<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Unbelievable Statistic]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I was listening to the radio this morning on Mike and Mike and they related this fact:</p>

<p>The Kansas City Chiefs have not had a quarterback whom they themselves drafted start and win a single game for them since 1987 when Todd Blackledge QBd to a victory.  That is well over 400 games ago.  Amazing.  Essentially then every QB that has been a starter for them has been a pickup from another team for the last 25 years.</p>


<p>I will tell you right now also that the HC/OC/QB combo of the Chiefs is probably as bad as there is.  Matt Cassell had one single decent throw from what I saw. (the one to put them in FG territory that allowed them to tie the game). Otherwise he was awful. With any competency whatsoever the Chiefs should have won that game....though their defense did appear to be tough.  Romeo should never have been chosen the HC of that team.  I think they made a mistake to let go of Haley.</p>

<p>As it is, the Chiefs MUST get a new HC/OC, and draft the best QB available next year, because right now they are operating with dog shit.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/24669/unbelievable-statistic</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 23:20:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/24669.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:11:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbelievable Statistic on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:45:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevelandbigdawg" aria-label="Profile: clevelandbigdawg">@<bdi>clevelandbigdawg</bdi></a> <a href="/post/312929">said</a>:</p>
<p>Let's not put the carriage before the horse. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=75b6de7bacf" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /></p>

</blockquote>

<p><strong>I think he means the Chiefs are getting a new QB.  They need to.  Only question is: who? </strong></p>
<p><strong>I don't mean to make this a Chiefs thread...but I am always interested in seeing a downtrodden team get better.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Figure this out: the Chiefs, though in two of the first 2 Super Bowls have not been there since 1969.  (same for the Jets).  I mean really, does it matter if a team made a "Super Bowl" 43 years ago vs. winning a title 48 years ago?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Prediction:  The Browns will be in a Super Bowl before either the Chiefs or Jets get to another one.</strong></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/312934</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/312934</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:45:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbelievable Statistic on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:22:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kosar_for_president" aria-label="Profile: kosar_for_president">@<bdi>kosar_for_president</bdi></a> <a href="/post/312907">said</a>:</p>
<p>Well they are going to get one next year.   Woo!</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Let's not put the carriage before the horse. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=75b6de7bacf" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/312929</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/312929</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ClevelandBigDawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:22:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbelievable Statistic on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:24:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Well they are going to get one next year.   Woo!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/312907</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/312907</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kosar_For_President]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:24:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbelievable Statistic on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:06:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>That is just simply not a commitment to developing players.  Successful teams develop their quarterbacks and stick them into a situation with continuity...  </p>

<p>We should be happy that, since they returned, the Browns have drafted a decent QB <em>prospect</em> three times in the first round and twice in third round.  The development could have possibly been there with Couch, Frye, Quinn, or McCoy if they just committed to a coaching staff and similar scheme for a minimum of five years....</p>

<p>Right now the team is young and if the Haslam, Banner, and the rest of the staff believe in Weeden then they need to stick with him for years and develop him.  If they even have the slightest concern with him they need to get their guy that they will commit 100% to.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/312904</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/312904</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mdmusch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:06:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbelievable Statistic on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:06:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/312891">said</a>:</p>
<p>I was listening to the radio this morning on Mike and Mike and they related this fact:</p>

<p>The Kansas City Chiefs have not had a quarterback whom they themselves drafted start and win a single game for them since 1987 when Todd Blackledge QBd to a victory.  That is well over 400 games ago.  Amazing.  Essentially then every QB that has been a starter for them has been a pickup from another team for the last 25 years.</p>


<p>I will tell you right now also that the HC/OC/QB combo of the Chiefs is probably as bad as there is.  Matt Cassell had one single decent throw from what I saw. (the one to put them in FG territory that allowed them to tie the game). Otherwise he was awful. With any competency whatsoever the Chiefs should have won that game....though their defense did appear to be tough.  Romeo should never have been chosen the HC of that team.  I think they made a mistake to let go of Haley.</p>

<p>As it is, the Chiefs MUST get a new HC/OC, and draft the best QB available next year, because right now they are operating with dog shit.</p>

</blockquote>


<p>Shocking really.. You would have though the HOF Brody Croyle would have won a game by accident..</p>


<p>Funny thing is Cheifs were a young an upcoming team the year Haley took them to the play offs. The following year they were devasted with injuries. The biggest mistake was firing Haley in mid season.. They have said that players play harder under interim coached because of the fear if a new coach comes in they may not be in their plans. </p>

<p>Scott Pioli is poop..</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/312903</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/312903</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[WRREBEL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:06:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbelievable Statistic on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:01:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I want to feel better about how the Browns play, I watch a Chiefs game.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/312900</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/312900</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kosarfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:01:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>