<![CDATA[I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo]]>THere is an awful lot of talk here, among Browns fans in general, and in the media of the Browns lookiing to "win-out", the only way to win-out is to win each weeks game in front of you and it starts with a big task Sunday in Buffalo. That team up there is scary and not far behind us. I hope it continues to blizzard and becomes a running game. With Hillis and our Defense, I think we have the advantage, but I hope the change from Miami to Buffalo on the road don't hurt us.

We need to start concentrating on Buffalo. THe Baltimore and Pittsburgh games are miles away.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/17292/i-hope-that-we-are-not-over-looking-buffaloRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 10:06:46 GMTTue, 07 Dec 2010 12:29:47 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:44:14 GMT]]>This game might seem boring to some folks due to the weather, but I love it...this is REAL football! Snow, mud, slippin' & slidin', OH YEAH!

Any way you cut the cake, this will be a tough & dangerous game. Playing IN Buffalo & in THEIR type weather, but I we can take 'em as long as we're not looking ahead.

Mike

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214392https://brownsboard.com/post/214392Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:44:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:00:45 GMT]]>I see in the paper today that Vegas is calling the game a PICK. I guess that seems about right. Hard to favor either team, really, even if THE BROWNS ARE GOING TO KICK ASS TODAY!

Btw, where are the trash-talking Bills fans?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214385https://brownsboard.com/post/214385Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:00:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:44:59 GMT]]>The spread is down to 1 point. If I were a betting man, I'd be on this. But I know better than to think that I know better than the Vegas odds-makers.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214270https://brownsboard.com/post/214270Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:44:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:14:22 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

Right. The 8-0 game was in Cleveland. The 6-3 game was in Buffalo. The 6-3 game was played in October so it wasn't the "whiteout" game like the 8-0 game was.

The 6-3 game in Buffalo wasn't that the Game Anderson was AWSOME? lol

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214210https://brownsboard.com/post/214210Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:14:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:08:29 GMT]]>

@medicineman said:

That game was in Cleveland

Right. The 8-0 game was in Cleveland. The 6-3 game was in Buffalo. The 6-3 game was played in October so it wasn't the "whiteout" game like the 8-0 game was.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214126https://brownsboard.com/post/214126Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:08:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:39:40 GMT]]>

@wrrebel said:

eric-mangini-cleveland-browns.jpg

haha, why does Mangini look like a complete fruitcake in every picture?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214070https://brownsboard.com/post/214070Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:39:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:21:14 GMT]]>

@brnfan16 said:

It was 8-0 one of the rarest scores in Browns history. I think of it as the "white-out" game and Phil Dawson kicking a 49 yard FG in the blowning wind and snow. This looks like the perfect Hillis game, just grind it out. It will be a close game into the 4th quarter. I don't think overlook applies here the Browns know where they came from in the beginning of the season. You can't look past anyone in the NFL.

That game was in Cleveland

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214069https://brownsboard.com/post/214069Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:21:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:55:43 GMT]]>

@professor_g said:

What am I missing about how we match up with Buffalo? Vegas has us down by 1.5 and the consensus at ProFootballWeekly is that Buffalo will win. I say we will run the ball effectively against the worst run defense in the league, eat up the clock winning time of possession, and our backfield will get another interception or two winning the turnover battle.

What's the argument on the other side?

A. The Bills are at home. That gives them an instant 3 point Vegas edge. Plus, they play tough at home. Witness that they should have beaten the Steelers

B. The Bills play tough no matter who they play. Of their 10 losses, 6 have been by a TD or less.

C. Their offense can put up some point. People like what Ryan Fitzpatrick has been doing.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214045https://brownsboard.com/post/214045Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:55:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:44:37 GMT]]>The browns will win this game, so put your money on it..

Btw, watch for the fake fg this week

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/214029https://brownsboard.com/post/214029Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:44:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:04:15 GMT]]>

@flugel said:

I hear ya. Traditionally, these alleged supposed to win games have stiung us bad. It's like getting Heidi's Kluhms between the sheets and finding out you got slinky stinger and no viagra to remedy it. Well, not quite that bad - but it's freakin disppointing.

The Buffalo Bills were a dropped pass in the end zone from beating Pittsburgh. PLUS, Jake Delhomme still scares me especially when rattled.

- Tom F.

We are a few stupid turnovers from being 8-4 or 9-3.

Should have beat the Bucs, Chiefs, Jets and Jags.

Granted, shoulda, coulda, woulda means nothing... This team is coming together right now. I think Delhomme will get benched again by the end of the season and ride the bench next year in favor of McCoy as the starter.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213948https://brownsboard.com/post/213948Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:04:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:49:00 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

THere is an awful lot of talk here, among Browns fans in general, and in the media of the Browns lookiing to "win-out", the only way to win-out is to win each weeks game in front of you and it starts with a big task Sunday in Buffalo. That team up there is scary and not far behind us. I hope it continues to blizzard and becomes a running game. With Hillis and our Defense, I think we have the advantage, but I hope the change from Miami to Buffalo on the road don't hurt us.

