboard.com/post/158067Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:15:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:41:00 GMT]]>College doesn't mean dick towards winning in the NFL nor do numbers really. I get tired of that argument and no da ich, that isn't a direct slam on you just my opinion.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158055https://brownsboard.com/post/158055Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:41:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:38:04 GMT]]>Peyton Manning disproves the winning in college is important theory. For that matter, so does Gino Torretta, Steve Walsh, Charlie Ward, Danny Wurffle and many many others who won all the time in college and took a huge dump in the NFL.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158054https://brownsboard.com/post/158054Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:38:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Finding a new quarterback on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:40:34 GMT]]>The article was interesting. I thought his conclusion was extremely weak. The Key to winning in the NFL is a good offense and a franchise QB is prerequisite for a good offense. It has been proven over and over through the years that franchise QB's indeed come in the first round. Drew Brees lasted till round two because of the so called too short to small myopia. He talked about risk of drafting a QB with the one pick. Heck drafting at any other position is a huge risk as well with NOT nearly the upside in payoff.

Something the author missed completely was winning as well in college. Those that have the best chance of being franchise championship QB's were also huge winners in college. Ben Rothlisberger is an example.

Brady Quinn is an example of the guy who lost all his big games in college. That is why I never wanted to draft him. Further Cleveland needs to get a franchise QB because we have none.

Thanks for the good read! 🙄

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/158049https://brownsboard.com/post/158049Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:40:34 GMT