<![CDATA[Campbell stats]]>Here are just some statistics in Jason Campbell's career:

31-40 record as a starting QB

1329/2186 for a 60.8 completion pct

14,688 yards

76 TD 3.5 TD%

52 Ints 2.4 Int. %

yards/attempt 6.7

yards/completion 11.1

yard/game avg 188.3

Rating 86.4

153 sacks for 992 yards lost

6.5% sack rate

Has 7 4th Quarter comebacks

Has 10 Game winning drives

The stats seem fair......a little to high on the sacks though. Maybe he has had real bad o-lines.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/27167/campbell-statsRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 00:55:28 GMTFri, 25 Oct 2013 19:12:25 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:22:43 GMT]]>

Zombo said:

He looks healthy with a good arm and good wheels, quicker release and better pocket awareness than Captain Shovelpass.

I just wish Weeden would have sucked in the preseason so that it could have been Campbell/Hoyer all year and we would be up there at the top of the division.

Zombo

The other teams played us light so we would be irrelevant with Weeden

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/364173https://brownsboard.com/post/364173Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:22:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:36:30 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

After further review of Jason's one game... Sorry, but I still say he comes up "shot". His game was no where near as good as his stats.

We'll see what he does the rest of the way...

I think he started off slow due to not getting many snaps since his injury in Oakland. I was pretty impressed with how he played for the most part. Hoping he can lead us to the W against Baltimore.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/364166https://brownsboard.com/post/364166Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:36:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:25:14 GMT]]>Any comparison to Wheezy is ludicrous... Wheezy makes 'em all look good.

After further review of Jason's one game... Sorry, but I still say he comes up "shot". His game was no where near as good as his stats.

We'll see what he does the rest of the way...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/364161https://brownsboard.com/post/364161Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:25:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:24:50 GMT]]>Fuck Brandon Weeden.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363912https://brownsboard.com/post/363912Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:24:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:08:02 GMT]]>

@mark-o said:

It is amazing how the o-line looked horrible against Miami and Baltimore, then suddenly improved against Minnesota and Cincy only to suck again against Detroit and Green Bay and then suddenly they look good again yesterday against KC.

What the common denominator when the line looks like shit? Could it be a shitty QB who stares down receivers and holds the ball too long?

Hmmmm....let me think... 😛

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363845https://brownsboard.com/post/363845Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:08:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:07:20 GMT]]>

@jrb12711 said:

Campbell obviously wasn't Manning out there but he's days better than Weeden dreams to be. He did things crazy like hit open WR's and move around slighlty in the pocket to extend plays. Who knew that was possible! He's not the franchise QB but he certainly played above average against a top tier defense.

He definitely wasn't Manning but, in my honest opinion, he showed everyone that with him under center instead of...well...you know who...we could hope for a .500 season this year.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363844https://brownsboard.com/post/363844Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:07:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:08:58 GMT]]>It is amazing how the o-line looked horrible against Miami and Baltimore, then suddenly improved against Minnesota and Cincy only to suck again against Detroit and Green Bay and then suddenly they look good again yesterday against KC.

What the common denominator when the line looks like shit? Could it be a shitty QB who stares down receivers and holds the ball too long?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363668https://brownsboard.com/post/363668Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:08:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:40:27 GMT]]>Campbell looked good. He is what he is, a competent "dirty starter" or valuable backup in this league. He could have some very real trade value since I do believe that role belongs to Brian Hoyer next year. We could get a player for him from a QB starved team in the offseason.

But I thought it was almost funny (again) that Chud said the Browns line had their best game as far as pass protection against a lethal Chiefs pass rush. Hmm. Wonder why?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363662https://brownsboard.com/post/363662Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:40:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:59:18 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

No... Campbell is shot.

He was done physically when Washington was through with him.... and then came the Silver and Black abuse...

Any remaining emotional spark was snuffed out when he was passed over for Hoyer.

I don't know what game you watched (maybe highlights from McCoy's college days)?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363641https://brownsboard.com/post/363641Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:59:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:56:02 GMT]]>Campbell obviously wasn't Manning out there but he's days better than Weeden dreams to be. He did things crazy like hit open WR's and move around slighlty in the pocket to extend plays. Who knew that was possible! He's not the franchise QB but he certainly played above average against a top tier defense.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363639https://brownsboard.com/post/363639Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:56:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:52:32 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

So, if Campbell threw for a 60% completion rate and 188 yards and 1.07 TDs and .73 ints, and took 2.15 sacks for 13.97 yards in losses would you be happy?

So....what we got was Campbell throwing for 61.1% (22/36) for 293 yards. 2 TDs, -0- Ints, 1 sack for 10 yards.

You cannot say based on pure stats that he didn't perform well. He did pretty damn good.

But he had no run game to speak of. Browns had 57 yards rushing compared to Chiefs 136. That does not help.

Plus apparently Bess was also playing for the opposition...so playing 10 men on 12 is tough.

Plus, the Browns were 3/12 in 3rd down opportunities. That IS pretty suckass.

Also, but the defense did no real great shakes....allowing the Chiefs to go 10/19 on third downs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363638https://brownsboard.com/post/363638Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:52:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:08:35 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

No... Campbell is shot.

He was done physically when Washington was through with him.... and then came the Silver and Black abuse...

Any remaining emotional spark was snuffed out when he was passed over for Hoyer.

As stated before we knew anything about how well Hoyer would play i told you campbell would be a very good game manager and give us a chance to win. the guy is far from shot.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363607https://brownsboard.com/post/363607Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:08:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:35:28 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

based on one game, Campbell looks far from shot. Not the long term guy- but he's WAY better than anything Weeden can give us.

