<![CDATA[Potential SS, FS tandem]]>This is probably a pipe dream but imagine if we get Berry with are 1st pick and Mays with the second. Berry could be playmaking/coverguy at FS and Mays can be the run support/intimidator at SS. I know alot of people are down on Mays but with Berry alongside him to handle coverage you can bring Mays up in the box to stop the run, cover tightends and knock people out running crossing routes an slants. I'll probably get chastized for this but I really think Mays brings the kinda physicallity we need in this division. He has a John Lynch mentality with Polamaulu's athletic ability and all yea...he ran a 4.24

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/10540/potential-ss-fs-tandemRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 20:04:32 GMTWed, 10 Mar 2010 02:51:13 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:07:43 GMT]]>

nmills said:

I would say safety is our biggest concern right now, Abe Elam's the only safety on the team and he's not great. Safety, CB, DL would be my biggest targets in the draft in that order

But with major concerns at DL, CB, WR, and QB, you don't use your two most important draft picks on the same position, especially Safety!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160503https://brownsboard.com/post/160503Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:07:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:31:06 GMT]]>

@thaak said:

That would be a ridiculous draft. Ridiculous as in stupid, not good.

We should NOT draft a safety in the top 10, even if it is Berry.

If we do make that mistake, drafting another safety with so many other concerns on the team, in the 2nd round, would be ludicrous.

I would say safety is our biggest concern right now, Abe Elam's the only safety on the team and he's not great. Safety, CB, DL would be my biggest targets in the draft in that order

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160478https://brownsboard.com/post/160478Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:31:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:28:42 GMT]]>Donte Whitner is an Ohio native who always wanted to play for the Browns... give the Bills a 3rd or 4th for him!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160426https://brownsboard.com/post/160426Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:28:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:20:21 GMT]]>I don't want Haden, he'll be just like McDonald getting beat even with a 10 yard cushion.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160421https://brownsboard.com/post/160421Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:20:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:10:35 GMT]]>

@thaak said:

That would be a ridiculous draft. Ridiculous as in stupid, not good.

We should NOT draft a safety in the top 10, even if it is Berry.

If we do make that mistake, drafting another safety with so many other concerns on the team, in the 2nd round, would be ludicrous.

I agree, that's why I think they'll trade out of the top 10 and get Earl Thomas or maybe even Haden a little later in the 1st.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160418https://brownsboard.com/post/160418Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:10:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:07:18 GMT]]>Does anybody realise we don't have a starting Free Safety.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160415https://brownsboard.com/post/160415Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:07:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:40:48 GMT]]>That would be a ridiculous draft. Ridiculous as in stupid, not good.

We should NOT draft a safety in the top 10, even if it is Berry.

If we do make that mistake, drafting another safety with so many other concerns on the team, in the 2nd round, would be ludicrous.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160303https://brownsboard.com/post/160303Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:40:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:05:45 GMT]]>

@skinny said:

Interesting idea. I really don't know where these guys are supposed to go in the draft though. Would be acceptable to me. Don't know if it would be my first choice.

Berry top 5, hopefully 7. Mays anywhere from mid 1st. to mid 2nd

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160255https://brownsboard.com/post/160255Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:05:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Potential SS, FS tandem on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:58:05 GMT]]>Interesting idea. I really don't know where these guys are supposed to go in the draft though. Would be acceptable to me. Don't know if it would be my first choice.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/160251https://brownsboard.com/post/160251Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:58:05 GMT