Seneca Wallace

Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:38:55 GMT

Mr. T — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:38:55 GMT

mikeyP72 said:
What's the look on his face? Intrigue? Envy? Confusion?
I can't figure it out LOL

Hand on his hip shows one of 2 things, he is either tired/exhausted or just bored, and he looks like he is watching Seneca's footwork. I never realized the size difference before until they were standing together. But look at Flutie he was only 5'7".

Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:13:04 GMT

Mr. T — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:13:04 GMT

mikeyP72 said:
JD looks like he's checking out Seneca's thigh muscles...

LOL! That is why I picked that picture.

Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:12:08 GMT

Mr. T — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:12:08 GMT

@bringbackbrownie2 said:
I'd like to think that our defense held them to 9, since we gave them a pick 6.. and 3 of the 9 came off of Harrison's fumble. So our defense really played well..

That is correct, our defense only gave up 3 field goals, and we should of won if it has not been for the turnovers we would of. Turnovers are killing this team, lack of concentration or lack of coaching from the OC, or who else could we blame other than lazy players.

I see a few guys striving to get better and then I see guys like Watson who look like they are suprised to even be playing the game still, but love the check.

In what week will Wallace come out of the game hurt and go onto the IR where he can get paid and not have to do anymore work for it? Does Delhomme fit this same mold?

My point is we need to weed out the bad apples, and play those who are hungry and want to make a statement, that they are professional football players 100% all of the time.

Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:06:49 GMT

Gips — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:06:49 GMT

Wallace would have looked and played better had he rightfully replaced delhomme at halftime last week and got some time in, but thats another thread about a certain lack of faith in players and preparation that never develops in cleveland....

Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:54:49 GMT

USFBrown — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:54:49 GMT

I think the way the team is now, Seneca gives us the best chance to win. He's got a cannon for an arm and is mobile. JD is a statue who seems to panic.

Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:52:52 GMT

bringbackbrownie2 — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:52:52 GMT

@mr.-t said:
Wallace went 16 of 31 with 229 yards and a TD!
I'm glad to see we have some depth at the QB position.

Other than the pick 6 to Flowers and the Dawson missed FG we might of won. Our defense held the Chiefs to only 16 points.

Seneca did almost as well or better than Cassell as a backup player. I would like to see him get a few more starts to see what he can bring to the offense. Just maybe if we could get Slown ass Watson to get out on some blocks we could enjoy watching a running game again.

I'd like to think that our defense held them to 9, since we gave them a pick 6.. and 3 of the 9 came off of Harrison's fumble. So our defense really played well..

Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:51:42 GMT

ITHIKA — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:51:42 GMT

@mr.-t said:
Wallace went 16 of 31 with 229 yards and a TD!
I'm glad to see we have some depth at the QB position.

Other than the pick 6 to Flowers and the Dawson missed FG we might of won. Our defense held the Chiefs to only 16 points.

Seneca did almost as well or better than Cassell as a backup player. I would like to see him get a few more starts to see what he can bring to the offense. Just maybe if we could get Slown ass Watson to get out on some blocks we could enjoy watching a running game again.

d actually only gave up 9 points. the pic six was the other 7