He looks healthy with a good arm and good wheels, quicker release and better pocket awareness than Captain Shovelpass.

I just wish Weeden would have sucked in the preseason so that it could have been Campbell/Hoyer all year and we would be up there at the top of the division.

Zombo

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363603https://brownsboard.com/post/363603Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:35:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:30:30 GMT]]>

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

It's sad to say, but I'd take 7-5.

That's still 2 more wins than Weeden has had in his entire career.

based on one game, Campbell looks far from shot. Not the long term guy- but he's WAY better than anything Weeden can give us.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363600https://brownsboard.com/post/363600Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:30:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:17:29 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

Yup 4-2 in 2011 after being 7-5 in 2010...

He was asked to be the next Al Davis "mad bomber" behind a bad O-line.

In 2010 he set personal highs for:

  • YPC and YPA;
  • rushing attempts per game;
  • rushing YPG;
  • sacks per game.
In 2011 his only best was for broken collar bones per season...It's sad to say, but I'd take 7-5.

That's still 2 more wins than Weeden has had in his entire career.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363345https://brownsboard.com/post/363345Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:17:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Sun, 27 Oct 2013 03:33:34 GMT]]>

@mark-o said:

He was 4-2 being "abused" by the silver and black. Not sure how that translates to being done. I'd be thrilled with a QB that could get us to 4-2.

Yup 4-2 in 2011 after being 7-5 in 2010...

He was asked to be the next Al Davis "mad bomber" behind a bad O-line.

In 2010 he set personal highs for:

  • YPC and YPA;
  • rushing attempts per game;
  • rushing YPG;
  • sacks per game.

In 2011 his only best was for broken collar bones per season...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363318https://brownsboard.com/post/363318Sun, 27 Oct 2013 03:33:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:36:19 GMT]]>

@mark-o said:

He was 4-2 being "abused" by the silver and black. Not sure how that translates to being done. I'd be thrilled with a QB that could get us to 4-2.

Absolutely, I would be happy if in our next 6 games he gave us 4 and 2

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363296https://brownsboard.com/post/363296Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:36:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:28:23 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

No... Campbell is shot.

He was done physically when Washington was through with him.... and then came the Silver and Black abuse...

Any remaining emotional spark was snuffed out when he was passed over for Hoyer.

He was 4-2 being "abused" by the silver and black. Not sure how that translates to being done. I'd be thrilled with a QB that could get us to 4-2.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363295https://brownsboard.com/post/363295Sat, 26 Oct 2013 22:28:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:54:06 GMT]]>

@topdawg31 said:

Campbell was doing pretty good before the browns broke his shoulder. I am hoping he can return to being a decent QB. Can we catch lightning in a bottle twice in one season?

No... Campbell is shot.

He was done physically when Washington was through with him.... and then came the Silver and Black abuse...

Any remaining emotional spark was snuffed out when he was passed over for Hoyer.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363291https://brownsboard.com/post/363291Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:54:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Sat, 26 Oct 2013 05:27:41 GMT]]>

@tim-couch-pulls-out said:

It wouldn't be catching lightning in a bottle twice. It would be proving that we have enough offensive talent for any jackass with half a brain to play QB, which I think is the case.

Not that Hoyer is a jackass. I think he has the qualities of a franchise QB, personally.

But Weeden is just a useless chode.

The test comes Sunday- Campbell hasn't seen live bullets in a long time- and facing the team leading the league in sacks may not exactly be a fair estimation of how good (or not) he is. Weeden got every chance in the world to prove he totally sucks. Jason deserves more than one game.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363239https://brownsboard.com/post/363239Sat, 26 Oct 2013 05:27:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:35:41 GMT]]>

@topdawg31 said:

Campbell was doing pretty good before the browns broke his shoulder. I am hoping he can return to being a decent QB. Can we catch lightning in a bottle twice in one season?

It wouldn't be catching lightning in a bottle twice. It would be proving that we have enough offensive talent for any jackass with half a brain to play QB, which I think is the case.

Not that Hoyer is a jackass. I think he has the qualities of a franchise QB, personally.

But Weeden is just a useless chode.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363230https://brownsboard.com/post/363230Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:35:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Fri, 25 Oct 2013 21:25:37 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

Here are just some statistics in Jason Campbell's career:

31-40 record as a starting QB

1329/2186 for a 60.8 completion pct

14,688 yards

76 TD 3.5 TD%

52 Ints 2.4 Int. %

yards/attempt 6.7

yards/completion 11.1

yard/game avg 188.3

Rating 86.4

153 sacks for 992 yards lost

6.5% sack rate

Has 7 4th Quarter comebacks

Has 10 Game winning drives

The stats seem fair......a little to high on the sacks though. Maybe he has had real bad o-lines.

Campbell was doing pretty good before the browns broke his shoulder. I am hoping he can return to being a decent QB. Can we catch lightning in a bottle twice in one season?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363204https://brownsboard.com/post/363204Fri, 25 Oct 2013 21:25:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:33:23 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

So, if Campbell threw for a 60% completion rate and 188 yards and 1.07 TDs and .73 ints, and took 2.15 sacks for 13.97 yards in losses would you be happy?

Yes, if we win.

I will be thrilled.

Zombo

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363196https://brownsboard.com/post/363196Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:33:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Campbell stats on Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:02:43 GMT]]>So, if Campbell threw for a 60% completion rate and 188 yards and 1.07 TDs and .73 ints, and took 2.15 sacks for 13.97 yards in losses would you be happy?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/363184https://brownsboard.com/post/363184Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:02:43 GMT