<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Any extenuating circumstances involved for picking #2 on any of the questions, let us know.<img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f644.png?v=7066fa4b48b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--face_with_rolling_eyes" title=":face_with_rolling_eyes:" alt="🙄" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/21904/more-thoughts-i-think-i-just-thought-in-question-form</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:54:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/21904.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:36:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:53:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoorta" aria-label="Profile: hoorta">@<bdi>hoorta</bdi></a> <a href="/post/275273">said</a>:</p>
<p>Your chess analogy is off Cal. Can't say I'm great at it, but a fairer analogy would be would you trade a bishop, rook, knight, and a couple of pawns for a queen. We're not talking about giving up every player.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>True, but using the chess analogy, the queen is only worth 9 points. A bishop, rook, knight, and 2 pawns is worth 13 points - certainly not worth the trade unless it gives you a superior position that will win you the game..</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275404</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275404</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bringbackbrownie2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:53:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:40:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mr.-t" aria-label="Profile: mr.-t">@<bdi>mr.-t</bdi></a> <a href="/post/275331">said</a>:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.newpokerking.com/images/poker-hand-rankings.jpg" alt="poker-hand-rankings.jpg" /></p>

<p>What will it take for us to get a royal flush?</p>

</blockquote>

<p><span style="color:#8B0000">I always wondered why a flush is considered to beat a straight. I think it should be the other way around. I think a straight is harder to achieve than a flush. Especially in a game like Texas Hold 'em.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275385</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275385</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:40:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Mon, 05 Mar 2012 03:53:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/canton-mike" aria-label="Profile: canton-mike">@<bdi>canton-mike</bdi></a> <a href="/post/275327">said</a>:</p>
<p>Hey, can we change this to poker hands so this non chess playin' ol' codger can understand too?  </p>
<p>Mike</p>

</blockquote>

<p><img src="http://www.newpokerking.com/images/poker-hand-rankings.jpg" alt="poker-hand-rankings.jpg" /></p>

<p>What will it take for us to get a royal flush?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275331</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275331</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 03:53:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Mon, 05 Mar 2012 03:21:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hey, can we change this to poker hands so this non chess playin' ol' codger can understand too?  </p>
<p>Mike</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275327</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275327</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 03:21:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:59:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Your chess analogy is off Cal. Can't say I'm great at it, but a fairer analogy would be would you trade a bishop, rook, knight, and a couple of pawns for a queen. We're not talking about giving up every player. Mr. Hoorta</p>
<p>***************************************</p>
<p>"sigh" ....</p>

<p>That's what  I get for being in a hurry before I left to go buy a combine. Agricultural, that is. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=7066fa4b48b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" title=":wink:" alt="😉" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275300</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275300</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:59:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:10:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, would you trade every player on your football team for RGIII?</p>

<p>Oh you wouldn't? Well that proves my point we shouldn't trade up for RGIII</p>



<p>sound logic...</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275274</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275274</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:10:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:02:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Your chess analogy is off Cal. Can't say I'm great at it, but a fairer analogy would be would you trade a bishop, rook, knight, and a couple of pawns for a queen. We're not talking about giving up every player.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275273</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275273</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:02:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:37:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Too bad RG3 is worth only a Bishop and not a Queen.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275241</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275241</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[USFBrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:37:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:55:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>at the start, you already have a queen.  guve me 2, and ill destroy ya.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275234</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275234</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[choco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:55:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More Thoughts I Think I Just Thought In Question Form on Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:42:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>don't screw up my point. I meant to START the game.</p>

<p>Dammit, Zombo. LOL </p>

<p>I fixed it.<img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f620.png?v=7066fa4b48b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--angry" title=":angry:" alt="😠" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/275232</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/275232</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:42:30 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>