<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Redskins Still Looking To Trade Up For Gabbert]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If both Peterson and Green are gone when we are there i believe this is are best option,that would mean most likely Gabbert is still on the board for them..</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d81f7f7de/article/redskins-look-to-move-up-in-draft-take-missouri-qb-gabbert?module=HP_headlines" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d81f7f7de/article/redskins-look-to-move-up-in-draft-take-missouri-qb-gabbert?module=HP_headlines</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/19391/redskins-still-looking-to-trade-up-for-gabbert</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 21:33:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/19391.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:45:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Redskins Still Looking To Trade Up For Gabbert on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:08:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/234679">said</a>:</p>
<p><span style="color:#8B0000">Essentially, this article says that the Redskins don't even have the assets valuable enough in this draft to trade up to #6 with the Browns to grab Gabbert or Locker.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8B0000">What would you want in return for the Browns to move down to #10? They don't have a Round 2 pick.  How about next year's #1, plus like an additional 5th or 6th rounder in this draft.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8B0000">Would you make that deal?</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8B0000">To recap:  Browns trade #6 to Wash. Get back #10 this year and next year's #1 and a 5th or 6th rounder this year?   Deal?</span></p>

</blockquote>

<p>Make a 4th rounder plus #10 and 2012 1st rounder and we'd have a deal</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/234783</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/234783</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JMcCurry08]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:08:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Redskins Still Looking To Trade Up For Gabbert on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:56:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/234679">said</a>:</p>
<p><span style="color:#8B0000">Essentially, this article says that the Redskins don't even have the assets valuable enough in this draft to trade up to #6 with the Browns to grab Gabbert or Locker.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8B0000">What would you want in return for the Browns to move down to #10? They don't have a Round 2 pick.  How about next year's #1, plus like an additional 5th or 6th rounder in this draft.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8B0000">Would you make that deal?</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8B0000">To recap:  Browns trade #6 to Wash. Get back #10 this year and next year's #1 and a 5th or 6th rounder this year?   Deal?</span></p>

</blockquote>

<p>I would absolutely drop back 4 slots for a 1st rounder next year straight up... that is a bit unrealistic I think though</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/234780</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/234780</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cribbs is the man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:56:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Redskins Still Looking To Trade Up For Gabbert on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:55:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>mikeyP72 said:</p>
<p>Maybe players and picks next year?</p>

</blockquote>

<p>With the lockout, players cannot be traded this year on draft day..</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/234779</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/234779</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cribbs is the man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:55:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Redskins Still Looking To Trade Up For Gabbert on Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:00:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/nw220" aria-label="Profile: nw220">@<bdi>nw220</bdi></a> <a href="/post/234655">said</a>:</p>
<p>If both Peterson and Green are gone when we are there i believe this is are best option,that would mean most likely Gabbert is still on the board for them..</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d81f7f7de/article/redskins-look-to-move-up-in-draft-take-missouri-qb-gabbert?module=HP_headlines" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d81f7f7de/article/redskins-look-to-move-up-in-draft-take-missouri-qb-gabbert?module=HP_headlines</a></p>

</blockquote>


<p><span style="color:#8B0000">Essentially, this article says that the Redskins don't even have the assets valuable enough in this draft to trade up to #6 with the Browns to grab Gabbert or Locker.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#8B0000">What would you want in return for the Browns to move down to #10? They don't have a Round 2 pick.  How about next year's #1, plus like an additional 5th or 6th rounder in this draft.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8B0000">Would you make that deal?</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#8B0000">To recap:  Browns trade #6 to Wash. Get back #10 this year and next year's #1 and a 5th or 6th rounder this year?   Deal?</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/234679</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/234679</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:00:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Redskins Still Looking To Trade Up For Gabbert on Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:51:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If they don't have another pick this year until the 5th...forget trading with them.</p>

<p>I want some instant gratification in the deal...I am tired of waiting for next year.  I want to add players this year.</p>


<p>Then again...if Peterson and Green are gone....????</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/234663</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/234663</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ballpeen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:51:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Redskins Still Looking To Trade Up For Gabbert on Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:40:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/choco" aria-label="Profile: choco">@<bdi>choco</bdi></a> <a href="/post/234656">said</a>:</p>
<p>watt would be available at 10.....but they dont have many picks to deal with.  perhaps their first next year, as they likely be picking top 15 again anyway.  tough call....</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Yeah, that would be the price- or swap places, and it costs them their second this year. Question is do they value either QB highly enough to essentially trash this years draft- they don't have another pick until the 5th round.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/234658</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/234658</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:40:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Redskins Still Looking To Trade Up For Gabbert on Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:22:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>watt would be available at 10.....but they dont have many picks to deal with.  perhaps their first next year, as they likely be picking top 15 again anyway.  tough call....</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/234656</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/234656</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[choco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:22:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>