<![CDATA[Out of the tendered players, who do you think deserves a long term deal?]]>i've been impressed with vickers and roth a lot this year. i felt that vick should've been given a long-term deal last year, but i guess that the new regime wanted him to prove his worth. roth has been crucial and i would say that other than benard, he is our most legitimate pass rusher out of the LB corps.

i think that this may be the end of d'qwell jackson's time in cleveland as well as harrison.

i know that it's only week 4, but i feel like we are getting a pretty clear picture of who needs to be kept around at the conclusion of the season.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/16097/out-of-the-tendered-players-who-do-you-think-deserves-a-long-term-dealRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 19:08:46 GMTMon, 04 Oct 2010 19:32:35 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Out of the tendered players, who do you think deserves a long term deal? on Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:01:02 GMT]]>brian daboll. 'nuff said.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/198005https://brownsboard.com/post/198005Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:01:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Out of the tendered players, who do you think deserves a long term deal? on Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:00:07 GMT]]>

@mudratdetector said:

i've been impressed with vickers and roth a lot this year. i felt that vick should've been given a long-term deal last year, but i guess that the new regime wanted him to prove his worth. roth has been crucial and i would say that other than benard, he is our most legitimate pass rusher out of the LB corps.

i think that this may be the end of d'qwell jackson's time in cleveland as well as harrison.

i know that it's only week 4, but i feel like we are getting a pretty clear picture of who needs to be kept around at the conclusion of the season.

Let's give the second half of the season some life, by inking Roth and Vickers to a multi-year deal.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197992https://brownsboard.com/post/197992Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:00:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Out of the tendered players, who do you think deserves a long term deal? on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:41:53 GMT]]> I think we tendered him to much.....he's very tender

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197974https://brownsboard.com/post/197974Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:41:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Out of the tendered players, who do you think deserves a long term deal? on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:59:52 GMT]]>

@mudratdetector said:

i've been impressed with vickers and roth a lot this year. i felt that vick should've been given a long-term deal last year, but i guess that the new regime wanted him to prove his worth. roth has been crucial and i would say that other than benard, he is our most legitimate pass rusher out of the LB corps.

i think that this may be the end of d'qwell jackson's time in cleveland as well as harrison.

i know that it's only week 4, but i feel like we are getting a pretty clear picture of who needs to be kept around at the conclusion of the season.

I agree with you that Vickers & Roth are keepers. These 2, IMHO, are MUST KEEP players that we need to sign to long term deals..Both are just 27 years old & excellent players. Harrison & Jackson will be (and should be) gone.

Mike

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/197965https://brownsboard.com/post/197965Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:59:52 GMT