and progressive is the neo socialist moniker.

But you know that. Do you work for Dennis Kucinich or something?

The list was put out BY the socialists.

@pumpkin-eater said:

get any more full of yourself and you'll end up choking.

Hopefully not in the next 7 days

@mld-woody said:

.... I just don't care right now. I've got so much more important shit to do. Just ask Vapor. We are getting into finals we. We are busy becoming tomorrow's leader's and intellectual pillars as doctors and engineers. If I want to make a long ass comment later I will.

get any more full of yourself and you'll end up choking.

But if it has to be someone, I prefer Romney. He's smart. He's capable. He's not mean-spirited. He takes his job seriously. If history is any guide, he'll appoint some good people to work with him. Like the first President Bush, I expect the plums thrown to the base to be mostly symbolic.

The problem with Romney is that you have no idea what guy you're going to get. You can only make an educated guess.

@heckofajobbrownie said:

I'm glad you nominated Romney. We get a moderate Democrat either way.

Romney will pay lip service to the Republican base, just like he just did for the last two years, but he's done with you now. It's back to being a moderate for the general.

And I'm sure you will defend him with every fiber of your being when axelrod and the gang paint him as Hitler light.

WSS

@calfoxwc said:

leftist, corrupt, lying dirtbag socialist/communist/fascist vs not so moderate Republican from a liberal state.

Most of real America will go for the latter.

Even you have to know that the obamao regime is really frantic.

what is real America?

what makes certain parts of America real and what makes the other parts "not real"?

Most of real America will go for the latter.

Even you have to know that the obamao regime is really frantic.

Romney will pay lip service to the Republican base, just like he just did for the last two years, but he's done with you now. It's back to being a moderate for the general.

@calfoxwc said:

Okie-dokie, Bob, I understand protest votes. I'll be protesting the corruption and socialist agenda by Obamao....voting for Romney, he isn't

my first, second or third pick either.

but if the election is decided by just a few votes,

and we go into a civil war to protect our Constitution and freedoms....

you won't be a happy camper.

True, but I cannot bring myself to vote for Romney.

Obama was elected for "change," and that's what I'm thinking may happen again. Unless something remarkable happens in the next 5-6 months, it's Romney's election to lose. People are understandably fed up with the status quo.

my first, second or third pick either.

but if the election is decided by just a few votes,

and we go into a civil war to protect our Constitution and freedoms....

you won't be a happy camper.

@bob806 said:

I'm voting for someone not on the "D" or "R" ticket, again. While many say that is stupid, I say it's my only chance to vote my distrust of the 2-party system.

Jimmy Hoffa?

WSS

@calfoxwc said:

I accept Romney far easier, than Obamao, with his communist mentors, favorite socialist professors, his communist father,

and his violent, and sick in the head radicals as his friends, and all over his stinkin corrupt regime.

I'm voting for someone not on the "D" or "R" ticket, again. While many say that is stupid, I say it's my only chance to vote my distrust of the 2-party system.

Values....he has basically shunned everything his father taught him, alienating unions

Greed...I won't say he is necessarily greedy, but he definitely took full advantage of capitalism at the expense of AMERICAN workers to get wealthy

Sloth...nope, I don't think he's a sloth

Losers/Moochers...yes, they exist, always have, doesn't mean it's correct

"Isn't fair"...taking full advantage of the rules, for personal/corporate gain at the expense of the American worker is total bullshit, IMHO

*****************

But Bob, you are changing the subject. Heck ridiculed West, when West was accurate more than you will admit.

The Socialists put out the list.

So what's his name ... Sanders? Is the only one who ADMITS it.

The rest have a huge reason to deny it. But the truth is, it's what they say, what they do,

that is explained perfectly, by them being socialists in an official way.

When did Obamao post his tax returns and birth certificate the first time around? Even his LAWYER admits,

that that certificate is not genuine. And, Romney doesn't need to - it will only be used as fodder if the left can use it that way,

for villifying him for not being black, and poor, and Muslim but "Christian" but neither....

Romney alienated unions? Then I'm on board with him in a huge way. Unions, all sorts of them... SUCK.

The SEIU is a "union". The AFL-CIO is a "union". Not American, though.

