<![CDATA[James Davis]]>James Davis hits the holes with great timing, meaning he hits them fast while they are there. He is shifty, although it appeared that when he got into daylight that he didn't have the after-burner to take it to the house. He could be a great change of pace between the tackles though.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/15579/james-davisRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 02:10:34 GMTFri, 03 Sep 2010 02:57:49 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:46:09 GMT]]>Heckert seemed to be very high on Davis in his conference call.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/191154https://brownsboard.com/post/191154Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:46:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:30:07 GMT]]>I've been saying it since the beginning. James Davis could be the answer.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190953https://brownsboard.com/post/190953Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:30:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:09:48 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

With Hardesty showing warning signs of having KiJana Carter syndrome, the Browns would be nuts not to keep Davis as an insurance policy. It's rare that a team keeps 2 fullbacks, but in this case I think it's warranted with Vickers and Hillis.

Assuming Hardesty isn't crippled, it would about for sure mean the Browns will only carry 3 qbs.

agreed.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190899https://brownsboard.com/post/190899Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:09:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:14:09 GMT]]>

@samoth said:

Davis is awesome and would have been our starter last year if he didn't get hurt IMO. There's a reason he kept CJ Spiller on the bench at Clemson.

Samoth, I don't think Davis kept Spiller off the field. I think it was the other way round. There was a long pre-draft discussion on the radio about how Davis' carries decreased as Spiller emerged. That isn't to say that Davis isn't any good. I, too, was excited about Davis potentially being a breakout player last year. Hopefully that will happen this year!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190703https://brownsboard.com/post/190703Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:14:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:05:32 GMT]]>Davis. Jennings back to Canada.

He got his chance and made it happen.

With him and Hillis we have options - no more boo boo.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190701https://brownsboard.com/post/190701Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:05:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:26:15 GMT]]>Davis of course has had his own injury issues in the past. So lets see if he is even available first.]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190606https://brownsboard.com/post/190606Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:26:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:34:28 GMT]]>Davis is awesome and would have been our starter last year if he didn't get hurt IMO. There's a reason he kept CJ Spiller on the bench at Clemson.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190584https://brownsboard.com/post/190584Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:34:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:15:19 GMT]]>I have not watched the game yet but Im not a Jennings or Davis fan. It seems like Davis never breaks a tackle. In the Lions game it took no more than a finger to get him to the ground. I dont see him as a future #1 back for us. Monterio's injury really bothers me. I think we need to see whats available after final cuts. As it is I think we might see more of Hillis than people expect. I love our "bash brothers" backfield with Hillis and Vickers.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190576https://brownsboard.com/post/190576Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:15:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:04:19 GMT]]>Davis looked good . DAVIS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190567https://brownsboard.com/post/190567Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:04:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:40:15 GMT]]>he does a phenomenal job of maintaining his speed through his cuts, thats why he makes alot of defenders look silly

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190562https://brownsboard.com/post/190562Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:40:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:46:19 GMT]]>Davis

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190551https://brownsboard.com/post/190551Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:46:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:17 GMT]]>Davis for sure..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190547https://brownsboard.com/post/190547Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:10:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:53:29 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

James Davis hits the holes with great timing, meaning he hits them fast while they are there. He is shifty, although it appeared that when he got into daylight that he didn't have the after-burner to take it to the house. He could be a great change of pace between the tackles though.

Cast my vote for Davis over Jennings. He has some moves and can break it wide. To bad he went down with a injury early last year. Our stable of RB's looks great comparded to the last couple of years. Jake should be able to spread the field for the run game to be one of our strenghts. "Rock on Browns!"

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190546https://brownsboard.com/post/190546Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:53:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:36:55 GMT]]>

@sj_browns said:

i hope hardesty is ok, but if he can't play this season, i'm confident the running game will still thrive with jerome, hillis, cribbs and davis (if he makes the team).

With Hardesty showing warning signs of having KiJana Carter syndrome, the Browns would be nuts not to keep Davis as an insurance policy. It's rare that a team keeps 2 fullbacks, but in this case I think it's warranted with Vickers and Hillis.

Assuming Hardesty isn't crippled, it would about for sure mean the Browns will only carry 3 qbs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190543https://brownsboard.com/post/190543Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:36:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:27:56 GMT]]>i hope hardesty is ok, but if he can't play this season, i'm confident the running game will still thrive with jerome, hillis, cribbs and davis (if he makes the team).

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190532https://brownsboard.com/post/190532Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:27:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:50:45 GMT]]>Keep Davis.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190527https://brownsboard.com/post/190527Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:50:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:08:14 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

I would say Davis has tremendous vision and burst. He stays.

Hardesty may have come back too quickly, but he walked off the field okay...

The Browns finally have some nice depth a lot of positions, if not most.

Nice problem to have.

agreed. i think davis has more to offer the browns on offense than jennings does.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190525https://brownsboard.com/post/190525Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:08:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:38:26 GMT]]>I would say Davis has tremendous vision and burst. He stays.

Hardesty may have come back too quickly, but he walked off the field okay...

The Browns finally have some nice depth a lot of positions, if not most.

Nice problem to have.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190522https://brownsboard.com/post/190522Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:38:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to James Davis on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:02:48 GMT]]>Between him and Jennings I like Davis also.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/190515https://brownsboard.com/post/190515Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:02:48 GMT