<![CDATA[2 teams said to be interested in DA]]>(this is a little old, but I didn't see it posted elsewhere)

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/afcnorth/0-1-50...-step-drop.html

With free agency less than two months away, the Derek Anderson sweepstakes could catch steam. I was told last week that at least two teams -- one from each conference -- began doing "homework" on the Cleveland Browns' backup quarterback. I'm not ready to divulge the teams just yet because it's still preliminary and I'm waiting for more details. But with a new head coach on board in Eric Mangini, it's difficult to tell whether Anderson will still be available via trade.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/2359/2-teams-said-to-be-interested-in-daRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 16:30:43 GMTThu, 15 Jan 2009 01:13:13 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:32:37 GMT]]>

Squeeling Suck said:

I molest diseased rodents.

Regards

.... an'at

.

That explains a lot.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/33014https://brownsboard.com/post/33014Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:32:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:02:23 GMT]]>

@pumpkin-eater said:

Squeeling Suck could post the cure for Cancer and the winning POwerball lottery numbers and I still would not give a rat's ass about his postings.

You sure make a lot of posts about your not caring what I have to say.

Oh, the irony.

I believe there's an ignore feature here, you may do well to use it.

Regards

.... an'at

.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/33002https://brownsboard.com/post/33002Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:02:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:44:05 GMT]]>Why do squeelers even post on Browns boards . I guess it's because the squeeler boards probably run the idiots off when they find out their limited knowledge , and general ignorance in general .

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32997https://brownsboard.com/post/32997Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:44:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:38:47 GMT]]>

@danamal said:

There will ALWAYS be a coach or team who will overpay for DA because they think they have the answer to correct his flaws and make him a good QB,you see it all the time with players who shouldnt be in the league for whatever reason but someone always thinks they can solve the problem.

DA to the highest bidder,he will not be here much longer.

*see Jeff George*

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32996https://brownsboard.com/post/32996Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:38:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:38:13 GMT]]>Squeeling Suck could post the cure for Cancer and the winning POwerball lottery numbers and I still would not give a rat's ass about his postings.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32994https://brownsboard.com/post/32994Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:38:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:32:43 GMT]]>

@earle said:

Maybe someone will relieve our headache and take the poor schmuk off our hands

Yeah, and then Lum can go be a fan on someone else's board.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32993https://brownsboard.com/post/32993Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:32:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:27:24 GMT]]>SChuck, for all of his trailer-park yinzering, is, for the most part, on target with his barbs.

Mind you, it isn't because he's intelligent, 'cause he's clearly not. It's just that with the Browns as down as they've been and the Steelers as successful as they've been, a child could come in here, say "scoreboard," and work down from there.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32990https://brownsboard.com/post/32990Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:27:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:36:33 GMT]]>No one cares what you think Steeler suck.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32973https://brownsboard.com/post/32973Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:36:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:01:09 GMT]]>The time to trade DA was before this past season started when he had value. Signing him to a fairly big contract coupled with a lousy season isn't going to have teams tripping over each other for him.

A 5th round pick would be like hitting the lottery.

Regards

.... an'at

.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32821https://brownsboard.com/post/32821Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:01:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:47:06 GMT]]>Before Mangini came I never thought they'd trade him. An experienced, decent backup is hard to find. Hell, a decent starter is hard to find. But with Mangini's history of draft day trades I think he'll let DA go for the right draft pick.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32813https://brownsboard.com/post/32813Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:47:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 2 teams said to be interested in DA on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:34 GMT]]>Maybe someone will relieve our headache and take the poor schmuk off our hands

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/32807https://brownsboard.com/post/32807Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:25:34 GMT