@loyalty said:

Colts, Rams, Dolphins, Titans... Takes quite a bit away from even our 6 tough Division Games.

Considering they'll have played (in all likelihood) playoff teams in the Bengals, Ravens, Steelers (all twice), 49ers, Texans & Raiders, that's 9 games out of 16 against top-shelf competition. Of the remaining 7, they've beat who they should've save for the Rams, which would've been a win except for, dare I say it, 1 play (the botched field goal). I don't get where some are saying it's an easy schedule.

I do like the point about the 5 or 6 plays not even having to happen to your own team - the example being the Jackson punt return vs. the Giants last year, or the non-catch by Kellen Winslow @ the end of the Cardinals game in 2007 which would've put the Browns in the playoffs. Very astute...

My pick for the 2011 version of the 2010 Chiefs (worst to first to worst)is the 49ers - a few key injuries or substandard play by no more than 3 or 4 guys turns the team from 12 wins to 6.

@cdl15 said:

No they don't!!!

Colts, Rams, Dolphins, Titans... Takes quite a bit away from even our 6 tough Division Games.

@king-ghoolie-lives said:

We have the weakest schedule in the NFL.....

@soju said:

I agree. Keep this crap kid Colt in there and build some players around him.

Colt was on target against the Bengals. Showed some real poise, FINALLY!

WRs dropped it like it was hot.

Until that point, we are constantly going to be in a status of 'building', not 'rebuilding'. The only thing we have rebuilt is mediocrity.

There are a few potential free agents coming after this season and I am hoping Desean Jackson is one of them. He was drafted by Heckert and lets face it, we need that talent at WR, even if it is between moments of Retarded antics. At least he can catch.

I think the best teams don't have to rely on those funky plays, although I think last year if DeSean Jackson didn't have that amazing return vs the Giants(when the punter was supposed to kick it out of bounds), the Packers wouldn't have even gotten in the playoffs? and they ended up being the champs.

As much as I dislike the FO/coaching staff, we have some good young players. Raw, but talented. Little, Titus brown, English, paxson, pinky, Norwood, obi.....they'll be goood starters and rotational guys. If we stay the course, I'm hopeful. Holes will be filled, game plans will be expanded. The last 3 games are a stark contrast to the first 8.

Colt will be sufficient for this team to succeed. Build the O next draft, skip FA one more year and we'll be a perennial playoff team starting in 2013. Its not as bad as it seems.

As much as we could have beat the bengals and rams we could have lost against the jags, dolphins, colts and seattle.

We have had an easy schedule so far. I hate everthing about the front office and the direction they are going.

But I want to be wrong, I would like to see them compete against the ravens and steelers

There's a very, very, very faint bright spot, but it's something an eternal optimist like myself can grasp onto.

Wer'e showing...improvement might be a strong word, but maybe adaptation? Shurmur is showing that he has the ability to adapt, however so slightly, and he may actually have the knowledge to change his system which has obviously been coming up short this season. I suppose we'll see how it goes for the rest of the season, but I'd say our week 11 team is leaps and bounds ahead of our week 1 team, at least offensively.

On another note, less statistical and more...whatever:

There's similarities between Cleveland and Denver. Denver started the year off like us, with a new coach, a new offense and a switch from the 3-4 to the 4-3. They've shown progression throughout the season, but a noticeable jump in performance with Tebow at the helm. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Tebow himself is the reason. Von Miller is playing out of his mind and their entire defense is working together very well. Tebow's more of a catalyst.

He brings a winning mentality to the team, but more than anything he makes those around him play better. The reports out of the Denver locker room are the proof that lies in the pudding: he's constantly hyping and reinforcing his teammates, singing their praises and not calling them out. And that is what makes the difference in a win and a loss.

Like you said, each game can be attributed to a couple of plays. Those plays turn out differently, the momentum shifts and it's a completely different ball game. I believe that's where the "Tebow factor" (for lack of a better term) comes in. You get your guys to play at a level above their natural talent, to play their hardest until the final whistle, and that's where the wins come from. From those 5 or 6 plays that should have gone the other way, but didn't. From a nickelback who makes a completely uncharacteristic diving pass deflection on a critical third down pass. Or a 4th WR who has been lulling his defender to sleep only to catch a long bomb down the sideline.

That's where you start to grind out your wins.

All the great teams are the teams that win those 5 or 6 plays. You think the sheer level of talent is that much of a difference between Pittsburgh and Cleveland? Don't get me wrong, Pittsburgh has a whole stable of extremely talented players at the top end of their roster that Cleveland doesn't have. But I'm talking about those other guys, the other 40 or so players that make up the active roster, suit up for Pittsburgh and play on Sundays. There's not much difference in those guys compared to our guys. The only difference is that Pittsburgh's "other guys", or Denver's "other guys", or Green Bay's "other guys" play a hell of a lot harder than our "other guys". And that's because somebody instilled in them that they are just as good as anybody else in the league.

The St. Louis game, the Oakland game, the San Fran game, both Cincinnati games- they've all shown Cleveland doesn't quite know how to grind out those ugly wins.

You want to be a champion, you have to start by winning ugly.

The who pretty much define my life of rootin' for the Browns: