<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Three Musketeers Review]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Three Musketeers</strong></p>
<p><strong>Summit Entertainment</strong></p>
<p><strong>PG 13        110 min</strong></p>

<p><strong>OK gang it’s time for a little guilty pleasure. </strong></p>
<p><strong>As you know I won’t look at any other reviews until I’ve finished but after I’d settled on a grade for this one I looked at the Critic to Viewer ratio.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Though I certainly didn’t expect a love fest, I was surprised to see how badly the critics hated this one.  Oh, to be sure, I understand why, but gee whiz…</strong></p>
<p><strong>Actually, even though it’s been used more times than Rick James’ crack pipe,   the story is one of the easiest of all                time to hammer into an entertaining f movie. </strong></p>
<p><strong>And surprisingly enough, director Paul W S Anderson (not Ghoulardi’s kid) known for his film adaptations of videogames and uber-bore PSANDORUM has actually managed to cobble together a couple decent hours of entertainment.</strong></p>
<p><strong>You know the drill. With the young and feckless king Louis XIII on the throne of France the evil Cardinal Richelieu Christoph Waltz) is pulling the strings of power.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Three royal guardsmen Athos Porthos and Aramis (not to be confused with Donatello Raphael and Michelangelo) are unceremoniously booted from their position. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Here, as in many versions, the three are accompanied by D’Artagnan, the boy wonder, and will respond to some injustice or treachery and once again save France. </strong></p>
<p><strong>But, as I said, the critics hate it. Well the acting really isn’t very good, never rising above what’s found on the CW network. </strong></p>
<p><strong>The three main musketeers have British accents (they usually do) and D’Artagnan (Logan Lerman) sounds like he’s from Van Nuys.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Even the usually excellent Waltz seems to be hamstrung by the writers. Also the plot against the king involving Lord Buckingham and a fleet of 18th century flying battleships                                  is pretty ridiculous.</strong></p>
<p><strong>C’ est la vie. Even with mediocre acting and embarrassingly silly storyline, I noticed that 45 minutes in I wasn’t bored or annoyed. Quite the opposite. This thing is actually a great deal of fun, especially if you’re up for a whole lot of swashbuckling. Oh sure it’s rife with clichés short on originality and lacking any great performances but all those elements that make for a fun yarn are there. It’s a hook that never really changes over the years and never really gets old.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I started out with C-, went to C to C+ and settled on B-.</strong></p>

<p><strong>WSS</strong></p>

<p><strong>Email westsidesteve@aol.com</strong></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/20853/the-three-musketeers-review</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 03:33:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/20853.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:59:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Three Musketeers Review on Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:04:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/256375">said</a>:</p>
<p><strong>The Three Musketeers</strong></p>
<p><strong>Summit Entertainment</strong></p>
<p><strong>PG 13        110 min</strong></p>

<p><strong>OK gang it’s time for a little guilty pleasure. </strong></p>
<p><strong>As you know I won’t look at any other reviews until I’ve finished but after I’d settled on a grade for this one I looked at the Critic to Viewer ratio.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Though I certainly didn’t expect a love fest, I was surprised to see how badly the critics hated this one.  Oh, to be sure, I understand why, but gee whiz…</strong></p>
<p><strong>Actually, even though it’s been used more times than Rick James’ crack pipe,   the story is one of the easiest of all                time to hammer into an entertaining f movie. </strong></p>
<p><strong>And surprisingly enough, director Paul W S Anderson (not Ghoulardi’s kid) known for his film adaptations of videogames and uber-bore PSANDORUM has actually managed to cobble together a couple decent hours of entertainment.</strong></p>
<p><strong>You know the drill. With the young and feckless king Louis XIII on the throne of France the evil Cardinal Richelieu Christoph Waltz) is pulling the strings of power.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Three royal guardsmen Athos Porthos and Aramis (not to be confused with Donatello Raphael and Michelangelo) are unceremoniously booted from their position. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Here, as in many versions, the three are accompanied by D’Artagnan, the boy wonder, and will respond to some injustice or treachery and once again save France. </strong></p>
<p><strong>But, as I said, the critics hate it. Well the acting really isn’t very good, never rising above what’s found on the CW network. </strong></p>
<p><strong>The three main musketeers have British accents (they usually do) and D’Artagnan (Logan Lerman) sounds like he’s from Van Nuys.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Even the usually excellent Waltz seems to be hamstrung by the writers. Also the plot against the king involving Lord Buckingham and a fleet of 18th century flying battleships                                  is pretty ridiculous.</strong></p>
<p><strong>C’ est la vie. Even with mediocre acting and embarrassingly silly storyline, I noticed that 45 minutes in I wasn’t bored or annoyed. Quite the opposite. This thing is actually a great deal of fun, especially if you’re up for a whole lot of swashbuckling. Oh sure it’s rife with clichés short on originality and lacking any great performances but all those elements that make for a fun yarn are there. It’s a hook that never really changes over the years and never really gets old.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I started out with C-, went to C to C+ and settled on B-.</strong></p>

<p><strong>WSS</strong></p>

<p><strong>Email westsidesteve@aol.com</strong></p>

</blockquote>

<p>yeah but you didn't even mention them including a runway model as one of their mooketears? what's up with that?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/257305</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/257305</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[miktoxic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:04:09 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>