@xsvwill said:

Pointless post, you dont know if he would have or not. Also key word was "if" it wasnt going to happen. Browns got destroyed. Last time i checked, not a single on of the browns fans came back and said anything after the loss, so whos fans are "wak, spineless specimans"?

Not pointless at all. If the Browns had won, your pussy newbie ass wouldn't have even signed on here. So you are even more gutless than your compadre.

As for not a single Browns fan "coming back and saying anything after the loss" I have no clue what you are talking about.

Are you talking about coming on to a Redskins message board? I wouldn't know anything about that. I don't troll other boards....so I don't know...and care less.

I only care about who or what comes on this board....and when feckless fucks like you come on here, you get what you deserve.

@the-gipper said:

And if the Browns had won you wouldn't be back. You would have been Vagitron's kid brother. Actually, no, not true. Vagitron had the guts to come back when the Browns beat the Steelers.

You are just a weak, spineless speciman.

Pointless post, you dont know if he would have or not. Also key word was "if" it wasnt going to happen. Browns got destroyed. Last time i checked, not a single on of the browns fans came back and said anything after the loss, so whos fans are "wak, spineless specimans"?

@rg34l said:

Yo, I'm back. Even the refs gave you sympathy calls. The worst part is that when the Skins went into their victory formation they were inside the 10 ready to score again. Enjoy the Egg in your face.

And if the Browns had won you wouldn't be back. You would have been Vagitron's kid brother. Actually, no, not true. Vagitron had the guts to come back when the Browns beat the Steelers.

You are just a weak, spineless speciman.

@king-ghoolie-lives said:

Weeden was a smarter pick than Luck and RG 3. Just sit back and warch.

I sat back, watched and laughed my ass off at the Browns and you.

@skinsfan28 said:

Griffins not playing at all. If cousins starts playing bad. Grossman will come in and then it will be even worse

Yup, just saw RG III is listed as inactive today.

@hoorta said:

RGIII will not start.... That doesn't mean he won't play. We all remember Weeden's first game as a starter- 12\35, 118 yards, 0 TDs, 4 ints.

Supposedly,Griffin's not even suited up.

@king-ghoolie-lives said:

Jim Browns didn't miss games for silly things like a twisted ankle.

Twisted ankle? Really?

Come on man. You're better than that.

@skinsfan28 said:

No excuses regardless of win or lose.

You speak funny. We are used to Steeler fans. I'm not sure I follow.

Zombo

@skinsfan28 said:

Well griffins not playing tomorrow. Unlike my fellow fans I don't have much faith in Cousins in his first nfl start. I feel it's possible he can do it but don't want to get my hopes up. Regardless good game and good luck tomorrow. No excuses regardless of win or lose. This is shanahans call of he thinks cousins can do it then I have to believe he is an nfl caliber qb.

RGIII will not start.... That doesn't mean he won't play. We all remember Weeden's first game as a starter- 12\35, 118 yards, 0 TDs, 4 ints.

Well, your over-confident friend now has a built in excuse if you lose. BTW, weather isn't supposed to be too bad- upper 40s chance of occasional showers.

who woulda thought?

@king-ghoolie-lives said:

I have NEVER, EVER changed my story.

In what possible way does my saying we should have goe after RG3 contradict what I am saying now? It doesn't. you fucking morons.

I stand by BOTH statements and BOTH statements are true. I am STILL the most accurate poster on this board AND completely accurate on RG3......................

During the draft, Colt McCoy ( The worst QB in the history of the Browns) was our QB. TO stay with him when we could have had RG3 would have been monumentally stupid. HAd the Browns not picked Weeden, it would have been a hUGE, UNFORGIVABLE MISTAKE to pass on RG3.

Regardless, he is a run-first QB and just like he is already starting to disintegrate in Washington (concussion, fubar knee) he would have self-destructed in Cleveland. Just as Washington will need a new QB in 2016, so too would The Browns need a new QB in 2016 if they chose RG3.

Given Colt? Yes, the Browns would have been nuts not to grab RG3. He is, and always was, a short-term solution. FOr a team that has no QB, like the Browns were at the time, we should have taken RG3 IF we could have.

As it turned out, we drafted Weeden. He isn't flashy but he gets the job done.

RG will not be in the NFL in 2016, nor will Andrew "Pick Six" Luck.

Now, put your pussies away, sit up straight and let me, your superior and mentor teach you idiots something.

This is funny. You should take this act on the road.

Zombo said:

"RG34L" ... "RGIII for Life"?

May be the gayest screen name since "BigBensPenisIsLiterallyInMyColonWhileITypeThis".

Zombo

ROTFLMAO!!! That's a classic.

Zombo said:

"RG34L" ... "RGIII for Life"?

May be the gayest screen name since "BigBensPenisIsLiterallyInMyColonWhileITypeThis".

Zombo

I thought he was Bob's tailor and that that stood for Bob's pants size: Robert Griffin 34 Long.

No?

May be the gayest screen name since "BigBensPenisIsLiterallyInMyColonWhileITypeThis".

Zombo