<![CDATA[The cover-up continues.]]>The cover-up continues. This past Sunday, Congressman Joe Sestak appeared on Meet the Press and continued to tap dance around the charge he made that he was offered a government job to drop out of the campaign. Here’s the exchange between Sestak and NBC’s David Gregory:

MR. GREGORY: Yes or no, straightforward question. Were you, were you offered a job, and what was the job?

REP. SESTAK: I was offered a job, and I answered that.

MR. GREGORY: You said no, you wouldn’t take the job. Was it the secretary of the Navy?

REP. SESTAK: Right. And I also said, “Look, I’m getting into this…

MR. GREGORY: Was it the secretary of the Navy job?

REP. SESTAK: Anything that go — goes beyond that is others — for others to talk about.

Well it’s not exactly “for others to talk about” Congressman Sestak.

If Sestak was really offered a job to drop out of the race, a crime occurred. If he is not being forthcoming about who offered him the job, what job he was offered, and the conditions surrounding the offer, Joe Sestak is covering up a crime.

Sestak’s Democratic opponent in the recent primary, Sen. Arlen Specter, along with Rep. Darrell Issa (R, Calif.), who is the top Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, have each suggested that should Sestak be telling the truth, such a job offer could constitute bribery, a federal crime.

Presidential mouthpiece Robert Gibbs was interviewed on Face the Nation this past weekend. He claimed that there was “nothing inappropriate” about the conversations the Pennsylvania lawmaker had with any administration staffers about a possible position within the administration

Source

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/12176/the-cover-up-continues.RSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 01:52:37 GMTWed, 26 May 2010 22:24:27 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Sat, 29 May 2010 12:30:37 GMT]]>

@heckofajobbrownie said:

Steve, I don't get it. You don't like that the people police arrest are reminded of the rights they have under the Constitution? Or do you not like the Constitution affords them those rights at all?

This should have it's own thread.

But you're close on both even though you put in the Heck absolute to argue against in the future.

No I don't think the constitution is the arbiter of right and wrong.

No I don't think one should have a right to not incriminate himself.

If you did not commit the crime you cannot incriminate yourself.

Unfortunately the legal system is a game and not a path toward justice.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175778https://brownsboard.com/post/175778Sat, 29 May 2010 12:30:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Sat, 29 May 2010 12:16:55 GMT]]>

@heckofajobbrownie said:

Carville doesn't hire prostitutes so he can suck on their toes. Let that image bounce around in your head next time you see Dick lying on television for money.

Though the image of Carville and Matalin doing it doesn't sit much better.

Actually I like Carville.

I don't often agree with him but he's crude and blunt and that's kinda refreshing.

Plus it's a riot when the Dems, who ge furious anytime anybody dare make a statement about some accepted sexual deviance, have a hissy fit when it's a blasphemer like Morris.

Close but no cigar?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175777https://brownsboard.com/post/175777Sat, 29 May 2010 12:16:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 16:33:28 GMT]]>Carville doesn't hire prostitutes so he can suck on their toes. Let that image bounce around in your head next time you see Dick lying on television for money.

Though the image of Carville and Matalin doing it doesn't sit much better.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175688https://brownsboard.com/post/175688Fri, 28 May 2010 16:33:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 16:24:42 GMT]]>

@heckofajobbrownie said:

And John, I would agree. In an industry with a fair amount of scummy people, I can't think of a single bigger scumbag than Dick Morris, either personally or professionally.

I take your word for it.

He 'scares' me just LOOKING at him.

Just for the record, I feel the same way about James Carville.

Full-time Halloween characters always in costume - masks even a mother couldn't love.

Not too many other people do that to me.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175684https://brownsboard.com/post/175684Fri, 28 May 2010 16:24:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 16:19:32 GMT]]>And John, I would agree. In an industry with a fair amount of scummy people, I can't think of a single bigger scumbag than Dick Morris, either personally or professionally.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175683https://brownsboard.com/post/175683Fri, 28 May 2010 16:19:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 16:13:04 GMT]]>Well, get used to it. They won't drop this one anytime soon, no matter how ridiculous. And if they take back the House, this is all we'll be doing.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175682https://brownsboard.com/post/175682Fri, 28 May 2010 16:13:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 16:06:02 GMT]]>I happened to watch a (very little) bit of Hannity last night - he isn't a favorite of mine - and he and the (very frightening) Dick Morris were talking about "High Crimes and Misdemenors" and a scandal of epic proportions.

If one were to look up a picture of "Politics" it would be a montage about this kind of stuff.

