<![CDATA[Interesting Mock]]>http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/sc-sp...4979,full.story]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/11088/interesting-mockRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 08:05:55 GMTSat, 10 Apr 2010 22:56:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:29:17 GMT]]>

@jasont44094 said:

There's a good chance Clausen drops into the 2nd round. Moving the Chains has us taking him in the 2nd over McCoy which I think is dumb. Anyways Cabbage Brains is a horrible reporter.

I am not huge on Claussen personally, but I wouldn't mind the gamble in the second round. Especially if we trade down a few slots in the first and get a second second rounder. I doubt he falls into round 2 though. The only way I see him slipping into the second is if Buffalo passes and someones gamble on tebow in the first. Its going to be an interesting draft to say the least.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167126https://brownsboard.com/post/167126Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:29:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:09:19 GMT]]>There's a good chance Clausen drops into the 2nd round. Moving the Chains has us taking him in the 2nd over McCoy which I think is dumb. Anyways Cabbage Brains is a horrible reporter.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167119https://brownsboard.com/post/167119Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:09:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:28:29 GMT]]>Picking Clausen means that signing Delhomme was a waste. Or it could be argued that signing Delhomme means the Clausen pick was a waste.

I don't think Clausen will be good in the NFL. There is no question that he was throwing the ball last year to three NFL 1/2 round pass catchers in Tate, Rudolph, and Floyd. People would argue that they might only be considered as such because of Clausen, but the truth is those guys, especially Floyd and Tate, made some spectacular plays on balls that were up for grabs. Those two will be NFL studs, no doubt.

No, we need secondary help badly. Especially at safety. If Berry is there, it's a no-brainer. If he's not, then I have no problem taking Thomas there, although I think we could trade back into the 11-20 range and still get him and add a few picks/players along the way.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167107https://brownsboard.com/post/167107Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:28:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:08:02 GMT]]>

@ballpeen said:

For any who have gone to Vegas, you know the only real way to make money is to risk money.

"Scared money never wins" -- Jimmy The Greek.

Maybe Mary Kay needs a new Golden Domer boyfriend.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167105https://brownsboard.com/post/167105Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:08:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:49:43 GMT]]>Well, if we draft Clausen I don't think we'll have to worry about the "rape factor" with him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167070https://brownsboard.com/post/167070Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:49:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:41:14 GMT]]>this article is Retarded...

"8. Raiders: OT Bruce Campbell, Maryland. (Jerry McDonald, Oakland Tribune) "There's a 50-50 shot they take Campbell, but they'd probably take Trent Williams over him"

Tell me that makes a lot of sense?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167069https://brownsboard.com/post/167069Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:41:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:39:42 GMT]]>I say we all come to the agreement now.. If we take Jimm Clausen that we all make a pack to start our own Cult and do a mass suicide..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167068https://brownsboard.com/post/167068Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:39:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:25:59 GMT]]>i'm beginning to think

Bradford(stl)

Suh(det)

McCoy(tb)

Okung(wash)

T.Williams(KC)

Claussen(sea)

Berry(cle)

Mays(thanks Al) 😛(oak)

Bulaga(buff)

JPP(jax)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167066https://brownsboard.com/post/167066Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:25:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Mock on Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:03:52 GMT]]>I am beginning to think we will as well.

When you think about it, this is the year to do it.

First year QBs don't do much. Seeing as we have a bunch of extra picks to us to help build the team in the more here and now, Clausen makes some sense.

Sooner or later you have to take a QB fairly early. It's my opinion you can't keep trying to live with 3rd and 4th round QB selections.

For any who have gone to Vegas, you know the only real way to make money is to risk money.

Sure, every once in a while a nickel slot pays a jackpot worth some serious cash, but you have to sit at the $5 and $10 machines to have a realistic shot at making some real money without getting totally lucky and hitting the jackpot.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/167062https://brownsboard.com/post/167062Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:03:52 GMT