@westside-steve said:

Woody I will be long gone by then but trust me amigo, even though you may not wind up a balls out lunatic, you will most certainly find a great deal of the younger generation to be a pain in your ass.

WSS

I find a lot of the people in my generation to be a pain in the ass

@mld-woody said:

You are like 60 years old T, how are you at the same maturity level as a 12 year old?

God damn, I hope when I am your age, or Bunkers, or Cal's I have something better to do than argue and insult others on an online message board and then be so addicted to it that I need to make additional fake accounts so I can continue to insult and argue

Woody I will be long gone by then but trust me amigo, even though you may not wind up a balls out lunatic, you will most certainly find a great deal of the younger generation to be a pain in your ass.

WSS

No they don't

I wish I knew something about life, to be able to have a real thought about any subject, instead

of just emoting about issues in bizaare fashion, lauching personal attacks, and making myself look exactly like

mz the pussy the pussy.

@ru4scuba said:

They have had those all along, well before they demanded the "right" to PERVERT the sanctity of marriage you infantile gay-marrying twit. Aren't you late for your Flag Burners Anonymous meeting?

You are like 60 years old T, how are you at the same maturity level as a 12 year old?

God damn, I hope when I am your age, or Bunkers, or Cal's I have something better to do than argue and insult others on an online message board and then be so addicted to it that I need to make additional fake accounts so I can continue to insult and argue

MLD%20Woody said:

Lol, you think allowing gays to marry = them having tyranny over you?

It doesn't matter how small of a % a group is, they deserve the same rights as anyone else.

They have had those all along, well before they demanded the "right" to PERVERT the sanctity of marriage you infantile gay-marrying twit. Aren't you late for your Flag Burners Anonymous meeting?

READ. LEARN to THINK.

it's a pattern of leftists' attacks on American society, with gay

demand for "marriage", because they want their "rights"...

when all along, civil unions give them those ritghts.

So why the marriage perversion?

Because. It's a perverted minority thinking- to establish a control over society.

That's tyranny. And, please stop acting like you have the mind of a slug.

You are a flea on this board, and nobody on this board wants to claim you

as their flea. Every groundhog out in our fields will be more intelligent than you.

It doesn't matter how small of a % a group is, they deserve the same rights as anyone else.

@calfoxwc said:

Little Johnny Stupidass Woodenpeckerhead has another worhtless comment.

that is stupid - man/woman marriage has nothing to do with race.

gays are 1-3 percent. That makes them an anomaly, pretty much

not normal - and not deserving of the right to establish tyranny over

the gigantic minority. Answer up - if civil unions give those gays those rights...

then why the hell are they pursuing to force all of America to redefine marriage?

What is there to be gained?

Nothing, stupidass. It's an attack on what is established. you gays playing the victim.

So, Little Johnnie Dumbassheet Woodenpeckerhead, you lose.

The difference is principal. Equal rights for Americans and not being second class citizens. If you don't see that, especially since the 'Christian' definition of marriage holds no legal weight, you're just a bigot. Everyone here already knows you're a bigot so don't sweat it.

that is stupid - man/woman marriage has nothing to do with race.

gays are 1-3 percent. That makes them an anomaly, pretty much

not normal - and not deserving of the right to establish tyranny over

the gigantic minority. Answer up - if civil unions give those gays those rights...

then why the hell are they pursuing to force all of America to redefine marriage?

What is there to be gained?

Nothing, stupidass. It's an attack on what is established. you gays playing the victim.

So, Little Johnnie Dumbassheet Woodenpeckerhead, you lose.

If you want a contract, WHY THE HELL ISN't A CIVIL UNION SUFFICIENT?

You know why. The civil union gives them the exact rights.

So? Why a phoney "marriage" that would do the same thing?

I'll tell you why. Because "civil union" doesn't undermine and slap

the institution of MARRIAGE in the face. That's why.

Deal with it. You are wrong on this issue. There are plenty of Americans

who are tired of the left slapping them in the face. Bank on it.

The rest of America, with NORMAL principles and values, do not want

those principles and values trashed just because you gay people

want to attack everybody else who isn't gay.

Civil unions solve that problem. But liberals don't really want the problem solved.

They always demand to be VICTIMS. And they demand to be able to screw up

the status quo institutions that make this country a great country. And legitimate MARRIAGE is one of those.

Truth is, you lose. Civil unions give the gay community their rights.

Plain and simple, you are full of crap.

@calfoxwc said:

Apparently, we're back to dems supporting beastiality.

Anything to undermine our way of life, our country, our morals.

All in all, that occurs in nature, in russian prisons, blah blah.

But not one of those engaging in same sex activity, small, even tiny minority....

ever have to get married.

Never have to. Not ever.

"ka-ching"

You say "our country" meaning what? Who exactly would you be speaking for? There's quite a few people who would disagree with your views and guess what? It's "their country" too.

