@diehardbrownsfan said:

I don't know, can't really feel the pain for a millionaire fighting a parking ticket.

He is fighting unfair tickets being written. He has clout that brings exposure to the situation. More people know about the issue now than before he got involved. This is more than a "millionaire fighting a parking ticket."

No, I prefer to believe that some attendent was under pressure to make $$$$ and cut nobody any slack, so

they gave the ticket, figuring it was going to run out anyway, before they would make their rounds again.

Otherwise, all they had to do was wait until the seven minutes ran out and then ticket. It isn't any crime

to put money in a meter for someone else, ahead of the parking ticket person. Whatever, it's a misunderstanding

on somebody's part, and if the city fights it, for 15 bucks and court costs? Then you know somethings el stinko

in BH. And there's no reason to put money in the meter for a car that has already been ticketed.

But in an interview, Cribbs had a sense of humor about it, but he's serious about fighting it.

@ballpeen said:

The judge can and should waive the court cost fee unless he or she runs a kangaroo court.

Charge it to the DA or Police Dept.

The charges would just be dismissed without any cost to anyone.

As for the post about not feeling the pain of a millionaire over a parking ticket, that is not the point at all. If the ticket was wrongly issued it shouldn't matter how wealthy the alleged perpetrator is.

Charge it to the DA or Police Dept.

Something is wrong with this picture. BTW you can get a parking ticket for something other than the meter being expired. You can be too far away from the curb, or over the lines etc. Not sure if that might be the case here.