<![CDATA[Possibility of 2 QB's?]]>Has anyone considered that with 12 picks (assuming we don't trade some away) that perhaps we'll spend a late round pick on a QB in addition to an early rounder?

This is what the Packers did with Flynn and Brohm a couple of years ago to maximize their chances of finding a backup for Aaron Rodgers.

You could then wind up with a duo like Tony Pike and, say, Matt Nichols.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/10773/possibility-of-2-qb-sRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 11:33:16 GMTSun, 21 Mar 2010 01:10:35 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:59:18 GMT]]>

@gips said:

.april 22 cant come soon enough..

No sense wishing your life away.

The schedule will be released maybe a week or so before that, so for me at least, that provides some excitement as I start planning my trips to Cleveland.

At least once that is done, I can look at the calendar with anticipation.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163519https://brownsboard.com/post/163519Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:59:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:42:59 GMT]]>I only see us taking one QB n this draft likely in the second or third round due to all the attention being given to tebow i suspect its a smokescreen holmy has his eyes set on someone else and isnt drawing a crowd of doubters,he may like pike or le-fart..however tebow has shown a lot of what holmy likes to see in a qb so who knows...april 22 cant come soon enough..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163451https://brownsboard.com/post/163451Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:42:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:30:04 GMT]]>I don't see two QBs in this draft, but I do think we will snag one this year and then draft another one next year. And by that I mean a third-rounder or sooner in both years.

Remember, Holmgren has a QB fetish. It's almost like a tech toy for him. By the next year, you've found the latest, greatest thing and you have to get your hands on it.

I'm thinking Tebow this year and who knows next year.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163446https://brownsboard.com/post/163446Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:30:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:02:04 GMT]]>

@ballpeen said:

I think since we just signed 2 qbs in FA, the chances are pretty slim. One would assume neither Jake or Wallace is going to get cut, so that gives you 4 qbs...I don't see the point. Drafted qbs who get put on practice squads stand a strong possibility of getting picked up.

The first place a team looks if a qb gets hurt or falls out of favor is the practice squad list.

Ditto, I was for drafting two until the signings.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163444https://brownsboard.com/post/163444Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:02:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:07:00 GMT]]>

@earl34 said:

Has anyone considered that with 12 picks (assuming we don't trade some away) that perhaps we'll spend a late round pick on a QB in addition to an early rounder?

This is what the Packers did with Flynn and Brohm a couple of years ago to maximize their chances of finding a backup for Aaron Rodgers.

You could then wind up with a duo like Tony Pike and, say, Matt Nichols.

I think since we just signed 2 qbs in FA, the chances are pretty slim. One would assume neither Jake or Wallace is going to get cut, so that gives you 4 qbs...I don't see the point. Drafted qbs who get put on practice squads stand a strong possibility of getting picked up.

The first place a team looks if a qb gets hurt or falls out of favor is the practice squad list.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163424https://brownsboard.com/post/163424Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:07:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:29:13 GMT]]>

@alo said:

Too bad this guy's is the only one who knows anything here

yes i agree

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163420https://brownsboard.com/post/163420Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:29:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:18:46 GMT]]>Too bad this guy's besmirching the good reputation of WVBrownsfan.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163419https://brownsboard.com/post/163419Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:18:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:16:23 GMT]]>

@earl34 said:

No but you're quite the negative person. "D-bag"? Oh, you're so mature there in West Virginia.

cant help it you dont like facts

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163417https://brownsboard.com/post/163417Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:16:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:04:49 GMT]]>earl, he joined these boards just to troll and start arguments, don't feed him. your giving him just what he wants

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163414https://brownsboard.com/post/163414Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:04:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:48:16 GMT]]>I've thought a 3rd & 6th or 7th quite possible, with one going to the practice squad come last fall cut.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163411https://brownsboard.com/post/163411Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:48:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:36:12 GMT]]>

@wvubrownsfan said:

i never said anything about them not taking another if they took one earlier mr. D-Bag

No but you're quite the negative person. "D-bag"? Oh, you're so mature there in West Virginia.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163408https://brownsboard.com/post/163408Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:36:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:39:59 GMT]]>

@earl34 said:

OK, Mr. Contrarian....

You could have "Early Round QB A" and "Late Rounder QB 3". Not showing interest in a QB is not a sign of not having any. I just used Pike as an example.

i never said anything about them not taking another if they took one earlier mr. D-Bag

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163403https://brownsboard.com/post/163403Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:39:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:39:27 GMT]]>posting it three times does prove your point on liking the QB's. I dont know much about Skelton, but he does have good size. If Robinson can put on a few lbs then I think he could do very well. He could be one of those over looked QB's that kick ass in the pro's.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163402https://brownsboard.com/post/163402Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:39:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:35:47 GMT]]>my favorite qbs in this draft are Zac Robinson and Skelton but Skelton will go alot higher then he shoud because of his size and arm strength. If we can get either in the lower 4th round Id be happy they are both projects but have really good potential

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163397https://brownsboard.com/post/163397Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:35:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:33:10 GMT]]>my favorite qbs in this draft are Zac Robinson and Skelton but Skelton will go alot higher then he shoud because of his size and arm strength. If we can get either in the lower 4th round Id be happy they are both projects but have really good potential

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163396https://brownsboard.com/post/163396Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:33:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:32:05 GMT]]>my favorite qbs in this draft are Zac Robinson and Skelton but Skelton will go alot higher then he shoud because of his size and arm strength. If we can get either in the lower 4th round Id be happy they are both projects but have really good potential

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163395https://brownsboard.com/post/163395Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:32:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:31:03 GMT]]>

@earl34 said:

Has anyone considered that with 12 picks (assuming we don't trade some away) that perhaps we'll spend a late round pick on a QB in addition to an early rounder?

This is what the Packers did with Flynn and Brohm a couple of years ago to maximize their chances of finding a backup for Aaron Rodgers.

You could then wind up with a duo like Tony Pike and, say, Matt Nichols.

You got that idea from my wonderful mock didn't ya. J/J but yea I obviously agree with ya

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163394https://brownsboard.com/post/163394Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:31:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:25:36 GMT]]>

@alo said:

Makes sense, Earl, especially when you think of how Mangini kept 4 QBs on the 53 man during his final year with the Jets.

True. It was initially going to be Pennington, Clemens and Ratliff. They tried to protect Ainge. Then Favre happened.

I think you'll see Holmgren looking for QB talent most years even if he has a starter.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163392https://brownsboard.com/post/163392Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:25:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:20:52 GMT]]>Makes sense, Earl, especially when you think of how Mangini kept 4 QBs on the 53 man during his final year with the Jets.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163390https://brownsboard.com/post/163390Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:20:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:20:18 GMT]]>

@wvubrownsfan said:

from what i've heard the browns have shown zero interest whatsoever in Pike

OK, Mr. Contrarian....

You could have "Early Round QB A" and "Late Rounder QB 3". Not showing interest in a QB is not a sign of not having any. I just used Pike as an example.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163389https://brownsboard.com/post/163389Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:20:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Possibility of 2 QB's? on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:15:43 GMT]]>

@earl34 said:

Has anyone considered that with 12 picks (assuming we don't trade some away) that perhaps we'll spend a late round pick on a QB in addition to an early rounder?

This is what the Packers did with Flynn and Brohm a couple of years ago to maximize their chances of finding a backup for Aaron Rodgers.

You could then wind up with a duo like Tony Pike and, say, Matt Nichols.

from what i've heard the browns have shown zero interest whatsoever in Pike

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/163388https://brownsboard.com/post/163388Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:15:43 GMT