<![CDATA[Plain And Simple]]>So, Steve said that the American Indians' plight was due to liberalism.

Heck whined bullshit and haha and ran away.

I posted this:

***************************************************

"Actually, Steve is CORRECT.

Want to know why ? No, you don't. But I'll happily tell you anyways. The reason liberals are responsible

for the plight of the American Indians is:

Because liberalism attempts, and succeeds with some groups, to create dependency on the government.

That is the only way a liberal/marxist/communist government can thrive and remain in power. Create dependency

on the government. That way you can control them, make them subservient to your wishes, and that's a fact, jack.

The indians ended up being forced by trick or physical force, to a gov reservation. They were totally dependent on the gov

for existence. Their way of life ended. "

*******************************************************

Question for Heck:

Do you think it is wrong - the American Indians' plight has nothing to do with liberalism? Yes...or No ?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/26157/plain-and-simpleRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 04:58:45 GMTFri, 07 Jun 2013 17:17:56 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:54:55 GMT]]>Nah, I don't feel guilty at all. Swing and a miss. I wasn't there. I don't feel guilty about them, and I don't feel guilty about slavery, but thems the facts. We fucked up their lifestyle. End of story.

I feel a little guilty that I thought you were a little less of a douchebag earlier in this thread but as it turns out there was no need. So now I feel better knowing that you're still the same ol' scummy bunker.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/341081https://brownsboard.com/post/341081Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:54:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:52:45 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

Not since we showed up.

Cysco must suffer from American guilt.

To make you feel better, the Etruscan tribes which dominated the area which is known today as Italy, were better off before the Romans vanquished them, and the Gauls were better off before the Germanic Tribes invaded that territory which eventually became France, and the Indians in Central America were better off before the Spainards destroyed them, and the Indians in Canada were better off before the French came....so you see Cysco, there may not even be a country in the world which it's original inhabitans were taken over by some fuckinbody, it was simply the way of the world back then... so just try and deal with it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/341078https://brownsboard.com/post/341078Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:52:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Sat, 08 Jun 2013 18:37:32 GMT]]>Not since we showed up.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/341063https://brownsboard.com/post/341063Sat, 08 Jun 2013 18:37:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Sat, 08 Jun 2013 01:21:52 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

Indians were and are free to leave so long as lthey don't want to live the life of an American Indian. It's not exactly sending astronauts to the moon here.

Frankly it doesn't seem to me that the life of an American Indian is all that sweet.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/341028https://brownsboard.com/post/341028Sat, 08 Jun 2013 01:21:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:12:57 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

Holy shit I partially agree with bunker. What's the world coming to?

It must mean that you're learning...stick with me kid.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/341025https://brownsboard.com/post/341025Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:12:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:04:54 GMT]]>You're surprisingly not offensive when it comes to Indians, bunker. Are you a partial Indian or something?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/341021https://brownsboard.com/post/341021Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:04:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:00:30 GMT]]>

@stewy said:

But I don't think during that time forcing Indians to live on reservations was a liberal ploy to keep them dependent on government..but rather a concerted effort to keep them out of sight and out of mind.

Indians are not forced to live on reservations...they are free to acclimate themselves in our diverse society, and most have.

Today there are 1.2 million that live in urban areas, and only 800,000 on reservations.

The underlying reason for liberals wanting people dependent on government is but one...votes, so I doubt they give a fuck about 2 million Indians. One million Indians do not vote, and registered Indians have the lowest voting turnout of any ethnic group.

Maybe the libs should ship a load of Obamaphones to the reservations.

Holy shit I partially agree with bunker. What's the world coming to?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/341018https://brownsboard.com/post/341018Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:00:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 22:17:31 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

So, Steve said that the American Indians' plight was due to liberalism.

Heck whined bullshit and haha and ran away.

I posted this:

***************************************************

"Actually, Steve is CORRECT.

Want to know why ? No, you don't. But I'll happily tell you anyways. The reason liberals are responsible

for the plight of the American Indians is:

Because liberalism attempts, and succeeds with some groups, to create dependency on the government.

That is the only way a liberal/marxist/communist government can thrive and remain in power. Create dependency

on the government. That way you can control them, make them subservient to your wishes, and that's a fact, jack.

The indians ended up being forced by trick or physical force, to a gov reservation. They were totally dependent on the gov

for existence. Their way of life ended. "

*******************************************************

Question for Heck:

Do you think it is wrong - the American Indians' plight has nothing to do with liberalism? Yes...or No ?

