<![CDATA[Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons]]>I got so tired of hearing about the Falcons and Ryan. Glad they got kicked to the curb ... let's watch them play through a real schedule next season with film on Ryan now present.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/2032/buh-bye-atlanta-falconsRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 06:49:39 GMTSun, 04 Jan 2009 00:45:11 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:14:47 GMT]]>I will never extend a congrats to Baltiwhore

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27799https://brownsboard.com/post/27799Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:14:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:59:43 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

Flacco & Harbaugh don't get nearly the love that Matt Ryan gets on his own ... and that is one reason I say that Atlanta is over-rated ... maybe I should have said over-hyped.

Congrats to the Flacco, Harbaugh & the Ravens

Of course Flacco and Harbaugh have that D behind them, which ATL ain't close to. BALT won today by forcing 5 turnovers. They also didn't have to over come the Vick and Pietrino debacle either.

Flacco and Harbaugh deserve love, but not as much as ATL. ATL had more to over come, got more out of a rookie QB, and played in a much tougher division.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27786https://brownsboard.com/post/27786Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:59:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:56:43 GMT]]>

Masters said:

For a team w/ a rookie HC and rookie QB, that was an impressive season for them.

Flacco & Harbaugh don't get nearly the love that Matt Ryan gets on his own ... and that is one reason I say that Atlanta is over-rated ... maybe I should have said over-hyped.

Congrats to the Flacco, Harbaugh & the Ravens

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27785https://brownsboard.com/post/27785Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:56:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:04:53 GMT]]>

@wvbrownsfan said:

I wouldn't say the Falcons were over-rated, the Browns were.

I'd say the Browns underchieved in a huge magnatued.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27377https://brownsboard.com/post/27377Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:04:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:53:36 GMT]]>I wouldn't say the Falcons were over-rated, the Browns were.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27369https://brownsboard.com/post/27369Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:53:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:26:31 GMT]]>

@shepwrite said:

It is so weird how much of a brain drain Ghoolie has been on this entire board.

The Falcons were OVER rated? THEY WEREN'T EVEN RATED!!!!

AAAAAAHHHHHHHRGGGGG!

No kidding Shep, no kidding.

But there is a reason they remained absent for quite some time.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27364https://brownsboard.com/post/27364Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:26:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:25:14 GMT]]>

@rich4eagle said:

That is not relevant............attacking Atenears for using statistics that matter and moreso attacking Rich for supporting Atenears and using even more statistics is what matters.........

facts are of no consequence in this thread...............

So Lumbergh you are way outta line............and a confirmed Dubmsbhshiet like Atenears and a dumbsheiet and lowlife scoundrel like Rich

Better than using bs and claiming it as facts.

For Lum, the more important thing, Ryan didnt' give away a game and his team won their last 3 when it mattered.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27362https://brownsboard.com/post/27362Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:25:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:21:24 GMT]]>That is not relevant............attacking Atenears for using statistics that matter and moreso attacking Rich for supporting Atenears and using even more statistics is what matters.........

facts are of no consequence in this thread...............

So Lumbergh you are way outta line............and a confirmed Dubmsbhshiet like Atenears and a dumbsheiet and lowlife scoundrel like Rich

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27360https://brownsboard.com/post/27360Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:21:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:16:39 GMT]]>

@jc said:

Ryan got better with every game. Opposite of what DA did in 2007. Atlanta is on the rise.

Ryan had 3 TDs and 5 picks in his last 4 regular season games.

And all 4 games were played in domes against non-playoff teams.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27358https://brownsboard.com/post/27358Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:16:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:16:29 GMT]]>Thanks make yourself clear in grand style of a whiner...............I wish the best for you and wish for you to root for whomever you wish and believe whatever you wish and wish you no harm.........and wish you had the ability to debate rather than insult..

So your intent was clear...........or fuzzy........certainly the other side is a message wishing less than warmth and life...

but this is certain...........you are whiney crybaby.....because that is what your post was whiney crybabying......but my fellow American and Browns fan.........love yah 🙄

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27357https://brownsboard.com/post/27357Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:16:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:06:28 GMT]]>

@rich4eagle said:

So you wish me dead......you are such a man........priceless post.......priceless.........and moronic

Read into what you think - at least again you will twist to benefit your own version.

Idiot. Pass on to the other side - as in, go root for some other team.

Assclown.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27355https://brownsboard.com/post/27355Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:06:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 02:02:17 GMT]]>

@rich4eagle said:

Boom Atenears............gets it again Correctomundo............defeat dat boyz!!!!!!!!!!!

