<![CDATA[Campell to start]]>Chud Said it in the press conference. Weeden is done.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/27144/campell-to-startRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 21:08:24 GMTWed, 23 Oct 2013 14:55:18 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Fri, 25 Oct 2013 05:32:32 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

I know ... everybody looks good in highlights. But humor me.

He's the only Oakland starting QB to have a winning record (11-7) in the past ten years.

If you can win in Oakland, you can win in ... Cleveland?

dude let's not talk oakland vs. cleveland which was supposed to be one of the biggest (NE snow vs. cali sunshine) lop-sided victories in our favor..................

30+ years later and i'm still waitin on the dan fouts, roman gabriel, joe kapp motherfuckers to just be a fuckin man.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363062https://brownsboard.com/post/363062Fri, 25 Oct 2013 05:32:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Fri, 25 Oct 2013 02:48:47 GMT]]>

@miktoxic said:

don't forget the info about campbell's contract.

i think the FO would have stuck with weeds if the fan-base wasn't screaming for his benching.

I don't think they listen to us. Its a money thing Not talking about Campbell's contract but Haslem wants a product that makes money You can't do that with Weeden playing. Campbell will put people in the seats and people to watch on TV.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363042https://brownsboard.com/post/363042Fri, 25 Oct 2013 02:48:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:21:12 GMT]]>

@typicalbrowns said:

A glimmer is better than what weve had the past 3 games

is a glimmer like sequins on michael jackson's shoes/jacket or like a spit-shine on a marine's boot?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363027https://brownsboard.com/post/363027Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:21:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:28:10 GMT]]>A glimmer is better than what weve had the past 3 games

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362963https://brownsboard.com/post/362963Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:28:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 06:00:33 GMT]]>I can sleep at night with a glimmer of hope now thanks Jason.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362947https://brownsboard.com/post/362947Thu, 24 Oct 2013 06:00:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 04:03:56 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

I know ... everybody looks good in highlights. But humor me.

He's the only Oakland starting QB to have a winning record (11-7) in the past ten years.

If you can win in Oakland, you can win in ... Cleveland?

OMG that's what a real qb is supposed to look like. 🙂 What I took from that video- Campbell has 10x the pocket awareness than Weeds, he throws an accurate ball with someone in his face, knows how to throw a fade, actually sees guys that are wide open, fairly quick release.

Was it Chud's & the coaching staff's plan to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt Weeden as a first round pick was a total bust? Case closed. (Hey you Banner cheapskate theorists- maybe Joe wanted to play Weeden because he wanted to get his money's worth out of him, LOL!!!) If Campbell looked 1\2 that good in practice, I can't understand why he didn't get the nod to come in when Hoyer went down.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362942https://brownsboard.com/post/362942Thu, 24 Oct 2013 04:03:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:59:54 GMT]]>I am actually that fuktard in not playing. Give me a Campbell tomato soup instead of a stale ginger bread cookie any day. Campbell give us our best chance to win you idiots. b

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362940https://brownsboard.com/post/362940Thu, 24 Oct 2013 03:59:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Fri, 25 Oct 2013 01:48:13 GMT]]>

@gips said:

The team and fans needed to see this change, now we have to hope campbell can survive against a very hostile defense or we will unfortunately see weeds again..

Honestly i would rather see us sign some no name as a backup and waive weeden..

Gips rises from the dead! what brings you back? A lifetime ban from the WNBA 's Indy Fever board? 🤔

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362935https://brownsboard.com/post/362935Fri, 25 Oct 2013 01:48:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 01:55:44 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

It gives me faint hope I may actually witness something resembling a Browns offense this week in KC.

Oh, christ I hope we don't see anything resembling a Browns offense this week

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362934https://brownsboard.com/post/362934Thu, 24 Oct 2013 01:55:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 01:27:25 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

I know ... everybody looks good in highlights. But humor me.

He's the only Oakland starting QB to have a winning record (11-7) in the past ten years.

If you can win in Oakland, you can win in ... Cleveland?

THanks for the video. Got me excited for this weekend's game. I hope he still has the wheels b/c he's gonna need them...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362931https://brownsboard.com/post/362931Thu, 24 Oct 2013 01:27:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 01:22:13 GMT]]>

@usfbrown said:

Weeden is toast.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362929https://brownsboard.com/post/362929Thu, 24 Oct 2013 01:22:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:18:00 GMT]]>If I had Photoshop, I would have pasted Campbell's head where the wife's is.

