<![CDATA[New numbers...17 for Delhomme]]>Well, I was hoping I wouldnt see that number for a while...lol. Its only a number, but Sipe wore it pretty good. Looks like Delhomme has some big shoes to fill

Delhomme - #17

Fujita - # 51

Hillis - # 28

Pashos - # 79

Watson - # 82

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/11053/new-numbers...17-for-delhommeRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 14:44:55 GMTThu, 08 Apr 2010 00:11:50 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:03:53 GMT]]>

@supersteelers said:

Yea, Sipe was special....Red Right 88

More special than #7 is for you right now....Sexual Assault

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166770https://brownsboard.com/post/166770Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:03:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:54:32 GMT]]>wallace, brown, and gocong as still not yet assigned.

According to wikipedia, Hillis is now 28 and James Davis is changed to 21

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166734https://brownsboard.com/post/166734Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:54:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:58:48 GMT]]>

@ballpeen said:

51....Dale Lindsey, Eddie Johnson.....good players

28.....Ben Davis is all I can remember

79....Bob Gain and Bob Golic wore 79

82....Tommy James, Ozzie, and Jim Houston all wore 82

How about Herman Fontenot and Leigh Bodden (#28)?

How about Steve Heiden (#82)?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166610https://brownsboard.com/post/166610Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:58:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:40:58 GMT]]>

@jrex223 said:

Well, I was hoping I wouldnt see that number for a while...lol. Its only a number, but Sipe wore it pretty good. Looks like Delhomme has some big shoes to fill

Delhomme - #17

Fujita - # 51

Hillis - # 28

Pashos - # 79

Watson - # 82

What number did Delhomme wear in Carolina?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166603https://brownsboard.com/post/166603Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:40:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:39:53 GMT]]>

@supersteelers said:

Yea, Sipe was special....Red Right 88

He was. That was just one play.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166602https://brownsboard.com/post/166602Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:39:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:18:50 GMT]]>Eddie Johnson is a class guy.

As far as delhome wearing 17, I can only hope he wont drop the ball as many times as BE did.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166558https://brownsboard.com/post/166558Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:18:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:53:19 GMT]]>

@jrex223 said:

Well, I was hoping I wouldnt see that number for a while...lol. Its only a number, but Sipe wore it pretty good. Looks like Delhomme has some big shoes to fill

Delhomme - #17

Fujita - # 51

Hillis - # 28

Pashos - # 79

Watson - # 82

51....Dale Lindsey, Eddie Johnson.....good players

28.....Ben Davis is all I can remember

79....Bob Gain and Bob Golic wore 79

82....Tommy James, Ozzie, and Jim Houston all wore 82

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166547https://brownsboard.com/post/166547Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:53:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:30:58 GMT]]>Yea, Sipe was special....Red Right 88

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166541https://brownsboard.com/post/166541Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:30:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:26:00 GMT]]>Well lets just hope that this 17 is a lot better than 17 we had last year

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166539https://brownsboard.com/post/166539Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:26:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:17:58 GMT]]>Hillis should be 36.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166535https://brownsboard.com/post/166535Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:17:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:24:12 GMT]]>Looks like he took Brodney's number, hes #21 now...

Im just looking at the browns roster off their website

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166523https://brownsboard.com/post/166523Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:24:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to New numbers...17 for Delhomme on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:19:15 GMT]]>

@jrex223 said:

Well, I was hoping I wouldnt see that number for a while...lol. Its only a number, but Sipe wore it pretty good. Looks like Delhomme has some big shoes to fill

Delhomme - #17

Fujita - # 51

Hillis - # 28

Pashos - # 79

Watson - # 82

doesn't James Davis wear 28 ?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/166521https://brownsboard.com/post/166521Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:19:15 GMT