<![CDATA[Seneca Wallace]]>So you guys think that now he has what it takes to be our Legit QB ? At this point i seem to prefer him to JD. JD seems to have the higher ceiling and did well in the preseason, but the way Wallace is improving I think we have a legit QB controversy. Any one agree ?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/16093/seneca-wallaceRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 04:55:04 GMTMon, 04 Oct 2010 15:21:21 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:56:42 GMT]]>Ive thought seneca could be the starter all along, however i do believe mangini and dabs gameplan was made around jake starting and if jake had not of been hurt we would likely be 3-1 or maybe even 4-0, but as the rust comes off of seneca he is proving he can start in the nfl quite effectively and for any number of teams that may inquire about him later on...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197792https://brownsboard.com/post/197792Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:56:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:40:32 GMT]]>Its really a tough call, but with our lack of receiving talent I would rather have mobility, Wallace has saved us from quite a few sacks already this year, and it seems like he isn't as likely to throw a pick.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197791https://brownsboard.com/post/197791Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:40:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Seneca Wallace on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:35:17 GMT]]>

@brownindian said:

So you guys think that now he has what it takes to be our Legit QB ? At this point i seem to prefer him to JD. JD seems to have the higher ceiling and did well in the preseason, but the way Wallace is improving I think we have a legit QB controversy. Any one agree ?

Wallace has mobility on his side, but has problems throwing down field and especially throwing to the sidelines. But our receivers are terrible and can't get open so I really don't think it matters who we have at QB.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197789https://brownsboard.com/post/197789Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:35:17 GMT