You smart off to anyone and everyone who ever disagrees with you, like the

fat spoiled kid in "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory", only not as intelligent.

So, I lower my translations to fit your lack of legit contributions to this board.

NOTE: Heck, the cowardly lyin, is still too frightened to start his own thread.

But he's brave enough to argue with everybody elses' threads.

I think I hear Heck doing the "chicken dance".

@heckofajobbrownie said:

I had just written this:

"Ex: He lied about his wife recommending him. (So what? Doesn't mean you get to out the man's wife and end her career. You just say, "We didn't ask him to go." Or "We didn't send him. The CIA did.")

Next post: Why'd he lie about his wife recommending him?"

And then what did you do? You posted a link to an article entitled, "Plame's Input Is Cited on Niger Mission

Report Disputes Wilson's Claims on Trip, Wife's Role."

Come on, man.

Maybe you can say she recommended him for the role one more time, and then I can say that doesn't make it okay to blow her cover, and then this act will be so perfected we can take it on the road.

And even after this rant no answer.

Come on man.

BTW that article underscored more than that one discrepancy in their actions.

And you won't answer anything even though your enire case is innuendo.

You're just angry that your pipe dream of watching Cheney and Rove march up the thirteen steps to the gallows has gone up in smoke.

Cheer up; do some Christmas shopping.

WSS

"Steve just kicked my butt again, and I'm starting to pout."

I had just written this:

"Ex: He lied about his wife recommending him. (So what? Doesn't mean you get to out the man's wife and end her career. You just say, "We didn't ask him to go." Or "We didn't send him. The CIA did.")

Next post: Why'd he lie about his wife recommending him?"

And then what did you do? You posted a link to an article entitled, "Plame's Input Is Cited on Niger Mission

Report Disputes Wilson's Claims on Trip, Wife's Role."

Come on, man.

Maybe you can say she recommended him for the role one more time, and then I can say that doesn't make it okay to blow her cover, and then this act will be so perfected we can take it on the road.

Seriously, can't you stay on subject at all? Any LEGIT REASON, like ADD or something?

OTH, at least you didn't come up with Halliburton.

Talk about being a "goldfish"... you gotta be kidding, Heck, seriously.

Oops.....

I meant the WaPo....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...4-2004Jul9.html

@heckofajobbrownie said:

Oh I didn't really expect you to man up.

As usual rather than to admit the truth in any instance you complain about the questions again and again.

And STILL aviod answering.

So who's the goldfish?

And then you demand we stick to what we know.

We know all the things I listed.

And we know you couldn't get any meaningful conviction with all the power and money of the special "persecutor".

That musta been a pisser eh?

Hell Heck even in the bullshit Whitewater case there were multiple convictions.

Sorry bud this one's from the left end of the fever swamp.

WSS

You're like a goldfish, man. We can go over something a million times. Once you swim around the bowl once more it's new to you all over again.

Ex: Who is going to sacrifice for global warming? You? Al Gore? (Steve, it's not about personal sacrifice. And here's why...)

Next post: I just don't see anyone lining up to sacrifice personally.

Ex: Wilson said Cheney's office asked him to go. (No, Steve. He clearly states in his editorial that he'd been told the VP's office had questions about a possible sale and had asked the CIA about it and the CIA agreed to send Wilson.)

Next post: Why is Wilson saying Cheney's office sent him?

Ex: She wasn't covert. She wasn't covert. She was a desk jockey. (No, Steve. She was a covert CIA agent. She was working on weapons of mass destruction programs in Iraq and Iran.)

Next post: She was a desk jockey.

Ex: She wasn't outed because she wasn't covert. (No, Steve. We know that multiple members of the Bush administration fanned out and discussed her identity with reporters. This was a concerted push back for political reasons organized somewhere in the White House, pretty obviously in the VP's office.)

Next post: Maybe it was a mistake.

Ex: He lied about his wife recommending him. (So what? Doesn't mean you get to out the man's wife and end her career. You just say, "We didn't ask him to go." Or "We didn't send him. The CIA did.")

Next post: Why'd he lie about his wife recommending him?

You'll excuse me for not wanting to go around the bowl one more time with you.

Armitage was a former member of the Clinton admin. He had no loyalty to the Bush admin either.

It's a dangerous political game they were playing.

Yes, Plame and Wilson donated $$$$$$$ to Kerry.

Confusion reigns and wins. They confounded the investigation, just like the lawyers for O.J. Simpson did.

It was to discredit the Bush admin, for political purposes. The left is that corrupt,

and they play for keeps.