<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why Isn't Spiking The Ball Considered Intentional Grounding?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Dumb question, I know. It's just something I couldn't fully understand. Does it have something to do with them being in a certain formation to be a legal play? I know in Madden, the spike ball play is listed under special teams, wouldn't that mean they have to have their special teams unit on the field to run the play?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/21802/why-isn-t-spiking-the-ball-considered-intentional-grounding</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 04:49:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/21802.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:42:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why Isn't Spiking The Ball Considered Intentional Grounding? on Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:30:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/273130">said</a>:</p>
<p>I think it's because the immediateness of it negates the claim that the qb is doing it to avoid a sack.</p>

<p>So, it is allowed because the intent is to simply and immediately stop the clock.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Exactly!</p>

<p>The official rule is:</p>
<p>"Intentional grounding will be called when a passer, facing an imminent loss of yardage due to pressure from the defense, throws a forward pass without a realistic chance of completion."</p>
<p>---</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/273139</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/273139</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tennreb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:30:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why Isn't Spiking The Ball Considered Intentional Grounding? on Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:55:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/273130">said</a>:</p>
<p>I think it's because the immediateness of it negates the claim that the qb is doing it to avoid a sack.</p>

<p>So, it is allowed because the intent is to simply and immediately stop the clock.</p>

</blockquote>
<p>That makes sense, thanks. I always thought it was a loop-hole in the NFL rule book.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/273132</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/273132</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:55:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why Isn't Spiking The Ball Considered Intentional Grounding? on Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:52:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I think it's because the immediateness of it negates the claim that the qb is doing it to avoid a sack.</p>

<p>So, it is allowed because the intent is to simply and immediately stop the clock.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/273130</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/273130</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:52:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>