Are you saying "ka ching" as if you've made some big point? You have not. The truth is gays have the same rights as Americans as straight people. Marriage is a legal contract, you need to be liscensed, for some stupid reason. There's a seperation if church and law in "our country" so any logic not involving bigotry would conclude that gays have every right to become married.

It makes you uncomfortable, because you're a bigot, so you find some blustery reason that involves your morals. Christian values don't make law here. Stop EMOTING and think with your head.

Anything to undermine our way of life, our country, our morals.

All in all, that occurs in nature, in russian prisons, blah blah.

But not one of those engaging in same sex activity, small, even tiny minority....

ever have to get married.

Never have to. Not ever.

"ka-ching"

I mean, I knew about the penguins, but gay emus? Gay octopus? Gay brown bears?

What is this world coming to, Cysko? Everyone is catching the gay.

@the-cysko-kid said:

PM

'Perverted' penguins shocked biologist so much he hid results http://www.latimes.c...1,0,32225.story

Sounds like something that a lib would get into!!!!

We need to check voters id's so libs don't sign these penguins up to vote

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The above is a post from saint. It's funny because the penguins, in their natural habitat untouched by any liberals are practicing homosexual behaviour.

That one

@ballpeen said:

Are animals other than humans queer?

Sure. Penguins. See the link

@browns149 said:

Slavery was one of societies rules for hundredes of years. Turns out that changed. Things change. That's what the world does. CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are animals other than humans queer?

When a scientist’s interpretation of data does not match the clear meaning of the text in the Bible, we should never reinterpret the Bible. God knows just what He meant to say, and His understanding of science is infallible, whereas ours is fallible. So we should never think it necessary to modify His Word. Genesis 1 defines the days of creation to be literal days (a number with the word “day” always means a normal day in the Old Testament, and the phrase “evening and morning” further defines the days as literal days). Since the Bible is the inspired Word of God, we should examine the validity of the standard interpretation of 14C dating by asking several questions

Well I'm sold.

EVERYONE STOP THE SCIENCE! God already told us everything in his bestseller.

The secular (evolutionary) worldview interprets the universe and world to be billions of years old. The Bible teaches a young universe and earth. Which worldview does science support?

Lol. Because the evil secular (evolutionary) world doesn't already base their beliefs on what science supports. Evolution had nothing to do with science apparently. Just that evil Darwin and his Satanic rituals.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_trees

I don't know about carbon dating....

Doesn't Carbon-14 Dating Disprove the Bible? - Answers in Genesis Sep 20, 2007 ... Note that, contrary to a popular misconception, carbon dating is not .... on that assumption might be correct but still give a wrong conclusion. www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible Carbon Dating: Why you cant trust it or other radiometric dating ... reasons why you cant trust carbon dating creationist creationism evolution dinosaurs. ... This is just one of many inaccurate dates given by Carbon dating. www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/carbondating.html Carbon clock could show the wrong time - physicsworld.com Carbon clock could show the wrong time. May 10, 2001. Carbon dating is a mainstay of geology and archaeology - but an enormous peak discovered in the ... physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2676 How accurate are Carbon-14 and other radioactive dating methods ... Discussion on the inaccuracies found using the Carbon-14 dating method, and the various other radioactive dating methods. Plus evidence for a much younger ... www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c007.html Carbon Dating, please tell me how it is wrong?, page 1 Unfortunately carbon dating is attacked as being inaccurate. I think most of this stems from contaminated samples. For example if one were ... www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread292318/pg1 ERRORS ARE FEARED IN CARBON DATING - New York Times May 31, 1990 ... But it is already clear that the carbon method of dating will have to be ... age based on carbon analyses were wrong by as much as 3,500 years. www.nytimes.com/1990/05/31/us/errors-are-feared-in-carbon-dating.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm www.nytimes.com/1990/05/31/us/errors-are-feared-in-carbon-dating.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm Christians, why is radiocarbon dating so inaccurate? - Yahoo! Answers Traditional 14C testing assumes equilibrium in the rate of formation and the rate of decay. In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay ... answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120217153021AADDsiA answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120217153021AADDsiA Is Carbon Dating Accurate? Is Carbon Dating Accurate? - What is the level of accuracy of this dating method? Why are there discrepancies in results when using this method? www.allaboutarchaeology.org/is-carbon-dating-accurate-faq.htm www.allaboutarchaeology.org/is-carbon-dating-accurate-faq.htm The Biggest Radiocarbon Dating Mistake Ever It may well go down as the biggest radiocarbon dating mistake in history; not because there is anything wrong with the measurement process (there may not ... www.innoval.com/C14/

@calfoxwc said:

I don't know, woodpecker, ... I wasn't around back then to know for sure..... I have to go cut firewood. No, I'll just do the hay, then I'll get the brush and sight in my scope.

Well they can carbon date certain trees to much older than that, so there you go.