<![CDATA[Do We Still Need Receiver Help?]]>i know he played for mich st. i know he played for the steelers. yes he's a little old. but the guy can catch the ball.

why not sign plaxico burress to a one/two year contract? he's gotta be going cheap. and all the 'off the field' problems have seen to disappeared after shooting himself in the leg and doing a stint in jail.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/24011/do-we-still-need-receiver-helpRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 22:07:59 GMTFri, 14 Sep 2012 14:25:36 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Do We Still Need Receiver Help? on Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:10:24 GMT]]>We would have to pay him veteran salary and he just doesn't have enough left in the tank to justify signing him in my opinion. We do still need help at WR though..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/303255https://brownsboard.com/post/303255Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:10:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Do We Still Need Receiver Help? on Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:00:24 GMT]]>

@wrrebel said:

no.. he is slow now and the same type of receiver as josh gordan or greg little..

yeah i know he's slow but as he said today on 'first take' you can always neutralize speed but you can't neutralize size. and you can't compare him to little because burress catches the ball.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/303252https://brownsboard.com/post/303252Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:00:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Do We Still Need Receiver Help? on Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:25:58 GMT]]>no.. he is slow now and the same type of receiver as josh gordan or greg little..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/303239https://brownsboard.com/post/303239Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:25:58 GMT