It must be hard to form a coherent argument when you find your foot shoved so far down your mouth all the time, you secret pinko.

UNWARRANTED personal attacks,

and personal attacks returned in kind.

it's online self-defense. I've tried to respect your dumbarse opinions for a long while,

but then you started going vulgar, ballistic, and repulsively hatemongering...

and your post was pulled.

After that, it was bicker as your are bickered with.

IOW's, you reap what you sow. Take personal responsibility for your acti....no, nevermind.

You are an entitlement willy-nilly, "cater to me because I'm special elitist wimp, so let me be harsh,

but shame on you if you are harsh back"

You libs love to dish it out. But you can't take it. Hateful hissy.

You only love polls that happen to fit your sick and twisted idealogy.

If they don't fit, they are really bad polls.

We get it. You and your other libs thrive ego-wise on opposing the status quo wherever you find it .

Alright folks, time to pick apart another delusional rambling by our resident moron. Notice how he posts this as I post a topic on how professors at Harvard and Notre Dame have concluded that the Tea Party is the most hated group in America. Note that the date of my link is from a few days ago.

Again, read Cal's quote above. See how he attacks me for only looking at things I want to read. Now let's look at a topic posted by cal in response to my topic.

http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=19990

Zero replies. Hrm.

Anyways, let's take a look at the link he posted in this topic.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2009/12/16/4435425-tea-party-more-popular-than-dems-gop

This post claims that the tea party is more popular than dems and gop. Okay, this may have been true at some point. Let's check the date.

December 16, 2009. Two years ago. Also note that cal used a liberally biased source in MSNBC. Somebody call McCarthy, I think that cal might be a secret socialist!

So, cal, sits here, as I'm sure you all know, unaware that his hypocrisy is showing. Hell, he will probably even deny that he has been schooled, even though you can read it plain as day. But maybe I'm wrong. Maybe there is something I missed in his latest post that would redeem him.

Sure, but if you'd just quit with your whining, I'd let it drop. Try it and see, doofus weasel....

I just draw the line at ... completely unprovoked personal attacks.

Oh. Nope. Guess not.

If they don't fit, they are really bad polls.

We get it. You and your other libs thrive ego-wise on opposing the status quo wherever you find it .

I just draw the line at perversion and extremely excessive pouty pouty whining and completely unprovoked personal attacks.

Is this how desperately you are going to keep your little ignorant thread alive?

When your "precious" Obamao has a new all-time lowest approval rating? (I think it's 38 percent)

Vaporized translation: "We musn't say nothing bad about our precious-s-s-s-s-s"

@calfoxwc said:

Oh. You learned in hs that judges' decisions on breakfast is law?

Idiot.

lol, is this really the route you're going to take?

Idiot.

@calfoxwc said:

And, btw, legal decisions are not political decisions. They are based on the freakin LAW.

That is, unless it's a gay, marxist, corrupt "activist" judge who makes up his/her as they are told..... by the left....

Politicians pass gas, but that doesn't make gas politics.

Judges decide the merits of what they are having new for breakfast, but that doesn't make it law.

Good grief, Vaporized. Do you read "Bizarro" superman comic books at your age?

Sounds like someone didn't graduate their American government class in high school.

@calfoxwc said:

Great. now Vaporized is an expert on perversion unions and animal sexual perceptions.

Must be really tough classes in "med science" dude.

When do you graduate from the Liberace Medical School for Animals?

That is, unless it's a gay, marxist, corrupt "activist" judge who makes up his/her as they are told..... by the left....

Politicians pass gas, but that doesn't make gas politics.

Judges decide the merits of what they are having new for breakfast, but that doesn't make it law.

Good grief, Vaporized. Do you read "Bizarro" superman comic books at your age?

Must be really tough classes in "med science" dude.

When do you graduate from the Liberace Medical School for Animals?

I would bet that given a GENUINE POLL, the most hated group in America, is the group who wants to

legalize the gay "marriage" fraud.

@hoorta said:

You're right. gay marriage isn't a political issue- it's a legal issue- as to what constitutes a "legal" marriage. Between "persons". Well, go look up your history and find out Native Americans weren't considered "Persons" back when. I'm all for declaring cows & sheep "persons" so you can marry them- that's next on the agenda.

And the legality of the issue is decided by whom? The judicial branch of the government. So, by your logic, the judicial branch of the government isn't a political entity? Is that what you're trying to say?

And the if we let gays marry, then we'll let sheep marry argument needs to stop, it's xxxxing laughable, and you're comparing apples and oranges. One system involves consent between two sentient organisms. The other just allows someone to submit an animal to sex.

@vaportrail said:

lol, because gay marriage isn't a political issue. Get real. Politicians are discussing it.

And guess what, Obama has made it clear that people who don't have faith should be included in political discourse.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but them's the breaks.

You're right. gay marriage isn't a political issue- it's a legal issue- as to what constitutes a "legal" marriage. Between "persons". Well, go look up your history and find out Native Americans weren't considered "Persons" back when. I'm all for declaring cows & sheep "persons" so you can marry them- that's next on the agenda.

@vaportrail said:

lol, because gay marriage isn't a political issue. Get real. Politicians are discussing it.

And guess what, Obama has made it clear that people who don't have faith should be included in political discourse.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but them's the breaks.

It is nice see someone who actually uses logic to create a view...........good for you

@pumpkin-eater said:

meh. Not every Christian wants to mingle government and politics. Most Christians are moderate and not radical.

Change the ugly logo that would be moderate instead of radical

And guess what, Obama has made it clear that people who don't have faith should be included in political discourse.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but them's the breaks.

criticizing Obamaofor his dramatic failures and anti-America crap. You know, he's our "president"...

Bunker said:

Maybe we should legalize gay marriage that way the surviving spouse will have to pick up the medical bills of the deceased after they die from aids. Dont give up hope Trails, soon the 98% of americans who are straight may give in to the bully tactics that all you queens use and let you share that precious moment in some weirded out way in front of an alter and get married.

I don't know whether to find it funny or sad that it's 2011 and you still think AIDS is a disease that only gays get.

And yes, they change, and the people polled change,

and ....

it doesn't matter. Want me to find a better one? LOL

I call baloney.

"David E. Campbell, an associate professor of political science at Notre Dame, and Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, are the authors of “American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us.” "

Please. I'm being nice in only saying that's "dumb".....

you all are the ones who want government to decide in your favor, vs the status quo.

We know what marriage is, and don't want to live in some warped, perverted "utopia"

by progressive anti-status, anti-American leftist design. The majority of Americans aren't favoring

changing what marriage is. Your point?

@pumpkin-eater said:

meh. Not every Christian wants to mingle government and politics. Most Christians are moderate and not radical.

Most Christians aren't in the Tea Party.

And Bunker, not sure what point you're trying to make with the C&L article. It's basically only this paragraph

Sounds like this is the point Democrats should hit over and over again: That this nation was founded on religious freedom (and now includes the freedom not to worship) and we don't need elected officials interfering with that. Once we breach the wall separating church and state, we're no longer America.

Maybe I'm misreading it, but that seems to agree with the point of view from the original article.

And while the public image of the Tea Party focuses on a desire to shrink government, concern over big government is hardly the only or even the most important predictor of Tea Party support among voters.

Right, and I find it hypocritical that they are so vocal about big government, except when it comes to the gays. Government needs to step in and say gays can't marry. Government needs to step in and say we are a Christian nation. It's inconsistent.