<![CDATA[December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!?]]>December 24, 2005 Pittsburgh Steelers @ Cleveland Browns L 0-41

Who will step up for this Team and keep it respectable and try to Win?

or will we still see RAC standing there choking on his red challenge flag like he has done the past 2 weeks!

(that pass to BE from Cribbs was a catch and Tubby just stood there while the comentaters asked is someone sleeping on the Cleveland side lines? then they pan in on Fat ASSS!

The well has officially run dry

op57-8946.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/1449/december-28th-browns-at-pittspukeRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 04:37:13 GMTMon, 08 Dec 2008 02:49:50 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:36:42 GMT]]>an'at means this dick is a

FAG

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19764https://brownsboard.com/post/19764Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:36:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:34:39 GMT]]>

Steeler SChuck said:

3,124 posts of this like is an embarrassment (the correctly spelled version of this word) in it's own.

Regards

.... an'at

.

Says the guy who jacked up the grammar in the 'insult'.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19729https://brownsboard.com/post/19729Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:34:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:41:21 GMT]]>

Steeler SChuck said:

3,124 posts of this like is an embarrassment (the correctly spelled version of this word) in it's own.

Regards

.... an'at

.

fag

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19715https://brownsboard.com/post/19715Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:41:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:40:53 GMT]]>

@brownindian said:

Out of curiosity, When i read an'at it sounds like "a nut". Why are you referring to ur self as a nut unless ofcourse that is your name !

it's because he's a fag and his ass is very available.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19714https://brownsboard.com/post/19714Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:40:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:34:37 GMT]]>

Steeler SChuck said:

3,124 posts of this like is an embarrassment (the correctly spelled version of this word) in it's own.

Regards

.... an'at

.

Out of curiosity, When i read an'at it sounds like "a nut". Why are you referring to ur self as a nut unless ofcourse that is your name !

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19713https://brownsboard.com/post/19713Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:34:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:54:48 GMT]]>

Steeler SChuck said:

Exactly.

If the stains FO has any class, and I'm not sure they do, they'll fire RAC after the end of the season and bring in whoever for the upcoming draft so that whoever can have his coaching staff in order in a timely manner.

The fact that Marty's visit and the Cowher rumors are all over the papers tells me that the FO's not being to cautious about the matter.

Regards

..... an'at

.

fag

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19704https://brownsboard.com/post/19704Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:54:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:52:40 GMT]]>

Steeler SChuck said:

Dude.

Satellite dish.

dish.jpg

Regards

..... an'at

.

fag

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19702https://brownsboard.com/post/19702Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:52:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:52:06 GMT]]>

Steeler SChuck said:

It'll be a nice scrimmage to keep the first-teams warmed up for the upcoming bye week.

Regards

.... an'at

.

fag

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19701https://brownsboard.com/post/19701Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:52:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:20:52 GMT]]>i doubt it guys, as the squeelers will probably rest their starters and play a bunch of scrubbs!

27-17 browns will whoop their ass!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19689https://brownsboard.com/post/19689Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:20:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:21:00 GMT]]>

mz. said:

Yeah, I realize T barely knows how to spell his own name. But a word of advice, SChuck, if you're going to poke fun at someone's grammar, make sure you yourself know the difference between it's and its.

thanks for the correction, you are officialy hired as my proof reader.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19613https://brownsboard.com/post/19613Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:21:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:02:13 GMT]]>

Steeler SChuck said:

3,124 posts of this like is an embarrassment (the correctly spelled version of this word) in it's own.

Yeah, I realize T barely knows how to spell his own name. But a word of advice, SChuck, if you're going to poke fun at someone's grammar, make sure you yourself know the difference between it's and its.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19510https://brownsboard.com/post/19510Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:02:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:37:20 GMT]]>

Scott Player said:

At this point Romeo is the Biggest Cancer to the Browns, talking about a Lame Duck. He need s to go and he needs to go NOW!

Pass the muffins ma!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19508https://brownsboard.com/post/19508Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:37:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:33:53 GMT]]>

@mr.-t said:

Romeo's inability is an embarrasment in its own.

3,124 posts of this like is an embarrassment (the correctly spelled version of this word) in it's own.

Regards

.... an'at

.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19506https://brownsboard.com/post/19506Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:33:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:30:57 GMT]]>Romeo's inability is an embarrasment in its own.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19505https://brownsboard.com/post/19505Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:30:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:28:32 GMT]]>I hate agreeing with SChuck. He's a dick and loves to pile on, to be sure, but he's 100% correct.

Sometimes the Browns organization just flat-out embarrasses me.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19503https://brownsboard.com/post/19503Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:28:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:26:41 GMT]]>When lerner is ready to move he wont hesitate, i would bet he is listening to what some of the retired veterans have to say first though guys like Jim Brown & Bernie Kosar.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19502https://brownsboard.com/post/19502Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:26:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:41:37 GMT]]>

mz. said:

Not quite sure that's how it works...

Exactly.

If the stains FO has any class, and I'm not sure they do, they'll fire RAC after the end of the season and bring in whoever for the upcoming draft so that whoever can have his coaching staff in order in a timely manner.

The fact that Marty's visit and the Cowher rumors are all over the papers tells me that the FO's not being to cautious about the matter.

Regards

..... an'at

.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19482https://brownsboard.com/post/19482Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:41:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:39:09 GMT]]>

@mr.-t said:

Fire RAC and sign Marty immediatley to finish the season that way he will have a good feel of what we need come draft day!

Not quite sure that's how it works...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19480https://brownsboard.com/post/19480Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:39:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:29:58 GMT]]>Fire RAC and sign Marty immediatley to finish the season that way he will have a good feel of what we need come draft day!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19477https://brownsboard.com/post/19477Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:29:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:51:35 GMT]]>At this point Romeo is the Biggest Cancer to the Browns, talking about a Lame Duck. He need s to go and he needs to go NOW!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19426https://brownsboard.com/post/19426Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:51:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:45:51 GMT]]>And I am letting Flugel out of our yearly bet on both games. It's just not a fair bet with that coaches decisions.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19267https://brownsboard.com/post/19267Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:45:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:44:59 GMT]]>This game will be a slobberknocker as usual when our teams play. I don't give the browns a chance in hell of winning the game though. With your QB situation, and the coach, it is going to be ugly. I just hope we both come out of it relatively injury free. I'd really like to see the browns have a good coach, a good team, and be serious competition next season.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19264https://brownsboard.com/post/19264Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:44:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:40:58 GMT]]>And they say technology is a wonderful thing. 😵

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19159https://brownsboard.com/post/19159Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:40:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to December 28th? Browns at Pittspuke!? on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:37:31 GMT]]>See you next year Steelerman.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/19158https://brownsboard.com/post/19158Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:37:31 GMT