<![CDATA[Joe Thomas For #2]]>I seen this on another board just wanted to see what peoples take on this board would be.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/21893/joe-thomas-for-2RSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 10:43:27 GMTFri, 02 Mar 2012 19:05:56 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:48:26 GMT]]>cuz theres nothing wrong with asking a question just cuz you might be totally against it 12 other ppl say different

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/276155https://brownsboard.com/post/276155Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:48:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:19:00 GMT]]>WHY IS THIS THREAD STILL OPEN???

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/276147https://brownsboard.com/post/276147Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:19:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:14:40 GMT]]>Every insider at ESPN has Joe Thomas as a top five player to build a franchise around. Next......

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/276146https://brownsboard.com/post/276146Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:14:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:43:56 GMT]]>

@hammertime said:

change the question to say luck for thomas.

then you'll peek the interest of a few more.

all the effort put forth to get rg3 should be a parralell effort to pry luck away from the colts.

Never ever ever going to happen. Ever.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275807https://brownsboard.com/post/275807Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:43:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:03:20 GMT]]>

@hammertime said:

change the question to say luck for thomas.

then you'll peek the interest of a few more.

all the effort put forth to get rg3 should be a parralell effort to pry luck away from the colts.

Now you're talking

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275728https://brownsboard.com/post/275728Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:03:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:12:10 GMT]]>

@jason-j said:

You're entitled to your opinion. But, in the play you're referring to, James Harrison was in coverage, not being blocked by the left tackle.

-jj

not to worry....girley never worries about facts when he can just make shit up to support his points.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275701https://brownsboard.com/post/275701Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:12:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:31:13 GMT]]>change the question to say luck for thomas.

then you'll peek the interest of a few more.

all the effort put forth to get rg3 should be a parralell effort to pry luck away from the colts.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275671https://brownsboard.com/post/275671Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:31:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:49:22 GMT]]>

@king-ghoolie-lives said:

Yes, Joe Thomas has been instrumental in the Browns offense being so potent. Our ability to run teh football around the left side is fantastic.

Thomas is a great LT..... which means he adds little, if any impact to the team. He has not helped the Browns win at all. We suck just as much with him as we did without him. The Harrison hit on Clit McCunt was a result of Fat Ass Thomas missing a block on his side.

Plus, isn't this going to be his 8th yeah? He doesn't have many years left, and will probably miss a good part of this season with an injury. Seriously, he's due.

Trade him now, next year he won't be worth shit.

You're entitled to your opinion. But, in the play you're referring to, James Harrison was in coverage, not being blocked by the left tackle.

-jj

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275593https://brownsboard.com/post/275593Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:49:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:25:43 GMT]]>Trade him.😁

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275584https://brownsboard.com/post/275584Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:25:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:31:12 GMT]]>yes in a heartbeat

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275447https://brownsboard.com/post/275447Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:31:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:35:34 GMT]]>No

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275252https://brownsboard.com/post/275252Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:35:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:16:54 GMT]]>

@cuwoohio said:

A left tackle is one piece we have in this puzzle. I think we'll keep that the way it is

For the guys claiming this is stupid, would you trade Thomas for Cam Newton?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275245https://brownsboard.com/post/275245Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:16:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:20:03 GMT]]>A left tackle is one piece we have in this puzzle. I think we'll keep that the way it is

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275238https://brownsboard.com/post/275238Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:20:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:15:42 GMT]]>"sigh"

stupid. really stupid.

really, really, really, really, really stupid question. "sigh"

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275228https://brownsboard.com/post/275228Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:15:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:35:02 GMT]]>lol i know its a stupid question like i said i seen it on another board and just wanted to see what you guys would say

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275210https://brownsboard.com/post/275210Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:35:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sat, 03 Mar 2012 23:14:42 GMT]]>lmao @ this question.

No. A million times over. Maybe if Joe Thomas were 34.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275191https://brownsboard.com/post/275191Sat, 03 Mar 2012 23:14:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:21:31 GMT]]>I chose "Not a chance" only bacause "NO FUCKING WAY" was not an option...

+1 on Z's analogy...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275155https://brownsboard.com/post/275155Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:21:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:20:02 GMT]]>stupid question.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275150https://brownsboard.com/post/275150Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:20:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:10:41 GMT]]>You don't trade away good players.

That would be moronic.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275144https://brownsboard.com/post/275144Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:10:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:51:51 GMT]]>It is a nice analogy. But you have a better chance of killing your opponent with a sword than with your armor.

I still wouldn't trade Thomas tho.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275143https://brownsboard.com/post/275143Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:51:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:41:57 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

OOH, I like that analogy!

I agree...it's PERFECT!

Mike

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275084https://brownsboard.com/post/275084Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:41:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:18:38 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

Do you know how hard it is to get a franchise left tackle? Just about as hard as it is to get a franchise Qb.

Trading Thomas to get Griffin is like trading in your armour to get a sword. That swords gonna look real nice in your hands after you've been gutted because you had no protection.

Zombo

OOH, I like that analogy!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275061https://brownsboard.com/post/275061Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:18:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:26:57 GMT]]>Is Matt Kahili included in the trade??? But seriously no hes the top player at his position in the NFL and that position is a high demand...Many teams would dream of having Joe Thomas we should all be thankful as Browns fans that we do...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275038https://brownsboard.com/post/275038Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:26:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Joe Thomas For #2 on Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:57:21 GMT]]>The 2 teams who reached the SB this past year focused their money and draft picks on OL, DL, and a franchise QB.

You don't trade Joe Thomas - ever. You pay the man, and surround him with other top draft picks.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/275029https://brownsboard.com/post/275029Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:57:21 GMT