<![CDATA[According to Adam Schefter]]>The Browns are listening to trade offers for Gordon and Little. Also the Browns are going to try to sign Ben Tate from Houston in the off season.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/26803/according-to-adam-schefterRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 00:34:38 GMTSun, 22 Sep 2013 14:59:06 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 03:32:50 GMT]]>Seems like LIttle did alright today, just like it was mentioned before, maybe he is better suited as a #3 WR behind Gordon and Bess.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/355037https://brownsboard.com/post/355037Mon, 23 Sep 2013 03:32:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:36:01 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

Oh i suppose we could offer Green Bay 1\2 our defense and all our 2014 draft for Aaron Rodgers, but we're not talking crackhead moves here. 🙂

Yet there have been crackhead offers...

Point is when the phone rings... you pick it up.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/355033https://brownsboard.com/post/355033Mon, 23 Sep 2013 02:36:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 01:02:36 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

Exactly... every player has a price. You never know what someone is willing to give up for a player. So you can never say never.

Bull s**t. Gordon is rapidly proving he has elite talent, off field issues notwithstanding. Go ask the Texans what they want for JJ Watt, and get back to me. You can offer all the tea in China for one of the truly elite qbs, and you'll get laughed off the phone.

Oh i suppose we could offer Green Bay 1\2 our defense and all our 2014 draft for Aaron Rodgers, but we're not talking crackhead moves here. 🙂

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354996https://brownsboard.com/post/354996Mon, 23 Sep 2013 01:02:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:47:45 GMT]]>

@jcam222 said:

Little was dropping balls regularly before Weeden ever arrived. Little sucks period. He is like Braylon Edwards with his thumbs cut off and an eye poked out.

Nobody thinks much of anything of little.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354993https://brownsboard.com/post/354993Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:47:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:45:22 GMT]]>

XxDaBuckeyexX said:

Shopping/entertaining offers....one and the same to me. And that's especially true with this report because now everyone knows he's available.

Do a lot of negotiating do you?

@flyingfooldoug said:

And on 1100 earlier I hear Ban/Lo taking credit for building a good D. and that is what they want to do for the O. Did I miss something?

You mean other than the fact we changed our entire Defensive philosophy?

@hempman said:

I would take 2 first rounders for him. My guess, though, that closes that door.

Exactly... every player has a price. You never know what someone is willing to give up for a player. So you can never say never.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354991https://brownsboard.com/post/354991Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:45:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:31:40 GMT]]>

@jcam222 said:

LOL please for the love of God tell me you are kidding. Elite talent wide receiver for a bust QB?

Yea I was kidding kinda, never said I wanted just pointing out the possibility.]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354986https://brownsboard.com/post/354986Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:31:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:27:31 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

Pretty much no one can catch much out of Weeden. Put the kool aid down

Little was dropping balls regularly before Weeden ever arrived. Little sucks period. He is like Braylon Edwards with his thumbs cut off and an eye poked out.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354985https://brownsboard.com/post/354985Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:27:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:12:18 GMT]]>

@hempman said:

Ball is thrown? Little is terrible vertically. Weeden placed a "Manningesque" terrific pass and Little just dropped it down the seam vs. the Ravens. Hoyer can't make that throw at all.

Little was in the only position that he can play.

Pretty much no one can catch much out of Weeden. Put the kool aid down

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354975https://brownsboard.com/post/354975Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:12:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:07:28 GMT]]>Trading Trich made perfect sense. He has been pedestrian at best. Often his performances are below average. To get a pick anywhere in the first round for him was a coup on our part.

Trading Gordon would not only be stupid from a talent standpoint it would also be revenue suicide. Many fans don't like the Trich trade even though it was a good business move. After today's win and watching Gordon there will be mass mutiny if they move him. I understand the substance abuse issue and it is definitely a concern. It is enough of a concern that we would never get fair value out of him. Fair value based on his talent and performance would have to be top 20 round one. No one is going to take that risk so you have to stand pat and manage him.

