<![CDATA[Oakland]]>Right before our very eyes.....Do they even have a coach yet? Al needs to be dismissed on diminishing mental skills~ Sad. Really what coach would want that job? Any rumors to who will be coach,coordinators? 🙁

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/2741/oaklandRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 08:03:42 GMTThu, 29 Jan 2009 00:55:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:47:58 GMT]]>

@socalbrownsfan said:

When has Al had any cognitive skillls? The guy is a nut job.

He looks like Skeletor, with a Raider jacket on. 😛

ha ha ha ha

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38703https://brownsboard.com/post/38703Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:47:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:09:09 GMT]]>]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38686https://brownsboard.com/post/38686Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:09:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:51:34 GMT]]>I am sure you weren't being malicious, but you either die young or end up looking like that.

There really is no other way. Death is always a ugly process.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38680https://brownsboard.com/post/38680Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:51:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:41:15 GMT]]>When has Al had any cognitive skillls? The guy is a nut job.

He looks like Skeletor, with a Raider jacket on. 😛

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38675https://brownsboard.com/post/38675Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:41:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:26:08 GMT]]>Cable?? again...sad!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38672https://brownsboard.com/post/38672Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:26:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:19:58 GMT]]>Looks like Cable will be staying with them

Per ESPN: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3867478

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38669https://brownsboard.com/post/38669Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:19:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:15:00 GMT]]>it doesn't really matter who he's looking at. he's unfit to run the team and needs to be moved to a purely ceremonial role, a figurehead. the other owners need to make it happen to ensure that davis doesn't destroy the legacy that he himself built.

if there's no provision for removing an owner from office because it's in the best interest of the team and the league, then goodell needs to write one into the league bylaws.

raider fans deserve better than this.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38668https://brownsboard.com/post/38668Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:15:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:11:41 GMT]]>Maybe hes looking at a PIT or ARI assistant?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38666https://brownsboard.com/post/38666Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:11:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Oakland on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:03:48 GMT]]>I really don't know if there are any provisions to do that.

I agree....Al has tested the league for a long time as a AFL sore loser....but he has been good for the NFL.

It is never fun to see a person near the end making stupid decisions....like him or not....a good number of us are going to be in the same boat, be it 10 years or 50 years. That is just the way life turns. You can't turn it off...that time clicker keeps moving and we all end up at the final click.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/38664https://brownsboard.com/post/38664Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:03:48 GMT