<![CDATA[Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings]]>Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/16047/official-week-three-nfl-power-rankingsRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 04:53:43 GMTFri, 01 Oct 2010 01:51:58 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sun, 03 Oct 2010 05:09:55 GMT]]>

@miktoxic said:

naasty and ugly from taking drugs...#1....Pittsburgh Steelers. congrats boys we thought you might have slipped from last years' number 1!

To be a steelers fan you have to be on drugs!

I found a new video of steelers fans here check it out! They are all just to sexy!

😆

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197524https://brownsboard.com/post/197524Sun, 03 Oct 2010 05:09:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sun, 03 Oct 2010 03:49:39 GMT]]> naasty and ugly from taking drugs...#1....Pittsburgh Steelers. congrats boys we thought you might have slipped from last years' number 1!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197520https://brownsboard.com/post/197520Sun, 03 Oct 2010 03:49:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:47:34 GMT]]>

@gafreleets said:

well yahoo's power rankings have the Steelers at #2

and the browns at #30

don't know if any power rankings are "official" but lets just say he's in the ballpark.

Well, ESPN had pretty much the same, FoxSports has the Steelers #1, the Browns #29.

Games aren't played by power rankings, you play them on the field. Our dear departed Buckky Buc fan would love to point out Tampa should have gotten killed last year when they played the Saints if you went by "Power Rankings"- they wound up winning that game.

Those rankings are what they are- a beauty contest.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197477https://brownsboard.com/post/197477Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:47:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:37:36 GMT]]>

@gafreleets said:

well yahoo's power rankings have the Steelers at #2

and the browns at #30

don't know if any power rankings are "official" but lets just say he's in the ballpark.

You mean it has a team at 3-0 near the top and a team at 0-3 near the bottom? Where do you guys find this groundbreaking stuff? Is there a newsletter that I can subscribe to for this in-depth analysis? For you all to come to a forum that has nothing to do with your team and post this sort of drivel really doesn't speak well of you. It is obvious that you pin your self worth to a bunch of grown men playing a sport. Sad, really.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197476https://brownsboard.com/post/197476Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:37:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:22:17 GMT]]>

@pizzadeliveryguy said:

Well, if Bo Jack Russo says it is so, the it must be so.

Some guys blog = official?

well yahoo's power rankings have the Steelers at #2

and the browns at #30

don't know if any power rankings are "official" but lets just say he's in the ballpark.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197473https://brownsboard.com/post/197473Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:22:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:31:26 GMT]]>Well, if Bo Jack Russo says it is so, the it must be so.

Some guys blog = official?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197465https://brownsboard.com/post/197465Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:31:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:30:05 GMT]]>Mo says: The Bengals are just as much of an enigma this year as last. The Browns are still the Browns.

Bungles 30-17

Bo Says: This is just the game that Carson Palmer need to get back in sync with his receivers yes? No. The Kittens are a terrible yet lucky team. Seneca Wallace and company of nobodies will expose this terrible team for what they are. Cincinnati sucks.

Cleveland 15-14

I can see either of these scenario's happening this week...

It really depends on so many factors from both clubs its not even predictable, and thats before you add in the potential for the mangini bad decisions factor...

Optimism says:

Browns 23

Bungals 17

Common sense says:

Bungals 37

Browns 17

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197459https://brownsboard.com/post/197459Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:30:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:29:10 GMT]]>

@steeler-schick said:

Like this?

AFC NORTH W L T PCT

Pittsburgh 3 0 0 1.000

Cincinnati 2 1 0 .667

Baltimore 2 1 0 .667

Cleveland 0 3 0 .000

Lotta zeros in those standings.

Regards...

... an'at

.

is that you in your avatar??? looks more like a cow than a chick.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197448https://brownsboard.com/post/197448Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:29:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:30:52 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

There is nothing "Official" about this. Just a couple of dude's opinions.

The "Official" power rankings are the standings

.

Like this?

AFC NORTH W L T PCT

Pittsburgh 3 0 0 1.000

Cincinnati 2 1 0 .667

Baltimore 2 1 0 .667

Cleveland 0 3 0 .000

Lotta zeros in those standings.

Regards...

... an'at

.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197446https://brownsboard.com/post/197446Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:30:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings on Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:46:49 GMT]]>

@endurance said:

Official Week Three NFL Power Rankings

There is nothing "Official" about this. Just a couple of dude's opinions.

The "Official" power rankings are the standings.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197382https://brownsboard.com/post/197382Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:46:49 GMT