Busted!!!!

You don't like my answer, have a pity party.

I wouldn't have answered kid's questions graphically. Not in the fifth grade.

I would refer them to their parents. PARENTS.

And you just ask stupid questions because that's the only input you can muster,.

And you MISUSE common words because you don't know better.

You don't comprehend what you read much, at least online.

pizz about all you want - but that principal should be fired, and prosecuted for

indecent interaction with a minor. And no, the parents NEVER gave permission for THAT garbage.

and I still see you refuse to answer my question

this goes up there with thinking that was a real neurosurgeon

It's you completely misusing words.

You've done it before.

A typo is a mistyping.

You are just a huge mistake. You got nothin but Heck's back pockets to hang onto.

And you really, really are his Little Johnnie Woodpecker.

And no, you didn't answer. I asked how you would respond and you said "Well I'd never have the class to begin with"

that's not an answer

if anything Cal you are a great life lesson in how people can look at the same thing, and see two completely different things depending on where they are standing. The fact that you can post what you so and then turn around and attack the intelligence of other people's posts is remarkable.

*********************************

You are using the wrong word again, dimwit Little Johnnie Woodpecker.

THERE you go again.

THEIR problem is that they aren't smart enough to use English properly.

Think about it. I did answer your stupid question. all you have is badgering people with dumbass one liners?

You really are worthless to discussions on this board. My guess is, you have never been funny or informative a day in your life.

I mean, minute. Minute in your life.

Oops; my bad. You never think. FEEL about why you are so alleged smart and allegedly in college in engineering,

...and you use "your" for "you're".... and you use "there's" when you should use "their's".

There's more. Stupid just seems to be written all over every one of your posts.

Fuck I said I would stop.

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=iAAqGaNCFAY

So, by you libs and your personal attacks, that means you support the perverted behavior in the subject of this thread?

Libs?

Yes, or NO ?

It isn't about two nuns nothin.

It's about what I posted.

Libs support it? Or not? Oh, and the article CLEARLY STATES THAT PARENTS WERE OUTRAGED so stop

lying out your wazoos. The complaint is that the "principal" went way, far beyond the alleged scope of the course.

@mr.-t said:

The facts have not changed just because liberals want to teech kids filth. 11 and 12 year olds are not mature enough to understand the concepts of sex.

What is the purpose of these teachings?

We do have laws to protect children from sex offenders but when some fag comes along with a major in sex education we allow dumb people free reign over classroom curriculum designed to promote homosexuality.

12 year olds dude.

Look. Kids are really learning sex ed from the internet. So either you talk to your kids about sex, you consent to a teacher doing it, or they're going to learn about sex from bang bros. Ok for you if you want to teach your kids to choke some girl, spit in her face and make her eat vomit, but in reality someone, preferably the parent, has to teach kids about sex. If you don't, they're going to find out the worst aspects of it anyway. It's only a click away. It's not 1975 anymore.

emote

nothing has changed since flapper girls

emote

@mr.-t said:

That took you a whole ten seconds to reply.

12 year olds dude.

I was taught by Catholic nuns at 12 years old. I was told that I will probably get an STD if I have premarital sex. I was told that if we both waited to have sex til married, we wouldn't get an STD. Those are scare tactics, and they reek of ignorance. Two virgins CAN give each other STD's.

12 year olds dude.

@mr.-t said:

The facts have not changed just because liberals want to teech kids filth. 11 and 12 year olds are not mature enough to understand the concepts of sex.

What is the purpose of these teachings?

We do have laws to protect children from sex offenders but when some fag comes along with a major in sex education we allow dumb people free reign over classroom curriculum designed to promote homosexuality.

12 year olds dude.

So who truly understands the concepts of sex? I was taught by Catholic nuns.

@vaportrail said:

It's funny/sad how this fact escapes them. Everyone is FEELING but them. They believe that they have a monopoly on the truth.

The facts have not changed just because liberals want to teech kids filth. 11 and 12 year olds are not mature enough to understand the concepts of sex.

What is the purpose of these teachings?

We do have laws to protect children from sex offenders but when some fag comes along with a major in sex education we allow dumb people free reign over classroom curriculum designed to promote homosexuality.

12 year olds dude.

To prove it further - I'll even give you this link:

tl;dr

All that is wrong in the world can be blamed on libs.

I neve said anything about principles always being black and white. A principle is a guideline to adhere to for honorable reasons.

What you are actually talking about, is conflicting priinciples.

Not stealing vs feeding your family during a depression, perhaps, and you can take some apples from a nearby orchard on night, nobody knows, nobody gets hurt, they won't miss apples.

Or, snaring a squirrel in a farmer's woods..

That is balancing act. Defies the principle of honesty. But, it's a guideline for honorable, constructive living.

Getting defiant because the fix you are in, and getting angry and shooting somebody to take their money so you can buy food?

That's a self destructive emotionalist lib response. So, I have Einstein and you guys have emotionalist rationalizations.

I win.

To prove it further - I'll even give you this link:

Yes, blah blah blah I emote you think. Yadda Yadda Yadda Obama is scary and black. Ring-a-ding-a-ding dong you're a farmer. Hoopty damn doo doo. There I saved you the trouble of responding. Don't flatter yourself by assuming anything you might say from this point on is any more meaningful than that. You think you "kick peoples asses" on the internet when in reality you're just an annoying talking head that is easily ignored and often disregarded with a shrug, one raised eyebrow and then a complete lack of interest. Go ahead and say your ridiculous piece, then return to your basket weaving on the funny farm.

@calfoxwc said:

welcome to another emotional outburst episode of "whaaaa ! I'm mad so I'm going to attack Cal because I don't have a clue"

Einstein. I got Einstein, Vapor. You have Little Johnnie woodpecker and Cysko.

You're right. You're so, incredibly right.

Einstein. I got Einstein, Vapor. You have Little Johnnie woodpecker and Cysko.

*****************

gotcha. LOL

It's funny/sad how you emotionally jumped onto the wagon that just went over the cliff.