But I don't think during that time forcing Indians to live on reservations was a liberal ploy to keep them dependent on government..but rather a concerted effort to keep them out of sight and out of mind.

Indians are not forced to live on reservations...they are free to acclimate themselves in our diverse society, and most have.

Today there are 1.2 million that live in urban areas, and only 800,000 on reservations.

The underlying reason for liberals wanting people dependent on government is but one...votes, so I doubt they give a fuck about 2 million Indians. One million Indians do not vote, and registered Indians have the lowest voting turnout of any ethnic group.

Maybe the libs should ship a load of Obamaphones to the reservations.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/341005https://brownsboard.com/post/341005Fri, 07 Jun 2013 22:17:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:14:40 GMT]]>I don't even think there were republicans in his day. Pretty sure they were still Whigs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340996https://brownsboard.com/post/340996Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:14:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:05:10 GMT]]>This thread is now about how the Jews orchestrated the 9/11 attacks.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340989https://brownsboard.com/post/340989Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:05:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:18:57 GMT]]>And the Indian wars were fought by numerous presidents both republican and democrat. Also Andrew Jackson was hardly a liberal. In fact he predates the modern democratic party.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340974https://brownsboard.com/post/340974Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:18:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:17:58 GMT]]>Andrew Jackson.... fucking libtard

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340973https://brownsboard.com/post/340973Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:17:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:17:02 GMT]]>Yes I mentioned that in the other thread cal. Way to be tardy to the party

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340972https://brownsboard.com/post/340972Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:17:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:14:33 GMT]]>Well, it all started with President Andrew Jackson. He was a democrat.

**********************************************

"...During the time of President Andrew Jackson and for a period of time afterward, the U.S. government decided that it was necessary to take land away from the Indians, to give it to white settlers who were moving west. The Indians were removed to distant reservations, often on land that was nowhere nearly as good as where they had been living. Needless to say, Jackson's ambitious goals were seen by the Indians as an injustice. But most Americans agreed with Jackson that America needed to expand and they saw westward exploration, and the creation of new states, as a benefit...."
]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340971https://brownsboard.com/post/340971Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:14:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:16:08 GMT]]>Indians were and are free to leave so long as lthey don't want to live the life of an American Indian. It's not exactly sending astronauts to the moon here.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340970https://brownsboard.com/post/340970Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:16:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:12:14 GMT]]>Try to comprehend a little better Steve

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340969https://brownsboard.com/post/340969Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:12:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:06:19 GMT]]>Wait a minute, so nobody forced Indians onto reservations but.....

Republicans did it too?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340966https://brownsboard.com/post/340966Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:06:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:55:18 GMT]]>By the way, nobody MAKES the Indians live in reservations. That's simply their consolation prize for our stealing of their land and destruction of their way of life. The reservations are theoretically places where they are free to continue their lifestyles. They are welcome to live wherever they want so long as they assimilate into their conquerors' society.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340964https://brownsboard.com/post/340964Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:55:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:48:07 GMT]]>Cal, you do know that republicans also forced the Indians onto reservations, don't you? Don't you know that?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340962https://brownsboard.com/post/340962Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:48:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:46:36 GMT]]>So then the conservative is complicit in the destruction of the American Indians. End of sentance.

Oh wait, you mean you want to even take their reservations away from them so they get absolutely nothing out of our systemic genocide of their people. Awesome. Then they'll pull themselves up by their bootstraps, by golly, and get back on the horse. So to speak.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340960https://brownsboard.com/post/340960Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:46:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:42:27 GMT]]>No. We are where we are; there isn't any time machine to be able to go back

and start over. The democratic party could kick out all the progressives, marxist radicals, and libs

out of it though, and deny them the right to vote, and force them to go live on some

"liberal/progressive/marxist/radical reservation" though, to see how THEY like it......

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340958https://brownsboard.com/post/340958Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:42:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:38:52 GMT]]>So, wait, Cal, as a conservative would you be willing to give the American Indians their homelands back?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340957https://brownsboard.com/post/340957Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:38:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:35:52 GMT]]>The fact that the content you want exists doesn't mean its a good source. I'll check them out later, we'll see if they're decent or if they have anything at all to do with what you said

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340954https://brownsboard.com/post/340954Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:35:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Plain And Simple on Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:10:49 GMT]]>There are plenty of sources, believe me.

Read the content of the links, and then realize that Steve

was very correct in what he said.

And Heck's denial "bullshit" was....Bullshit. That's all.

The content of the links doesn't change just because I didn't format the links, Woody.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/340944https://brownsboard.com/post/340944Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:10:49 GMT