<![CDATA[6 Pick]]>was just looking at a few mock drafts and realized that the Browns might have a golden ticket at the 6 spot. They are right in front of Arizona, NYJ & Buffalo, three teams who desperately need QBs. If Geno is gone and teams are looking to jump them we could get a nice set of picks to move down and still get someone need in Dee, Jarvis, Barkevious or even Cordarelle..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/25518/6-pickRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 00:59:55 GMTSat, 16 Feb 2013 12:20:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:37:56 GMT]]>no one thought Ponder would go 12...If Barkley and Wilson have a good 2 months they will be hot commodities,wouldn't be surprised at all if there is a run on 4-5 QB in the top of the draft. Teams are desperate when it comes to QBs and it could pay off nicely for us..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326577https://brownsboard.com/post/326577Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:37:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:16:44 GMT]]>

@comeonman said:

That would be awesome to only move down to nine, and get our 2nd back. Too bad that wont happen. I don't see anyone making moves for a QB in the draft like that, none good enough

I was being facetious and trying to re-create the Sanchez trade but with current players.

I'd take it, though.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326551https://brownsboard.com/post/326551Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:16:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:08:25 GMT]]>No doubt there is always a golden spot to hold. The way you lay it out, it could be #6.

I'd be very happy to trade down this year.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326550https://brownsboard.com/post/326550Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:08:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:05:08 GMT]]>That would be awesome to only move down to nine, and get our 2nd back. Too bad that wont happen. I don't see anyone making moves for a QB in the draft like that, none good enough

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326549https://brownsboard.com/post/326549Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:05:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:13:22 GMT]]>

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

The Jets trade up to 6 and take Matt Barkley, offering us their 9th pick and 41st pick, LaRon Landry, Greg McElroy, and Muhammed Wilkerson.

ALL IN on that one

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326547https://brownsboard.com/post/326547Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:13:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:52:36 GMT]]>The Jets trade up to 6 and take Matt Barkley, offering us their 9th pick and 41st pick, LaRon Landry, Greg McElroy, and Muhammed Wilkerson.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326546https://brownsboard.com/post/326546Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:52:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:18:33 GMT]]>would the Jets trade for our 6th again? Hope they do!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326535https://brownsboard.com/post/326535Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:18:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:45:20 GMT]]>

@badnewsbrowns said:

I don't think anyone will pay a huge bounty because there's not much drop off from the #1 prospect to the #5 prospect at qb.

Just stay at 6 and take the best guy there.

Hell- for all we know the Browns might draft a QB at 6.

Heh

More's the pity.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326534https://brownsboard.com/post/326534Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:45:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 6 Pick on Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:30:18 GMT]]>I don't think anyone will pay a huge bounty because there's not much drop off from the #1 prospect to the #5 prospect at qb.

Just stay at 6 and take the best guy there.

Hell- for all we know the Browns might draft a QB at 6.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/326529https://brownsboard.com/post/326529Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:30:18 GMT