@lemosley01 said:

You've listed 4 coaches who turned out well, while only listing 2 that didn't. I'll bet I can make the 'sucked to high heaven' list a lot longer than the 'guys who were successful making the jump from college directly to NFL HC'. Of the 4 coaches you listed, at least two of them came from big name, SUCCESSFUL programs, neither of which describes Iowa.

GENERALLY speaking, college coaches don't work out. Generally speaking, first time NFL head coaches haven't worked here in CLE.

PS: Please pay more attention to Mangini. You want to look at more than Ferentz win-loss record, while only considering Mangini's W-L record. Mangini has shown a hell of a lot more in the pros than Ferentz has. I'll definitely take him over the guy who's prior experience was 10 years ago in the NFL coaching one of the lines.

It appears we have Lumbergh redux...

Wow. Sorry. Just got back to the computer to see this.....Well, a few things.

1) Why is he a 'different guy' when he's making more money than you? Explain that. Automatically, ALL players that make more money than the coach is difficult to handle?!? Again, more broad strokes from you.

2) I listed those coaches as examples. I'm sure there are more on both sides. I'm just pointing out your overly general comments...which, then, you confirmed later in your own post. Thank you.

3) You don't think Iowa has been successful? 20 bowl games in 25 seasons, five conf. titles, three top 10 finishes in the past 6 years. Nine wins this season with 4 starting seniors....in IOWA! Not Ohio, not Texas, not Notre Dame, not Michigan, not California, not Florida.....I-O-W-A. Think about that.

4) Mangini will be fine. I'm not saying he won't be, just enough with the Ferentz-bashing. It's b.s. We'd be very fortunate to have him. What are we clinging to? The Chris Palmer era? Bring him in.

That's all. I'm done.

@hawkeye said:

Jimmy Johnson, Switzer, Parcells, Coughlin, Vermeil, etc...seemed to make the adjustment. Others like Pete Carrol, Butch Davis - not so much. It's just too general to make this assumption.

Ferentz is a good, solid coach with high integrity. I'd rather have a successful college coach than a NFL failure.

Of the players you mentioned, how many were pros when he 'dealt' with them? Different guy when he's making more jack than you are. Not the same game, not the same players. Handling pros isn't like handling a bunch of college kids. It just isn't.

You've listed 4 coaches who turned out well, while only listing 2 that didn't. I'll bet I can make the 'sucked to high heaven' list a lot longer than the 'guys who were successful making the jump from college directly to NFL HC'. Of the 4 coaches you listed, at least two of them came from big name, SUCCESSFUL programs, neither of which describes Iowa.

GENERALLY speaking, college coaches don't work out. Generally speaking, first time NFL head coaches haven't worked here in CLE.

PS: Please pay more attention to Mangini. You want to look at more than Ferentz win-loss record, while only considering Mangini's W-L record. Mangini has shown a hell of a lot more in the pros than Ferentz has. I'll definitely take him over the guy who's prior experience was 10 years ago in the NFL coaching one of the lines.

It appears we have Lumbergh redux...

@hawkeye said:

God, do you guys look up anything? It's a simple click on Google.

Please excuse our geriatric posters, Hawkeye. They are stuck in the 50's, permanently.

@solon16 said:

In 2002 and 2004 Iowa won the conference title....there is no championship game in the Big Ten.

God, do you guys look up anything? It's a simple click on Google.

@rich4eagle said:

The guy hasn't ever even won a big ten championship...no thanks on ferentz

@lemosley01 said:

We've tried inexperienced NFL Head Coaches 3 times now and it hasn't worked yet. Time to get someone with experience, IMO.

I find this to be generalizing way too much. Ferentz has pro experience and he dealt with Dallas Clark, Bob Sanders, Shonne Greene, Robert Gallery, etc...all looking to make their millions. In many ways, his career parallels Dick Vermeil's early career as an assistant with the Rams and, then, HC at UCLA..then, back to the pros. where, he was, again successful.

Jimmy Johnson, Switzer, Parcells, Coughlin, Vermeil, etc...seemed to make the adjustment. Others like Pete Carrol, Butch Davis - not so much. It's just too general to make this assumption.

