@usfbrown said:

Gay

@calfoxwc said:

much better at finding open receivers, and getting them the ball quickly. He can also throw a freakin sideline pattern.

I don't hate Seneca, but I expected more out of him...

But, God forbid if Seneca or JD goes on IR, there is always the OLD guy... @@

If we signed him instead of putting in Colt I would cry myself to sleep even more-so. This is going to be a ROUGH year.

Lets just pray we can make it through without any major injuries.

Already missing D'Qwell Jackson on what is prolly the last year he will be in Cleveland.

much better at finding open receivers, and getting them the ball quickly. He can also throw a freakin sideline pattern.

I don't hate Seneca, but I expected more out of him...

But, God forbid if Seneca or JD goes on IR, there is always the OLD guy... @@

*************************************

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-morningrush092710

Congratulations to Daunte Culpepper(notes), whose second game for the UFL’s Sacramento Mountain Lions on Saturday was a beauty: He completed 26-of-42 passes for 374 yards and three touchdowns in a come-from-behind victory over the Florida Tuskers, throwing the winning, 33-yard TD pass to Rod Windsor with 31 seconds remaining. Back in June, Culpepper told me a major reason for his decision to play in the fledgling league was so he could share the experience of being a starting quarterback with his five children. “For sure it is [special],” Culpepper reiterated Sunday, noting that his kids were among the estimated 20,000 fans at Hughes Stadium. Personally, I’d like to see this immensely talented player get a call from one of the NFL teams in search of quality QB play. Yes, I’m talking to you Chan Gailey, and Eric Mangini, and Jack Del Rio, and Ken Whisenhunt, and …

Actually here is a quote from another thread that indicates seneca did make the call and not dabol

With 4:05 to play and facing a third-and-2, however, Wallace decided not to try and pound the ball for a first down, or even attempt a short pass. Instead, he missed a long pass attempt to Josh Cribbs.

“Seneca liked the matchup and took a chance,” Mangini said. “It was not a bad decision, but we needed a better throw.”

@1-more-season said:

Exactly what I was thinking. I don't care who we play as long as we win.

Put in Cribbs for all I care.

Homotron said:

They've both put up the same amount of wins this season. So what's the difference?

@medicineman said:

Yeah, let's continue the QB carousel and it'll be a great ol time just like last year!

@brownindian said:

Really!?! I guess we will never know. Im just sick of close calls I want wins. We lost 2 games in a row with Seneca. If Jack or Jake is ready to play then lets see what he can do.

Dawgfanforever88 said:

I didn't say he was the future of the team. I said he could be..he is 30..but he hasn't played a lot so he would be a young 30 as opposed to an old 35 like Jake. We know Jake isn't the future..he's got a year or two left maybe more if he sticks around as a back up like Brunnell. So why not let Wallace keep starting and see where it goes, its not like he's playing terrible.

@mark-o said:

Either way....we're winning on Sunday.

I'm sorry, but a 30 year old qb is not the future of any team anywhere especially one that doesn't have any accuracy throwing down the sidelines. All Wallace and Delhomme are is stop gaps till we get our Qb that we want to groom, be that Colt McCoy or somebody else.

Either way....we're winning on Sunday.

Dawgfanforever88 said:

And Walsh was taught by none other than Paul Brown.

@pikeym27 said:

I say Jake. At least he's been a starter QB. Senecca has been somewhat adequate but he is what he is a back-up if he was anything more someone would have noticed before now.

This season is going nowhere so let Jake play if he is healthy. If he continues what he did last year and in the first game this year sit him down and let Colt have some starts that way they'll know what they have with him.

@usfbrown said:

With this in mind, who starts next week? Do we keep the guy who looks decent and put up good numbers. Or do we go back to Delhomme and think he'll do better. Personally, I think we stick with Seneca. He had all week to work with the #1's and get into rhythm. He gives us another factor on offense that Delhomme just doesn't have, his athleticism. I believe we need to take any advantage we can get and Seneca provides more than JD.

It looks like we only fumbled once which is ok. We still had too many penalties. But it does appear we are improving.

***But I did hear we punted on 4th and 2 with something like 5 minutes to go in the game! WTF?!?!?!? I've been a supported of Mangini this year, but WTF was with that call? That is not going to win Magini or Daboll any support for doofus calls like that.

Overall I am pleased, even though we're 0-3. I finally see a little light on the horizon, intertwined with a couple thunderstorm clouds.

*** EDIT: I did not see the game and I thought we were on their side of the field. We should have punted... My bad.

Jake without a doubt if healthy.

@kosar_for_president said:

EXACTLY! Hillis rushes for over 100 yds against a top defense, and they throw a bomb on 3rd and 2???? Feed the rock to Hillis, get the first down... the drive continues. Sheesh! It isn't rocket science!

Seneca has manned up to the challenge, I want to see more of what he can do.