<![CDATA[Micheal Bush?]]>Was watching NFL Network and they said if Hillis leaves Cleveland that Micheal Bush may be signed to take his place, Whats your guys thoughts on this??

Personally i think it would be a pretty good sign if we could get him for the right price..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/21891/micheal-bushRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 03:34:01 GMTFri, 02 Mar 2012 17:52:06 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:02:04 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

I hear Terry Kirby is still in good shape.

Z

And Boyce Green and Ben Gay may be looking to get back into the league.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275378https://brownsboard.com/post/275378Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:02:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:43:25 GMT]]>Bush is slow, and would have 1 or 2 decent years as a starting running back. In Cleveland, he would have a ho-hum 800yds 6Tds

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275071https://brownsboard.com/post/275071Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:43:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:07:24 GMT]]>if we don't sign a running back or re-sign hillis WE will be getting a back in the first round be it Richardson or Wilson or Turbin(the incredible hulk) in the 2nd or 3rd. If we resign hillis and or get bush i think they will go after rg3...if we lose out on both, we will need a back in the first or 2nd round.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275067https://brownsboard.com/post/275067Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:07:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:05:10 GMT]]>I get the math. But Bush doesn't cost you a first round pick. Here's hoping the brain trust has a better plan for those 2 ones.

-jj

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275066https://brownsboard.com/post/275066Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:05:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:27:01 GMT]]>michael bush we are looking probably could be picked up for around 3.3 - 3.5 million...if we take trent we are looking at spending about 5.2 -5.5 million for four years at #4 if we can swap with lets say the dolphins at #8 probably could get trent for around the 3.5 million mark for 4 years.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275063https://brownsboard.com/post/275063Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:27:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:55:00 GMT]]>I love Bush and think that he can be our feature back, but I dont think he is better than Hillis.

Hillis is a better reciever, blocker and is a little more atheletic.

Bush is a good reciever, doesnt fumble as much and is more durable.

Other than that they are pretty similar backs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275046https://brownsboard.com/post/275046Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:55:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:19:44 GMT]]>Bush has solid hands. He actually a better natural receiver than Hillis.

Depending on the price, he could be a quality investment for the Browns.

-jj

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275035https://brownsboard.com/post/275035Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:19:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:17:01 GMT]]>

@pizzadeliveryguy said:

He caught 37 balls this past year. And screw the price. Bush is the goods, he would be a major upgrade over Hillis.

Yea 37 is a decent number I dont know how many of those were just dump offs.. I just dont know how his hands are and I dont think 37 receptions tells you that theyre fine..

Just watched this:

Not many receptions at all, but rushing-wise he looks like a faster Peyton Hillis. Id be excited, I like the idea of getting a free agent running back at this point just because of the opportunity costs of drafting one.. Id just be wary not too commit to any RB for more than 4 years with significant guaranteed money..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275034https://brownsboard.com/post/275034Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:17:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:04:56 GMT]]>I agree with pizza, IMO Bush is better than Peyton, id take him inna heartbeat even if we keep hillis.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275032https://brownsboard.com/post/275032Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:04:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:59:28 GMT]]>

@cribbs-is-the-man said:

My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..

He caught 37 balls this past year. And screw the price. Bush is the goods, he would be a major upgrade over Hillis.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275031https://brownsboard.com/post/275031Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:59:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:56:20 GMT]]>My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275028https://brownsboard.com/post/275028Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:56:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:24:20 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

As long as we don't take Richardson at 4

Of Course thats a given, if we were interstred in Richardson id say trade down a least a few spots and then grab him....He may slip out of the Top 10

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275012https://brownsboard.com/post/275012Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:24:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Micheal Bush? on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:12:08 GMT]]>As long as we don't take Richardson at 4

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275011https://brownsboard.com/post/275011Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:12:08 GMT