Ferentz is a good, solid coach with high integrity. I'd rather have a successful college coach than a NFL failure.

@hawkeye said:

The Browns would be VERY fortunate to have Ferentz. With a piece of sh*t 4-12 record and a team that hasn't won a playoff game since before bottled water, we don't have a lot of room to get 'picky' with other discarded NFL coaches that have failed.

Ferentz has beaten Paterno, Spurrier, Carr, Saban, Leach and your precious Jim Tressel....with FAR less talent.

I'd hate to see him leave Iowa, but, if he had to leave, I'd be very happy it is with the Browns.

I agree.

@hawkeye said:

The Browns would be VERY fortunate to have Ferentz. With a piece of sh*t 4-12 record and a team that hasn't won a playoff game since before bottled water, we don't have a lot of room to get 'picky' with other discarded NFL coaches that have failed.

Ferentz has beaten Paterno, Spurrier, Carr, Saban, Leach and your precious Jim Tressel....with FAR less talent.

I'd hate to see him leave Iowa, but, if he had to leave, I'd be very happy it is with the Browns.

College isn't the Pros. He isn't dealing with kids looking to make their millions, he's dealing with guys who have already made them. There is a big difference in coaching. I'm not interested - Ferentz can go cut his teeth elsewhere; if we miss out, fine. I believe, if he makes it to the pros, he'll fail. Not because he's a bad college coach, but because it's the Pros and a very different game. It's hard for anyone to make the jump from College HC to Pro HC and be succesful. Notice that I'm also not calling for Meyer, Tressel, or Stoops, either? I don't WANT a college coach. It's nothing against Ferentz.

We've tried inexperienced NFL Head Coaches 3 times now and it hasn't worked yet. Time to get someone with experience, IMO.

@lemosley01 said:

This is the EXACT same thing Hawkeye fans were saying when Iowa missed out on Bobby Stoops and hired KF. The sky was falling, he had no experience, he wasn't the right guy for us, etc.....All crap.

The Browns would be VERY fortunate to have Ferentz. With a piece of sh*t 4-12 record and a team that hasn't won a playoff game since before bottled water, we don't have a lot of room to get 'picky' with other discarded NFL coaches that have failed.

Ferentz has beaten Paterno, Spurrier, Carr, Saban, Leach and your precious Jim Tressel....with FAR less talent.

I'd hate to see him leave Iowa, but, if he had to leave, I'd be very happy it is with the Browns.

Soblieski makes three points about Ferentz that I find really intriguing:

1. Many of Ferentz's big-time draft prospects successfully switched positions while at Iowa: Robert Gallery went from TE to OT, Steinbach went from TE to OG, Chad Greenway went from DB to LB, and Jonathan Babineaux went from FB to DT. Though this happens in all college programs, Soblieski thinks that Ferentz has been notably successful in making these position switches work.

   Considering how much some people here like to talk about how Wimbley is playing out of position and Cribbs is being underutilized, bringing in a coach with a knack for finding the best spots for his personnel would seem to be a positive (and popular) move.

2. I knew that Ferentz was known for employing a zone blocking scheme, but Sobleski says that Ferentz's broader offensive system is almost identical to the system Shanahan & Kubiak employ. Our athletic line (particularly our left side) would thrive in a ZBS, and many here think that BQ would fit best in a West Coast Offense. Even our pass-catching TE's seem like a perfect fit - look at the success Owen Daniels is having in Houston.

   If that's the case, then we're not dealing with a coach whose offensive system only works against mediocre college teams. In reality, Pioli may be looking to Ferentz as the guy whose system will get the most out of our current personnel.

3. Ferentz, as a former NFL OL coach, understands that games are won and lost in the trenches. Look at how many 1st Round picks New England has spent on DL & OL, and look at their success on both fronts (especially DL). Ferentz would bring the same philosophy and, hopefully, similar results in the win/loss column.

