<![CDATA[Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings]]>OBR is reporting that these three ERFA's have resigned.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/10706/benard-constanzo-jenningsRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 11:39:51 GMTWed, 17 Mar 2010 16:32:08 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:51:07 GMT]]>

@choco said:

i believe costanzo had more tackles as a gunner than josh did....but, josh was only on teh field for about 75-80% special team plays. not making a comparison here....merely suggesting that costanzo continue to be a ST demon, and is very valuable in that role. it allows us the flexibility to use josh elsewhere without suffering greatly from is coverage.

jennings ran hard in the steeler game. he and davis are both young, and have good upside.

bernard may be the reason wimbley got shopped.

I think you're right about Benard/Wimbley. Why would the Browns pay 1st round money for Wimbley to sit on the bench when a guy like Benard is a bargain who outplays him? Start Benard & find a backup, although we have some depth NOW at LB.

Mike

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162974https://brownsboard.com/post/162974Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:51:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:25:41 GMT]]>

@sisky-fringo said:

resigned?!? OH NO! seriously?

oh...wait, you meant "re-signed".

phew! great news.

I believe it was Mike Golic who made the same mistake about Colin Powell.

He read that Powell had "resigned" as Secretery of State, and asked "how many more years did he "re-sign" for?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162922https://brownsboard.com/post/162922Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:25:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:23:12 GMT]]>What do the cast of characters from Seinfeld have to do with the Browns?

(or is this their law firm?)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162921https://brownsboard.com/post/162921Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:23:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:42:16 GMT]]>

@choco said:

bernard may be the reason wimbley got shopped.

I really think Bernard was a big part of Wimbley being let go. They saw/see something -perhaps a hunger?- that Wimbley didn't have. Mangini is nutso about people he can coach up and this kid in a short time has grown significantly.

Great move to bring all these guys back. Talented depth is always a plus.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162910https://brownsboard.com/post/162910Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:42:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:58:16 GMT]]>i believe costanzo had more tackles as a gunner than josh did....but, josh was only on teh field for about 75-80% special team plays. not making a comparison here....merely suggesting that costanzo continue to be a ST demon, and is very valuable in that role. it allows us the flexibility to use josh elsewhere without suffering greatly from is coverage.

jennings ran hard in the steeler game. he and davis are both young, and have good upside.

bernard may be the reason wimbley got shopped.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162890https://brownsboard.com/post/162890Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:58:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:43:09 GMT]]>

@thaak said:

Dude, a duck could blow its nose up a bear's ass, and you'd think it was a sign that Harrison is going to be traded.

If said duck was a young RB that was re-signed, and by "blow his nose" you mean that he was on the trade block this time last week, and the bear was a 2nd round tender on a guy who I'm not convinced is a 300 carry a year back, yes, I would take that as a sign.

It's all speculation Thaak. All I'm saying is that if I were in charge, I see the market value for him being higher than it will ever be and a team in the midst of a roster purge. Granted, we have since acquired even more picks since he was originally reported to be on the block; he may be getting shopped for a player rather than a pick at this point.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162886https://brownsboard.com/post/162886Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:43:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:27:33 GMT]]>There is a lot of potential in Benard. I think Jennings and Constanzo are both benificial players to have, but would rather have Benard over both.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162876https://brownsboard.com/post/162876Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:27:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:07:36 GMT]]>

@mopaji said:

I really believe Harrison is gonna be moved and this kinda strengthens that belief. I like all 3 of these guys though and it is great to be getting younger AND better at the same time.

Dude, a duck could blow its nose up a bear's ass, and you'd think it was a sign that Harrison is going to be traded.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162873https://brownsboard.com/post/162873Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:07:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:55:36 GMT]]>resigned?!? OH NO! seriously?

oh...wait, you meant "re-signed".

phew! great news.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162829https://brownsboard.com/post/162829Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:55:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:10:06 GMT]]>I really believe Harrison is gonna be moved and this kinda strengthens that belief. I like all 3 of these guys though and it is great to be getting younger AND better at the same time.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162779https://brownsboard.com/post/162779Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:10:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:46:40 GMT]]>Christmas in March with all the recent news!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162775https://brownsboard.com/post/162775Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:46:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:34:48 GMT]]>

@thaak said:

OBR is reporting that these three ERFA's have resigned.

I hope that is accurate. All are worth keeping.

I think Benard can be outstanding!

Mike

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162772https://brownsboard.com/post/162772Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:34:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Benard, Constanzo, & Jennings on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:42:30 GMT]]>very nice!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/162682https://brownsboard.com/post/162682Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:42:30 GMT