<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Rating the Franchises - Best and Worst]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Best</p>

<p>
Steelers - Patriots (tie 1 &amp; 2)</p>
<p>
Colts</p>



<p>
Worst (Worst first)</p>

<p>
Lions</p>
<p>
Browns</p>
<p>
Texans</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/1723/rating-the-franchises-best-and-worst</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 03:54:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/1723.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:24:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Rating the Franchises - Best and Worst on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:09:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Good point about Arizona..........they rate last.........</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/22819</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/22819</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[rich4eagle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:09:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Rating the Franchises - Best and Worst on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:28:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ghoolie" aria-label="Profile: ghoolie">@<bdi>ghoolie</bdi></a> <a href="/post/22655">said</a>:</p>Best
<p>
Steelers - Patriots (tie 1 &amp; 2)</p>
<p>
Colts</p>



<p>
Worst (Worst first)</p>

<p>
Lions</p>
<p>
Browns</p>
<p>
Texans</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
 Don't forget Arizona.... they should be right down at the bottom too.  First division title ever this year?!  HA.   In that $hit division.. Laughable man</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/22755</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/22755</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[585Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:28:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Rating the Franchises - Best and Worst on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:50:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ghoolie" aria-label="Profile: ghoolie">@<bdi>ghoolie</bdi></a> <a href="/post/22656">said</a>:</p>The Bengals have been to 2 superbowls, they are far from the worst.</blockquote>

<p>
Bengals far from worst? They deserve to be rated right down there with the Lions. "Commitment to mediocrity" should be their motto. The Bengals two Super Bowl appearances are proof blind squirrels do occasionally find nuts. They're also proof it's better to be lucky than good. </p>

<p>
Mike Brown doesn't have a F**king clue my friend. At least Lerner <b>tries</b> to hire competent people, Mickey B has his whole inbred family running the front office, and it's never going to change. Lerner spends money, Brown doesn't.</p>

<p>
That list is nothing more than a beauty contest. It would have been a tad different last year when the Browns went 10-6, and the Falcons sucked swamp water. The Colts would have rated as one of the worst ever in 1998, the year they drafted Peyton Manning.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/22741</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/22741</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:50:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Rating the Franchises - Best and Worst on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:25:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Bengals have been to 2 superbowls, they are far from the worst.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/22656</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/22656</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghoolie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:25:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>