@sadbrownsfan said:

Yeah first time I heard this was with Cheney and Bush, hence its Tony Blair(out of office in 2007) and not Gordon Brown, even Colin Powell who hasn't been part of the gov't since 2005.

I heard it in the presence of a OSU Michigan joke. Queen = Tressel, Obama = Carr and I think Henne = Biden and Hart = Powell

@mld-woody said:

Not only does the Queen NOT run England, or have any real power at all, but that is just a rehashing of a joke I have heard countless times before...

Yeah first time I heard this was with Cheney and Bush, hence its Tony Blair(out of office in 2007) and not Gordon Brown, even Colin Powell who hasn't been part of the gov't since 2005.

@the-cysko-kid said:

Are you handicapped? I didn't confirm or dispute anything he said...at all. And why should I ever use facts when you and your little henchman never do. You want a fact, jagoff? I'm not a liberal. I voted for john mccain and George bush before him. Would a liberal do that?

@the-cysko-kid said:

I feel like I would like you to fall into your thresher.

Cysko you need to go take your own inventory.

Everything that you have just stated about Cal claimed is false and misleading.

It appears you have taken the same tactics that most liberals use when they are losing the battle and start making personal insults.

I have not seen one piece of evidence that you yourself have brought to this thread in debate of facts.

@calfoxwc said:

But if you critically thought about it analytically, you would abhor that idea.

I wish you libs would quit proving me exactly correct in my appraisal of your behavior.

(including the personal attacks when you can't legtimately refute what the rest of us say about ObaMao...)

You're assuming I would personally attack you because of your feelings on barack Obama. I don't care about barack Obama one jot or tittle. I'm more likely to attack you personally because I think you're a dangerously insane 'person', and nobody should have to listen to your inane ramblings, especially when you articulate them like they're fact, and not paranoid buzzwords fed to you by rush limbaugh glen beck types.

@calfoxwc said:

But if you critically thought about it analytically, you would abhor that idea.

I wish you libs would quit proving me exactly correct in my appraisal of your behavior.

(including the personal attacks when you can't legtimately refute what the rest of us say about ObaMao...)

When I have proved you wrong by using facts, they just get ignored, and usually I get told facts are not relevant on this board. Also anytime a bill or law goes in front of the Supreme Court both sides try to argue its legitimacy/illegitimacy, then the Supreme Court decides. Its why there are 3 branches of Gov't that are designed to be checks and balances of each other.

I wish you libs would quit proving me exactly correct in my appraisal of your behavior.

(including the personal attacks when you can't legtimately refute what the rest of us say about ObaMao...)

But Obamao is far greater a menace to our country and way of life.

We're talking about our Constitution, and why it shouldn't be ignored and attempted to overrule it...

then turnabout the opposite tack.

See, woodpecker - it's exactly what I said.

Liberals/marxist/haters FEEL. They don't think. So, Obamao FEELS that he wants Obamaocare to not be declared UNCONSITUTIONAL because

Congress did it...

But then he FEELS like he wants the Supreme Court to rule against the Defense of Marriage Act, despite the fact that Congress approved it.

Opposite Feelings based on political expediency, and complete disregard for law, and principle.

That is dangerous, to be that corrupt and have the power they have right now.

With lib marxists, it's ALWAYS "both sides do it so it's okay"... IF THEIR GUY IS IN QUESTION.

But let it NOT be their guy, and all hell breaks loose with their outrage.

"Everybody does it, so it's okay to steal, etc etc etc" is a gutless cowards way of being. Sad and pitiful.

both sides do this

it politics