Zombo said:

Is it just me, or are these interactive mocks kinda gay?

Z

Not if they are handled correctly. This guy seems to be doing about as good a job as can be expected.

In a sense ALL mock drafts are 'gay" (in the connotation of being lame...not being homosexual)...as they are merely quite useless exercises in futility, but can occasionally be fun.

If Martin is still on the board, he's the pick at 22. Sanu is just as good if not better than Hill, he'll be the 37.

Zombo said:

Is it just me, or are these interactive mocks kinda gay?

Z

very gay. very wrong.

Z

@canton-mike said:

1) I submit that we are secure with NO position on offense. Our talent level was so deficient (still is on offense) that we have almost come to view mediocrity (or even less) as acceptable. My suggestion is that TE is not a deep position of strength in this draft, but Fleener is outstanding & I feel he would serve our offense well. Other positions can be filled a little later.

2) I view WR as a deep position in this draft with no A J Green at the top..A position we can fill after 1st round. I also believe we can go OL in the 2nd round, although I certainly wouldn't be upset with Martin at 22.

3) Our banter & speculation is fun. It's made more fun knowing that we finally have a REAL GM & trying to guess what he & his crew are thinking. Last draft, I didn't guess right on a damn ONE! LOL

Mike

Regarding TE- OK, we don't have a Gronkowski on our roster- but on sheer need, WR, RB, and RT rank way higher on what should be addressed.

My bet is it's going to be RB\WR or WR-RB (or RT) with the first two picks.

Interactive Mock Draft Results

Thank you guys for voting again!

@lawdawg said:

1) name me one position we are more secure with on offense. Left tackle doesn't count because it's one guy. and so the most secure position on offense is.... ????

2) who says we have to take a WR? Jonathan Martin

3) definitely appreciate new ideas. love the constructive banter. and I agree that Heckert & co. is in better position than all of us. cheers!

1) I submit that we are secure with NO position on offense. Our talent level was so deficient (still is on offense) that we have almost come to view mediocrity (or even less) as acceptable. My suggestion is that TE is not a deep position of strength in this draft, but Fleener is outstanding & I feel he would serve our offense well. Other positions can be filled a little later.

2) I view WR as a deep position in this draft with no A J Green at the top..A position we can fill after 1st round. I also believe we can go OL in the 2nd round, although I certainly wouldn't be upset with Martin at 22.

3) Our banter & speculation is fun. It's made more fun knowing that we finally have a REAL GM & trying to guess what he & his crew are thinking. Last draft, I didn't guess right on a damn ONE! LOL

Mike

If they really want Hill at 37, you bethca they keep it a secret that they are interested in him.

Smoke and Mirrors.

@canton-mike said:

1) We are hardly "secure" at TE. Ours are weak or about done & Fleener is outstanding.

2) How many really "proven" WRs are left at 22?

3) Just throwin' ideas out there. We could certainly do worse here.

It's only my opinion, just as your opinion is yours. I'll still defer to the real experts & that's Heckert & co.

Mike

1) name me one position we are more secure with on offense. Left tackle doesn't count because it's one guy. and so the most secure position on offense is.... ????

2) who says we have to take a WR? Jonathan Martin

3) definitely appreciate new ideas. love the constructive banter. and I agree that Heckert & co. is in better position than all of us. cheers!

@lawdawg said:

at 22 we draft the only position we're secure on? uh..............................................................................

1) We are hardly "secure" at TE. Ours are weak or about done & Fleener is outstanding.

2) How many really "proven" WRs are left at 22?

3) Just throwin' ideas out there. We could certainly do worse here.

It's only my opinion, just as your opinion is yours. I'll still defer to the real experts & that's Heckert & co.

Mike

@canton-mike said:

Sort of a surprise here...

Coby Fleener, Stanford TE.

Runs great routes, super hands, big target at 6'6" tall, & great in the red zone. Best of the tight ends & we can still get our O lineman & WR in rounds 2 & 3.

In addition, Watson has had multiple concussions, Smith is mostly a blocker, Moore doesn't block, Cameron has VERY limited experience but is a decent project.

Mike

at 22 we draft the only position we're secure on? uh..............................................................................

Coby Fleener, Stanford TE.

Runs great routes, super hands, big target at 6'6" tall, & great in the red zone. Best of the tight ends & we can still get our O lineman & WR in rounds 2 & 3.

In addition, Watson has had multiple concussions, Smith is mostly a blocker, Moore doesn't block, Cameron has VERY limited experience but is a decent project.

Mike

@dflo said:

Hey guys, it's time for your second pick in the interactive mock draft.

Browns are on the clock, a lot of good options still on the board.

You can cast your vote for who you want your team to pick here:

Interactive Mock Draft Results

And if you explain why with a brief short description, I will pick the best one and publish it along with the pick in the results section!

Jonathan Martin. Because he's way better than people are giving him credit for and we don't want to select a receiver that has caught less than 50 balls in 3 years.