Romney didn't take advantage of nothin. He had a high profile job. Like, every single salaried manager

is taking "advantage" of every hourly? That's baloney.

I accept Romney far easier, than Obamao, with his communist mentors, favorite socialist professors, his communist father,

and his violent, and sick in the head radicals as his friends, and all over his stinkin corrupt regime.

Bunker said:

that is what i am saying, they have used the unions to gain power by adding more union jobs to strengthen their base. and since this has allready happened and these jobs will not be cut!!!!! who is paying these absorbement amounts of money that are guaranteed to these workers? we dont have enough money and cannot tax enough to cover all the perks and benefits that are guaranteed to these union gov. workers.

Bunker, come on now. You have some validity when you state there isn't enough money to cover all the perks & benefits. I don't have all the answers, but I do have years of contract negotiation experience. There have been plenty of concessions at the bargaining table from unionized workers in the last 5 years or so.

However, if you want to drink the Kool Aid from Kasich & company & blame 13% of the population for our economic ills, that's downright insane.

Bunker said:

well bob806 if the unions had the majority of the vote we wouldn't have to bother with elecetions then would we? its the whole socialist system that has been set up by our very own 2 party system that has created this conundrum and i dont see us shrinking the government payroll anytime soon. so it looks like we will be greeks soon enough.

Shrink the government payroll? Sure. I'm sure Obama and your man, mitt romney would be willing to take a paycut and live like the common rabble they pretend to care about.

@calfoxwc said:

Yes, folks. It's what the libs do. They lie, they'll do anything, be negative about everything...

well, and at the cost of the rest of us who DO believe in principles, values, and America.

And our freedom, and our military. And our families. and our Constitution.

The rest? Losers. Moochers. They just justify dragging the system down with their greed and sloth....

by saying that not having others' riches... "isn't fair".

Read carefully what you wrote there, and then close your eyes and think of the (apparent) Republican nominee, Mitt Romney.

Principles..."I don't need to disclose my ENTIRE tax returns, I play by my own rules here"

Values....he has basically shunned everything his father taught him, alienating unions

Greed...I won't say he is necessarily greedy, but he definitely took full advantage of capitalism at the expense of AMERICAN workers to get wealthy

Sloth...nope, I don't think he's a sloth

Losers/Moochers...yes, they exist, always have, doesn't mean it's correct

"Isn't fair"...taking full advantage of the rules, for personal/corporate gain at the expense of the American worker is total bullshit, IMHO

We will be worse off if Romney is elected. Obama does suck, I agree, but Romney & the neo-Rs, the Tea Party, will ultimately ruin the average US citizen.

@the-cysko-kid said:

You should summon Joe mccarthy from hell and the two of you can clean house of these pinko liberal Scum.

Of course as zealous as joe may have been during the cold war the communists actually were as close to an enemy as we had.

We tend to confuse the ideal of communism and the dictatorship the russian government became.

I suppose if you boiled down the direction al qaeda wants the middle east to go you could find plenty of u s citizens who agree.

Would anyone here be comfortable with al qaeda sympathizers in congress?

And do u s citizens have a right to believe in that?

WSS

Bunker said:

i dont think they would admit to it? its not popular to come out of the closet in the free world.

Commies are tricky that way.

Cal, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, Cal, children's ice cream.

There is one admitted socialist in Congress, and it's Bernie Sanders from Vermont, who is an Independent, not a Democrat. You can freak out about him all you like.

Secondly, West called members of the Progressive Caucus "Communists" not "socialists" so your point isn't valid even if it were true, which it isn't.

@calfoxwc said:

Come on, Woody. muster up some nerve and comment on the thread. I showed you the list, put out by the socialist org itself.

Any intelligent comment?

I don't even remember what this is in reference too. I know there was a Rep guy that said a bunch of Dems are socialists or something and Heck thought that was ridiculous and now you are posting info to call Heck out.

I'd have to look back at the original thing and then actually check through your info making sure its accurate...

.... I just don't care right now. I've got so much more important shit to do. Just ask Vapor. We are getting into finals we. We are busy becoming tomorrow's leader's and intellectual pillars as doctors and engineers. If I want to make a long ass comment later I will.