🙄

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27300https://brownsboard.com/post/27300Sun, 04 Jan 2009 02:02:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 02:01:27 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

In Atlanta's last three games Turner & Co actually out-rushed Ryan's passing (536 rushing yards to 476 passing). Is that apples for apples with DA last season?

Actually in his last 3 regular season games, Ryan had 500 passing yards (206+134+160). But you are correct in the assertion DA was asked to throw more in his last 3 games last year. But he was neither a rookie, and had more than a 3 game slide.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27298https://brownsboard.com/post/27298Sun, 04 Jan 2009 02:01:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:55:00 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

A golf-clap for going 6-5 in those games, but their remaining five opponents had a 15-65 combined record.

Their opponents had a 117-138 overall record.

That is true. But you can say that about most of the teams in the NFL.

But how many times in NFL history have the combination of a 1st time HC and QBs do that? It's been more than 50 years since that has been done.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27296https://brownsboard.com/post/27296Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:55:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:53:17 GMT]]>

@jc said:

Ryan got better with every game. Opposite of what DA did in 2007. Atlanta is on the rise.

In Atlanta's last three games Turner & Co actually out-rushed Ryan's passing (536 rushing yards to 476 passing). Is that apples for apples with DA last season?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27294https://brownsboard.com/post/27294Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:53:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:51:29 GMT]]>

@rich4eagle said:

Is plus 4 plus 4 or is it some other number........................please explain...............PLUS 4 is not plus 4............

Which team in the NFC won 11 games and missed the playoffs..........answer none.........

you should be a pretzel all you do is twist reality

Keep proving me right da Ich. I love it. Especially since this thread was never about AFC or NFC being better. Spin, spin, spin, spin.

And how is it pretzel logic by pointing out the AFC got to face DET 4 times exactly? It's just reality. They did. Would you rather I point out beating up on the AFC west, which didn't have a single team w/ a winning record?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27293https://brownsboard.com/post/27293Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:51:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:48:53 GMT]]>

Masters said:

You do realize that 11 of their games were against teams that were .500 or better.

A golf-clap for going 6-5 in those games, but their remaining five opponents had a 15-65 combined record.

Their opponents had a 117-138 overall record.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27292https://brownsboard.com/post/27292Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:48:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:42:28 GMT]]>Is plus 4 plus 4 or is it some other number........................please explain...............PLUS 4 is not plus 4............

Which team in the NFC won 11 games and missed the playoffs..........answer none.........

you should be a pretzel all you do is twist reality

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27289https://brownsboard.com/post/27289Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:42:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:41:11 GMT]]>

@rich4eagle said:

AFC plus 4 against the NFC ...................boom you are all toasted by Retardo me...............correctomundo as usual............change the topic on that boyz

Huh? What does that toast?

Not to mention that has as much to do about which division had to face which. Any AFC team that got to face the NFC north or West was at quite the advantage. Oh, and DET had to face 4 AFC teams. So there are your +4 against the NFC. boom you are toasted by Retardo me...............correctomundo as usual............change the topic on that boyz

Thanks for proving my point on the topic change. Seeing as how it was about ATL, and who they beat. Including that SD team you said would beat them if they played them. How about CAR?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27287https://brownsboard.com/post/27287Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:41:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:32:31 GMT]]>

@dtbh said:

Ryan isn't DARetard, he'll progress and grow as a quarterback. The Falcs will be around for a while.

With Turner, Norwood, Ryan, White, and Jenkins on O, they will be for sure.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27285https://brownsboard.com/post/27285Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:32:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:32:03 GMT]]>AFC plus 4 against the NFC ...................boom you are all toasted by Retardo me...............correctomundo as usual............change the topic on that boyz

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27284https://brownsboard.com/post/27284Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:32:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:31:26 GMT]]>Ryan isn't DARetard, he'll progress and grow as a quarterback. The Falcs will be around for a while.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27283https://brownsboard.com/post/27283Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:31:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:17:24 GMT]]>

@bigbrownsfan said:

Good stuff. But dont argue facts with the resident Retard. He is back down in his basement sniffing agent orange.

Oh, I know him all to well. Facts only result in changing the subject or other conviluted posts.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27278https://brownsboard.com/post/27278Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:17:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Buh-Bye Atlanta Falcons on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:14:41 GMT]]>

Masters said:

They played SD and won by 6 points (22-16). Guess they wouldn't have been pounded by them, huh?

So you think CAR is weak? They beat them and bad in their second meeting (45-28).

AFC is tough? They have 1 division where no one can get over .500, 1 division with 2 teams under .500, and a 3rd where 1 team is below .500 and one at .500.

Good stuff. But dont argue facts with the resident Retard. He is back down in his basement sniffing agent orange.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/27275https://brownsboard.com/post/27275Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:14:41 GMT