I am a very thick skinned Browns fan but I will seriously be tempted to stay home and leave my seats empty if they move him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354968https://brownsboard.com/post/354968Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:07:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:06:22 GMT]]>I can't fathom trading Gordon. He's our best player on offense... makes it almost hilarious that people were saying that about T-Rich and his 2 or 3 yards a carry week after week.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354967https://brownsboard.com/post/354967Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:06:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:03:16 GMT]]>only reason we have Gordon on the trading block is bc of his off the field drug issues. The FO thinks he is a liability in that regard and are banking on him screwing up again. That would THE ONLY reason they are looking to shop him aroun. And I wouldn't take anything less than a 2nd rounder for him. Exactly what we spent to get him. He is a first round talent, so the bargain for the other team is a getting him one round cheaper.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354964https://brownsboard.com/post/354964Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:03:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:01:32 GMT]]>

@poeticg said:

I would try Little out at Runningback, he was one before. He can catch well enough to catch out the backfield like a RB though.

...I don't want Ben Tate....

+1 , not a bad idea at all. As a receiver he is total crap but maybe he could run

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354963https://brownsboard.com/post/354963Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:01:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:59:44 GMT]]>

XxDaBuckeyexX said:

Well its good to know were all watching Countdown. Gordon for Mallett anyone?

LOL please for the love of God tell me you are kidding. Elite talent wide receiver for a bust QB?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354961https://brownsboard.com/post/354961Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:59:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:02:00 GMT]]>notice?

hempman - weeden

like

lumbergh - DA lol

weeds manningesque? BWAHAAA

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354956https://brownsboard.com/post/354956Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:02:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:46:16 GMT]]>

@jafbf said:

Yeah, I was thinking that as well - Hoyer puts more touch on it whereas Weeden seems to drill everything.

I really liked the touch on the lofts into the end zone. Weedon's looked more like a broken wing and a prayer. Hoyer had a much better touch

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354951https://brownsboard.com/post/354951Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:46:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:26:37 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

Yeah, I was thinking that as well - Hoyer puts more touch on it whereas Weeden seems to drill everything.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354933https://brownsboard.com/post/354933Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:26:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:23:21 GMT]]>

@the-cysko-kid said:

You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

Ball is thrown? Little is terrible vertically. Weeden placed a "Manningesque" terrific pass and Little just dropped it down the seam vs. the Ravens. Hoyer can't make that throw at all.

Little was in the only position that he can play.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354929https://brownsboard.com/post/354929Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:23:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:22:01 GMT]]>Gordon is the only reason the Browns won today. Getting in the way of Banner's tanking plans?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354926https://brownsboard.com/post/354926Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:22:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:21:39 GMT]]>

@jafbf said:

Little can't handle being the #1 WR, but as #2/#3 he seems to be functional.

Little wasn't terrible today with Josh back, he caught a few and had a few plays.

You've got to wonder how much of that was how the ball was thrown

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354925https://brownsboard.com/post/354925Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:21:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 22:14:56 GMT]]>

@sundawg said:

Gordon accounted for 168 yards of our 406 total yards on offense, or 41% of our offense. IF they trade him they are complete f#@king incompetents, period.

Yep.

Been saying ever since I saw him that he can be elite if he wants to be.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354891https://brownsboard.com/post/354891Sun, 22 Sep 2013 22:14:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 22:06:16 GMT]]>Gordon accounted for 168 yards of our 406 total yards on offense, or 41% of our offense. IF they trade him they are complete f#@king incompetents, period.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354884https://brownsboard.com/post/354884Sun, 22 Sep 2013 22:06:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:52:42 GMT]]>Little can't handle being the #1 WR, but as #2/#3 he seems to be functional.

Little wasn't terrible today with Josh back, he caught a few and had a few plays.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354868https://brownsboard.com/post/354868Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:52:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:48:30 GMT]]>I would be EXTREMELY disappointed if they trade Gordon. This team won't win a game beyond that point.

Who wants Little, seriously? He's quickly disappearing from this offense's plans.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354865https://brownsboard.com/post/354865Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:48:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to According to Adam Schefter on Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:48:15 GMT]]>From MKC:

Josh Gordon on if he was making the statement 'don't trade me': "it was kind of that sense."

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/354864https://brownsboard.com/post/354864Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:48:15 GMT