<![CDATA[ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC]]>Fcuk this team already, if this is true...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/1810/espn-reports-crennel-may-accept-demotion-to-dcRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 01:48:18 GMTSun, 28 Dec 2008 17:47:57 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:48:47 GMT]]>

@destinfunk said:

WHy do so many people have a problem with this? He was one of the best DCs in the league and won many Super Bowls in that role...He could get a gig with the Patriots tomm..

Dick LeBeau left the DC role to be a head coach and was AWFUL..his D was weak ...so he heads back the DC role..and poof all is good...i am not pushing for Crenell for DC...but when you weigh the options (no pun intended) who has a better resume as a DC?

Tucker can go back the DBs.. and they can bring in a motivator to get the whole team CHURNING together...

He said he would rather take the job at Arby's then working for the Browns shit stained organization in any capacity...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23925https://brownsboard.com/post/23925Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:48:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:47:46 GMT]]>WHy do so many people have a problem with this? He was one of the best DCs in the league and won many Super Bowls in that role...He could get a gig with the Patriots tomm..

Dick LeBeau left the DC role to be a head coach and was AWFUL..his D was weak ...so he heads back the DC role..and poof all is good...i am not pushing for Crenell for DC...but when you weigh the options (no pun intended) who has a better resume as a DC?

Tucker can go back the DBs.. and they can bring in a motivator to get the whole team CHURNING together...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23924https://brownsboard.com/post/23924Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:47:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:26:14 GMT]]>I'd love RAC as the DC. Guy knows his stuff but can't show it as a HC.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23878https://brownsboard.com/post/23878Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:26:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:10:18 GMT]]>

@hiwaygal said:

The only reason for continuity may be "warm-fuzzies" for current team members. And that's not necessarily a reason to keep him.

But (and I guess I'm sorta playing Devil's advocate here) - with a new HC in control, that could change some things. It could force RAC to do new stuff.

I'm wondering if this "news" is any indication of who is coming as HC/GM...who are people RAC would be willing to work for?

"warm-fuzzies" like "brown-shoes" dont make it!

Good riddence Fat Ass!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23860https://brownsboard.com/post/23860Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:10:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:06:42 GMT]]>agreed. please, no more rac in any capacity. his version of the 3-4 just doesn't work; it doesn't pressure the passer and doesn't stop the run. no, no, no.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23859https://brownsboard.com/post/23859Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:06:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:06:15 GMT]]>I agree, I want him gone too, just thinking of all sides, thinking out loud.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23819https://brownsboard.com/post/23819Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:06:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:04:10 GMT]]>

@plumcrazy73 said:

well our D in 2000 was pretty good if i remember right, so who knows, could be good to have the continuity of RAC as the D coordinator, course wonder how well he would take orders on a team he use to command.

Yeah, but this has been RAC's defense Plum.

Seriously, why would we want continuity of what exists now?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23818https://brownsboard.com/post/23818Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:04:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:01:52 GMT]]>well our D in 2000 was pretty good if i remember right, so who knows, could be good to have the continuity of RAC as the D coordinator, course wonder how well he would take orders on a team he use to command.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23816https://brownsboard.com/post/23816Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:01:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:00:21 GMT]]>I hear ya, hiwaygal, I just really that that's Crennel Rationalizing.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23815https://brownsboard.com/post/23815Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:00:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:57:17 GMT]]>I want RAC 'n ROLLS outta here for good. I could give a crap about the players liking him and the defense is what needs overhauled with an aggressive, attack style coach. Hell, this basically has been RAC's defense all along.

He's a nice man, but he really needs to go. Lerner will drop down some major pegs for me if he keeps Crennelephant around.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23813https://brownsboard.com/post/23813Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:57:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:55:12 GMT]]>One of the things KILLING this team is the no-pressure D. Keeping Crennel keeps this crap D scheme around.

Please, no.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23811https://brownsboard.com/post/23811Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:55:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to ESPN reports Crennel may accept demotion to DC on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:51:00 GMT]]>only way I'd accept this is if we bring Belicheck back as HC, and Pioli as GM,

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/23808https://brownsboard.com/post/23808Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:51:00 GMT