No big deal, IMHO.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175680https://brownsboard.com/post/175680Fri, 28 May 2010 16:06:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 15:31:46 GMT]]>Steve, I don't get it. You don't like that the people police arrest are reminded of the rights they have under the Constitution? Or do you not like the Constitution affords them those rights at all?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175673https://brownsboard.com/post/175673Fri, 28 May 2010 15:31:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 12:39:09 GMT]]>

@diehardbrownsfan said:

If this was GWB the liberals would be crying for his head. But since it's good old Obammy, no big deal. Just like with the oil disaster in the Gulf. Finally, after 1 month there is criticism coming from the left and right. And Obama goes to San Francisco for a fund raiser. Can you picture if this was Bush? Shows that the left doesn't care whats right, just as long as a Democrat/Liberal is in power. 🙄

We are seeing one cover up after the other for all of Obammys crap. We should of never allowed Steve Urkel to be president.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175641https://brownsboard.com/post/175641Fri, 28 May 2010 12:39:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 07:53:57 GMT]]>

@paxton said:

Shame.

Time to shitcan Miranda anyway.

But this is a pretty good example of "boys will be boys" V the end of democracy as we know it depending on who holds powere huh?

😉

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175625https://brownsboard.com/post/175625Fri, 28 May 2010 07:53:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Fri, 28 May 2010 00:43:07 GMT]]>Smart man.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175609https://brownsboard.com/post/175609Fri, 28 May 2010 00:43:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 23:52:02 GMT]]>More like a nasty breakup. And I'm going to go ahead and extricate myself from this while I still have some dignity.

See you guys on the football board.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175606https://brownsboard.com/post/175606Thu, 27 May 2010 23:52:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 21:14:39 GMT]]>I'm smelling a troll. Smells kind of like a "mosquitozit".

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175589https://brownsboard.com/post/175589Thu, 27 May 2010 21:14:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 20:41:55 GMT]]>Those are two separate discussions, ditz.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175587https://brownsboard.com/post/175587Thu, 27 May 2010 20:41:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 20:25:19 GMT]]>Shame.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175585https://brownsboard.com/post/175585Thu, 27 May 2010 20:25:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 20:24:41 GMT]]>

@heckofajobbrownie said:

Issa is working very, very hard at throwing mud against the wall.

Well, at least this "mudslinger" is protecting us from the Obama Administration's massive encroachment on our civil liberties.

Shame on you, Heck. Shame. Shame. Shame.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175584https://brownsboard.com/post/175584Thu, 27 May 2010 20:24:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 13:52:09 GMT]]>Some people think that the white house along with the liberal press will try to turn this around and blame it on Sestak. Almost like Linda Tripp, shoot the messenger and ignore the warning.

Arrogance.

political-pictures-richard-nixon-todays-standards.jpg

bigger%20than%20Nixon.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175526https://brownsboard.com/post/175526Thu, 27 May 2010 13:52:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 13:50:26 GMT]]>If this was GWB the liberals would be crying for his head. But since it's good old Obammy, no big deal. Just like with the oil disaster in the Gulf. Finally, after 1 month there is criticism coming from the left and right. And Obama goes to San Francisco for a fund raiser. Can you picture if this was Bush? Shows that the left doesn't care whats right, just as long as a Democrat/Liberal is in power. 🙄

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175524https://brownsboard.com/post/175524Thu, 27 May 2010 13:50:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 13:39:28 GMT]]>Dirty politics. If the charges are true, there is definitely some form of punishment due.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175520https://brownsboard.com/post/175520Thu, 27 May 2010 13:39:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 10:45:59 GMT]]>Unfortunately, we don't treat the rule of law seriously enough. The West Wing had an episode in which Josh Lyman committed essentially the same crime. No wonder the Obama administration so flippantly flaunts the spirit of the law, as well as basic political ethics.

If Republicans were in charge, liberals would be calling for the prosecution of White House aides. And they'd be right about it, just like conservatives are right here.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175494https://brownsboard.com/post/175494Thu, 27 May 2010 10:45:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 02:02:02 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Damn right. Next thing you know they'll be covering up third rate burglaries.

:0

WSS

LOL!

ObamaNixon.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175482https://brownsboard.com/post/175482Thu, 27 May 2010 02:02:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Thu, 27 May 2010 00:32:25 GMT]]>Well, I have heard an expert explain that if a bribe of a new job with the Obamao regime

was offered, that it will be a felony, and definately impeachable.

I'll go with the expert.

Obamao supporters are igoring the dirt in a tornado.

Not good, bark is falling off the ugly, corrupt Obamao regime tree.

BTW, now his approval rating is 42 percent.

A lot of people are very, very upset that they bought into

a butuski-ugly presidential performance so far, and looking uglier all the time.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175470https://brownsboard.com/post/175470Thu, 27 May 2010 00:32:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Wed, 26 May 2010 23:18:04 GMT]]>

@alo said:

I think impeachment hearings are in order here. If not for this, Obama should be sent to Guantanamo for nominating Hillary as SoS so she wouldn't run against him in 2012.

Our democracy is in peril.

Damn right. Next thing you know they'll be covering up third rate burglaries.

:0

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175445https://brownsboard.com/post/175445Wed, 26 May 2010 23:18:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The cover-up continues. on Wed, 26 May 2010 23:15:20 GMT]]>Issa is working very, very hard at throwing mud against the wall.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/175444https://brownsboard.com/post/175444Wed, 26 May 2010 23:15:20 GMT