<![CDATA[We are lucky to have Delhomme!]]>Stats never lie. Jake Delhomme outplayed Peyton Manning today. No more disrespecting the Hommeeeeee. His QB rating was 64.6 with a mere 2 INT's while Manning's rating was 59.8 with 4 INT's. 😆

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/17153/we-are-lucky-to-have-delhommeRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 09:49:46 GMTMon, 29 Nov 2010 04:26:28 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to We are lucky to have Delhomme! on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:50:17 GMT]]>This is Retarded... Delhome Sucks!!!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/211509https://brownsboard.com/post/211509Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:50:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We are lucky to have Delhomme! on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:31:53 GMT]]>Yeah I guess. But on any other day, I would choose Peyton.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/211501https://brownsboard.com/post/211501Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:31:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We are lucky to have Delhomme! on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:48:11 GMT]]>

@longhorn said:

Stats never lie. Jake Delhomme outplayed Peyton Manning today. No more disrespecting the Hommeeeeee. His QB rating was 64.6 with a mere 2 INT's while Manning's rating was 59.8 with 4 INT's. 😆

With the way Jake played today I would take Archie (at 50 plus years old) or Cooper (the oldest

brother) today.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/211474https://brownsboard.com/post/211474Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:48:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to We are lucky to have Delhomme! on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:36:00 GMT]]>

@longhorn said:

Stats never lie. Jake Delhomme outplayed Peyton Manning today. No more disrespecting the Hommeeeeee. His QB rating was 64.6 with a mere 2 INT's while Manning's rating was 59.8 with 4 INT's. 😆

hahah I was thinking the same thing

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/211471https://brownsboard.com/post/211471Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:36:00 GMT