We need to start concentrating on Buffalo. THe Baltimore and Pittsburgh games are miles away.

I hear ya. Traditionally, these alleged supposed to win games have stiung us bad. It's like getting Heidi's Kluhms between the sheets and finding out you got slinky stinger and no viagra to remedy it. Well, not quite that bad - but it's freakin disppointing.

The Buffalo Bills were a dropped pass in the end zone from beating Pittsburgh. PLUS, Jake Delhomme still scares me especially when rattled.

- Tom F.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213933https://brownsboard.com/post/213933Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:49:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:15:54 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

They probably will if they repeat their defensive performance. Remember the last time the Browns played in Buffalo the score was 9-0.

It was 8-0 one of the rarest scores in Browns history. I think of it as the "white-out" game and Phil Dawson kicking a 49 yard FG in the blowning wind and snow. This looks like the perfect Hillis game, just grind it out. It will be a close game into the 4th quarter. I don't think overlook applies here the Browns know where they came from in the beginning of the season. You can't look past anyone in the NFL.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213929https://brownsboard.com/post/213929Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:15:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:29:10 GMT]]>Surprised Bills fan hasn't weighed in yet.troll-doll.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213897https://brownsboard.com/post/213897Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:29:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:10:27 GMT]]>Not only does Buffalo have a bad run defense but they lost two of their offensive linemen last week. Our defense needs to make a statement this week and get after the quarterback. We are the more talented team. If we limit our mistakes I know we can win.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213891https://brownsboard.com/post/213891Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:10:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:31:23 GMT]]>

@wrrebel said:

eric-mangini-cleveland-browns.jpg

he looks like the cat that just ate the canary

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213888https://brownsboard.com/post/213888Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:31:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:56:14 GMT]]>We need to find a way to get Jake out of the game. He is awful

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213872https://brownsboard.com/post/213872Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:56:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:54:51 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

Yeah, they played Baltimore and Pittsburgh a lot tougher than we did, and their offense seems to get better as the season goes along, first year in Chan Gailey's system and Fitzpatrick is no slouch. The Bills are 1.5 point favorites ... we're going to have to play a solid mistake-free game to win.

Zombo

But you get almost 3 points for playing at home. I like are chances.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213869https://brownsboard.com/post/213869Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:54:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:44:50 GMT]]>I expect Jake is finally getting comfortable with the offense and with his receivers. They'll ask him to manage the game and occasionally be effective with play action passing. His experience is a bonus compared to Fitzgerald, who is going to get picked!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213835https://brownsboard.com/post/213835Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:44:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:34:20 GMT]]>]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213834https://brownsboard.com/post/213834Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:34:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:27:03 GMT]]>

@professor_g said:

What am I missing about how we match up with Buffalo? Vegas has us down by 1.5 and the consensus at ProFootballWeekly is that Buffalo will win. I say we will run the ball effectively against the worst run defense in the league, eat up the clock winning time of possession, and our backfield will get another interception or two winning the turnover battle.

What's the argument on the other side?

easy Jake Delhomme..

need I say more?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213833https://brownsboard.com/post/213833Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:27:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:24:41 GMT]]>What am I missing about how we match up with Buffalo? Vegas has us down by 1.5 and the consensus at ProFootballWeekly is that Buffalo will win. I say we will run the ball effectively against the worst run defense in the league, eat up the clock winning time of possession, and our backfield will get another interception or two winning the turnover battle.

What's the argument on the other side?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213832https://brownsboard.com/post/213832Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:24:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:12:33 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

I agree, I thought we physically out-played Baltimore, we just didn't know how to win. I expect Baltimore to come here with an axe to grind.

since joe haden is now starting, i feel like we have the key ingredient in place to actually win this time. i don't see him giving up 3 TDs to Boldin.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213699https://brownsboard.com/post/213699Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:12:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:03:43 GMT]]>

@brownsbacker85 said:

I think we played Baltimore pretty damn tough.

I agree, I thought we physically out-played Baltimore, we just didn't know how to win. I expect Baltimore to come here with an axe to grind.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213698https://brownsboard.com/post/213698Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:03:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I hope that we are not over-looking Buffalo on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 05:32:15 GMT]]>Hillis can get well quick against the worst run defense in the NFL. The Browns are +7 in turnovers.....a sign of a disciplined team. The Browns had only 4 penalties against the fish.....another sign of a team

playing smart. Secondary is clamping down creating increase in QB pressure/sacks. Special teams have been steppin up and makin' plays. Keep the offensive game plan well within the limits of what Jake

can effectively manage and the Browns have anoother excellent opportunity for a victory as they step up their swagger. It's money time.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/213664https://brownsboard.com/post/213664Wed, 08 Dec 2010 05:32:15 GMT