<![CDATA[No Problem Here]]>http://m.cnsnews.com/news/article/social-security-ran-478b-deficit-fy-2012-disabled-workers-hit-new-record-december

Id post the whole article but for technical difficulties. Anyway, there's no point in overhauling it, its really not that big a deal. 50 billion a year for at least two years and 25 billion before that? Pfft. Chump change.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/25003/no-problem-hereRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 08:54:14 GMTThu, 27 Dec 2012 02:50:14 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:00:14 GMT]]>

@vaportrail said:

They're both economists, are they not?

Nope.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319992https://brownsboard.com/post/319992Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:00:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:20:43 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

Who are the heavy liberals?

Yeah the term is bad, so where are the guys who argued that social security/disability was just fine and didn't need to be reformed? Because it certainly won't be able to go on much longer losing money hand over fist like this every year.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319966https://brownsboard.com/post/319966Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:20:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:09:53 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

I'd venture to say that only to Tupa has much of an understanding.

But I do think that most of us here can see the big picture whether or not you choose to admit it.

WSS

They're both economists, are they not? From what I've gathered, one subscribes to Keynesian theory, the other subscribes to supply-side theory.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319960https://brownsboard.com/post/319960Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:09:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:43:47 GMT]]>

@vaportrail said:

I think heck and tupa are really the only ones who can really put forward intelligent arguments on the fiscal stuff. I'll take quantum physics over trying to understand rates and loopholes any day.

I'd venture to say that only to Tupa has much of an understanding.

But I do think that most of us here can see the big picture whether or not you choose to admit it.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319945https://brownsboard.com/post/319945Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:43:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:14:34 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Good point.

Heck isn't here and some others don't really have enough opinion on record to matter.

WSS

Oh snap I see what you did there.

I'll try to add more generalization s and attacks against liberals and "the 47%"

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319933https://brownsboard.com/post/319933Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:14:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:54:52 GMT]]>I think heck and tupa are really the only ones who can really put forward intelligent arguments on the fiscal stuff. I'll take quantum physics over trying to understand rates and loopholes any day.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319927https://brownsboard.com/post/319927Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:54:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:50:55 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

Who are the heavy liberals?

Good point.

Heck isn't here and some others don't really have enough opinion on record to matter.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319923https://brownsboard.com/post/319923Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:50:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:43:43 GMT]]>Who are the heavy liberals?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319918https://brownsboard.com/post/319918Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:43:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:43:45 GMT]]>I wonder why the heavy liberals have nothing to say about this.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319907https://brownsboard.com/post/319907Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:43:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:24:28 GMT]]>We just keep kicking the can down the road, but it gets heavier with each kick. Soon enough we won't be able to kick it any longer.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319716https://brownsboard.com/post/319716Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:24:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to No Problem Here on Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:02:18 GMT]]> Unfortunately it's a win win for the president and his gang.

The worse the situation gets the more willing his deadbeat constituents ( a good portion of that 47 percent) are to eat the seed corn.

There will always be a few rich people left that they can blame for their own misery.

I think most even realize that we are headed for disaster without some serious cuts.

Unfortunately they are afraid and they really really want to believe that we don't have to.

When it brings on the next depression they can preach that socialism sermon even wilder.

The parent who says no is never the popular one.

Wss

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/319403https://brownsboard.com/post/319403Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:02:18 GMT