Though I'm a little bit wary of bringing in a coach who's been out of the league for ten years, I think Pioli deserves the benefit of the doubt on this one. As long as Ferentz brings in the right DC, I think he could be a big success in Cleveland.

@shepwrite said:

I still think it'll end up Pioli and McDaniels. That's what the latest from OBR seemed to imply.

McKay did a super job rebuilding Tampa Bay when he was GM and running the show. He developed Dungy. In Atlanta he is President and really has no say in football operations.

Can't see him giving full control to a HC.

Like what Jack del Rio used to be before he started wearing that dipshit leather Jags trenchcoat.

mz. said:

They worked out for a year so far, we'll see down the road.

The NFL is a reactionary, copycat league. I think sometimes people are too quick to coronate someone the next greatest thing or the vestige of failure.

Zombo said:

Those were beyond-bland choices that I shook my head at but ultimately worked out, I guess. Perhaps we'll have similar luck...

@dawg-pound said:

Shit may have been a bad choice on my part, given that they played a last place/4-12 schedule, just like ours last year. They did play CAR/TB/NO twice, but they also had DEN, KC, DET, OAK, GB and STL on the schedule. Not the toughest, not the easiest. I give them credit, and I like them.

Lets see how they do in 2009 with a first place schedule. They are a feel good team this season and I like the make up of the roster, and the FO.

And hey, Smith came in a took advantage of a team that signed M Turner and kicked ass. Not even RAC could do that.

I guess my point is that Sparano, Smith and Harbaugh all played last place schedules, and while they had very successful seasons, it was one season. With the Browns, I would sleep better at night knowing we could get Pioli and Shanahan. Knowing that is not going to happen, I'd settle for Schwartz and Pioli/Mckay.

@playoffsin09 said:

I hope beyond hope that Pioli is the guy to get this organization going in the right direction.

At the same time, I worry about those reports that say that Pioli favors a coach like Ferentz when accomplished people like Shannahan, Holmgren, etc., etc, etc, are possibly available.

I'd prefer Elmer Fudd to that Fuddin' Ferentz.

Talk about taking all the luster off the shine.

@dawg-pound said:

he's a football guy who made a bad call. Do we need to list all of the first round busts?

ATL schedule was weak - opponents had 88 wins, 119 losses, and 1 tie. Winning % of .423. That's a weak schedule. Sorry it doesn't fit with your theory.

@vegasdogg said:

Atlanta did well, and so did Miami. They also played shit schedules. I know we'll play a shit schedule next season, I am concerned about the year after when we play "that" schedule.

We'll see how Sparano and Harbaugh and Smith do in 2009.

Atlanta didnt play a shit schedule. They played the NFC south (no teams with a losing record in the division), Vikings are a playoff team, Denver, Chargers a playoff team. That schedule wasnt easy at all.

@dawg-pound said:

The Ravens were a good team. They had no HC worth a shit after his D could not bail him out.

Atlanta did well, and so did Miami. They also played shit schedules. I know we'll play a shit schedule next season, I am concerned about the year after when we play "that" schedule.

We'll see how Sparano and Harbaugh and Smith do in 2009.

@lemosley01 said:

We have none of that. They also haven't really accomplished anything yet. Let's see what happens next year when they are playing a much tougher schedule. We've seen ourselves that one good season may just be fool's gold.

Arthur Blank gave Vick a huge extension, he doesn't have a clue at all

@dawg-pound said:

The Ravens have a stable front office. ATL has Arthur Blank, who actually has a clue, and Rich McKay.

We have none of that. They also haven't really accomplished anything yet. Let's see what happens next year when they are playing a much tougher schedule. We've seen ourselves that one good season may just be fool's gold.

@vegasdogg said:

Tomlin took over a good team. We don't have a good team. We may have good players, but not a good team.

That said Ferentz is not my pick - not by a long shot.

Ravens, Falcons werent good teams and they hired coaches like that.

@rich4eagle said:

I agree. If Ferentz is hired, I'm on the wagon with Ghoolie and Rich.

Tomlin took over a good team. We don't have a good team. We may have good players, but not a good team.

That said Ferentz is not my pick - not by a long shot.