Anyway, CLE has no excuses to lose at home to JAC, at least. It's worth noting that Campbell's older than Weeden, with less coaching stability.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362909https://brownsboard.com/post/362909Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:18:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:12:34 GMT]]>More Campbells:

campbell-soup.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362906https://brownsboard.com/post/362906Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:12:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:02:35 GMT]]>Just remember...no matter how good/bad camphell does...he's nothing more than a stopgap QB...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362902https://brownsboard.com/post/362902Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:02:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:30:21 GMT]]>If we win it just shows that the team is good and that BW just sucked the life out of the team. Any decent QB would be an improvement over old man Weeden.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362897https://brownsboard.com/post/362897Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:30:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:33:58 GMT]]>I know ... everybody looks good in highlights. But humor me.

He's the only Oakland starting QB to have a winning record (11-7) in the past ten years.

If you can win in Oakland, you can win in ... Cleveland?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362895https://brownsboard.com/post/362895Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:33:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:22:31 GMT]]>don't forget the info about campbell's contract.

i think the FO would have stuck with weeds if the fan-base wasn't screaming for his benching.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362893https://brownsboard.com/post/362893Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:22:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:14:52 GMT]]>

@bonedawg said:

I'm not campaigning for Weeden nor do I think that Oakland and Washington are model franchises for a QB to function in, what I am saying is that if he really had something, he already had opportunities to show it.

He showed he is average and mildly competent.

That is a huge upgrade.

The future of this franchise is "21" ... the 21st starter since 1999. Campbell is "20". If he can hold the fort down without being Weedenesque I think we will all be happy with that right now.

Zombo

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362892https://brownsboard.com/post/362892Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:14:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:04:23 GMT]]>

@usfbrown said:

I don't think he failed in Oakland, rather he got injured. I believe he was 4-2 which was a big improvement for them. We just need a serviceable QB to be competitive/watchable. If Weeden was to start again, i would be mowing the lawn, playing with my kid, or something else instead of getting mad at terrible football every Sunday. Weeden is toast.

I'm not campaigning for Weeden nor do I think that Oakland and Washington are model franchises for a QB to function in, what I am saying is that if he really had something, he already had opportunities to show it. In the great words of Marcellus Wallace, "You came close but you never made it. And if you were gonna make it, you would have made it before now."

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362888https://brownsboard.com/post/362888Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:04:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:52:57 GMT]]>I think Weeden is the shit, guys! Campbell ain't got nothin on Weeds.

Seriously, I watched the first couple of possessions last week and turned the game off. I had never done that before. I am ashamed to say that I did it last week. Weeden makes football suck to watch. I watch him play and can only think of how badly I want to kick him in the balls. He will get booted out of Cleveland, and I promise you, he will give the same speech his non-ginger brother gave about how the fans suck and booed him when he got hurt. Fuck you Weeden and fuck you Derek Weeden!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362885https://brownsboard.com/post/362885Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:52:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:41:58 GMT]]>I dont think shanahan ever had campbell... I think he started with grossman and mcnabb. campbell was apart of those akward jim zorn years. maybe even joe gibbs years

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362884https://brownsboard.com/post/362884Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:41:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:19:54 GMT]]>

@usfbrown said:

I don't think he failed in Oakland, rather he got injured. I believe he was 4-2 which was a big improvement for them. We just need a serviceable QB to be competitive/watchable. If Weeden was to start again, i would be mowing the lawn, playing with my kid, or something else instead of getting mad at terrible football every Sunday. Weeden is toast.

i agree, what i saw of him (prob more than you guysbeing in the NFC east tv market) i liked him. he wasn't great but he sure had a better showing then than what i see now of weeden. shanahan didn't know squat. wanted a different guy and their team basically sucked. you can't put that all on campbell.

hey at least the FO heard us and we know have to take our medicine. either it makes us better or we know we are dead.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362883https://brownsboard.com/post/362883Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:19:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:59:57 GMT]]>I think norv will have more of a playbook with Campbell in. I used to watch him as a redskin. he wasnt awful. just average the team around him generally lost games.

at worst I think norv can tailor fit something for campbell to work to his assets. especially after a long bye week to put a plan together.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362879https://brownsboard.com/post/362879Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:59:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campell to start on Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:37:57 GMT]]>

@bonedawg said:

Wheezy will look great holding a clipboard somewhere. I'd be more excited if we had some rookie coming in to take a shot over Campbell. We know what that guy has, he's failed in Washington, and again in Oakland yet we expect a different outcome in Cleveland? Truth is, we win about the same number of games with Campbell as we would have with Weeden.

I don't think he failed in Oakland, rather he got injured. I believe he was 4-2 which was a big improvement for them. We just need a serviceable QB to be competitive/watchable. If Weeden was to start again, i would be mowing the lawn, playing with my kid, or something else instead of getting mad at terrible football every Sunday. Weeden is toast.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/362877https://brownsboard.com/post/362877Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:37:57 GMT