<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Hereafter Review]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><b>Hereafter</b></p>
<p>
Warner Brothers</p>
<p>
PG 13              126 min</p>

<p>
So this one comes with some high expectations. Oh I don’t mean Matt Damon who has yet to really impress me with a role, but the guys at the helm.</p>
<p>
As a director, Clint Eastwood rarely fails to deliver and Producer Steven Spielberg is no rookie.</p>
<p>
Even the premise held interest featuring three people whose lives entwine around the idea of an actual afterlife. </p>
<p>
Who among us hasn’t spent some hours puzzling over what might be on the other side of the mortal plane?</p>
<p>
I usually find that three-way storyline interesting as well. We have George (Damon) an embittered and lonely psychic who has given up the craft. He feels the gift is a curse and wants no part of knowing or revealing anyone’s spiritual secrets.</p>
<p>
There is Marie (Cecile de France) a French Journalist who has had a near (or beyond) death experience.</p>
<p>
After her glimpse of the other side she becomes less intense about her career as an investigator. She wants to share her knowledge of, well, the hereafter.</p>
<p>
There’s a little boy in England (Frankie McLaren in a dual role) whose twin brother, closer than even most twins, is struck down by a random accident. He’s committed to finding his brother on the other side, being disappointed over and over by the many charlatans who promise spirit contact.</p>
<p>
Actually the biggest problem here is that none of these stories move along at any great speed nor are any all that interesting.</p>
<p>
The ending should be fairly clear once you realize that these three are on a course to cross paths. It’s a pleasant enough way to end the rather long and slow film but there isn’t any earth-shaking climax. I think you’ll be expecting more and more never comes to pass.</p>

<p>
C+</p>
<p>
WSS</p>

<p>
Email westsidesteve@aol.com</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/16942/hereafter-review</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 02:31:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/16942.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:44:23 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hereafter Review on Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:52:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/king-ghoolie-lives" aria-label="Profile: king-ghoolie-lives">@<bdi>king-ghoolie-lives</bdi></a> said:</p>I found this teh same way you did. Cathy got pissed because I started shutitng my eyes. They goofed with not moving it along more in the middle. Maybe they needed a more complex story line? Maybe two parallel but independant climaxes and stories?
<p>
The bit with the twin boy got to me. That was really an emotional part.</p>

<p>
I agree with your comments, but I give it a B based on the end coming together for me. OF course I am a bit more sappy than you. Remember I was raised among democrats.</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
<b>Sappier than me????</b></p>
<p>
Nah.</p>
<p>
I cry at half these damn things.</p>
<p>
&lt;G&gt;</p>
<p>
WSS</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/211131</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/211131</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:52:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>