<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Franchise and transition tags now known]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The official 2009 Franchise and Transition Tag tender numbers are now known.</p>



<p>
To refresh how tenders are established, a Franchise tender is an amount equal to the average of the top five salaries (salary plus other prorated amounts) at that position from the 2008 season. A Transition tender is an amount equal to the average of the top 10 salaries (salary plus other prorated amounts) at that position from the 2008 season. Once a player accepts the tender, the amount is fully guaranteed for the year.</p>



<p>
As we approach the tagging period of Feb. 5-19, here are the official numbers, in millions rounded to the nearest ten thousand, with notes about the players and calculations leading to the numbers:</p>





<p>
Position Franchise Transition</p>

<p>
Quarterback $14.65 $12.44</p>



<p>
This group is led by Peyton Manning’s 2008 number of $18.7M, followed by two players who played little in 2008, Tom Brady at $14.6M and Carson Palmer at $14M. The next two quarterbacks played together for three years, with Aaron Rodgers and his new 2008 Cap-heavy deal at $13.9M and Brett Favre at $12M. Our strong belief is that Matt Cassel will have the Franchise tag applied to him, making his 2009 Cap number very similar to that of Brady in 2008.</p>



<p>
Cornerback $9.96 $8.37</p>



<p>
This number was set by a couple of underperformers in 2008, with Chris McAlister – likely to soon be an ex-Baltimore Raven – at $10.9M , following only Champ Bailey at $12.2M. Nnamdi Ashomugha was franchised in 2008 at $9.765M and is hoping he’s not tagged again. The Raiders’ Cap problems may help his cause.</p>



<p>
Wide Receiver $9.88 $8.39</p>



<p>
The Colts have the first and 10th numbers in this group, with Marvin Harrison leading the way at $12M and Reggie Wayne 10th at $6.7M. Others setting the pace in this group include Lee Evans and his new 2008 Cap-heavy deal at $10.4M and Vikings free agent signee Bernard Berrian at $9.4M.</p>



<p>
Defensive End $8.99 $7.78</p>



<p>
Julius Peppers is front and center here, with a 2008 Cap number of $13.9M (meaning if he is franchised, his number will not be the one above but rather 20 percent above his 2008 number, or a prohibitive $16.7M). Others in the group setting these numbers include Jason Taylor, whose future is unclear in Washington or anywhere else, at $7.5M and John Abraham at $8.5M.</p>



<p>
Offensive Line $8.45 $7.74</p>



<p>
The top two 2008 numbers here went to Cleveland Browns, both being 2007 signings, one a marquee free-agent signing (Eric Steinbach at $9.2M) and one a top draft choice (Joe Thomas at $8.9M). Others include perennial All-Pros Walter Jones ($8.6M) and Orlando Pace ($8.2M). Jordan Gross played on a Franchise tag in 2008 at $7.455M and may be there again at a 20-percent increase to $8.95M.</p>



<p>
Linebacker $8.3 $7.48</p>



<p>
Like the offensive lineman, the top two 2008 numbers setting this pace were from the same team, with Ray Lewis ($9.4M) and franchised-Terrell Suggs ($8.475M) of the Ravens holding the highest numbers. Suggs’ number was the result of a settled arbitration that determined whether he should be treated as a linebacker or defensive end. Interestingly, both players are going to be free agents pending decisions by the Ravens, a team with Cap issues.</p>



<p>
Running Back $6.62 $5.92</p>



<p>
The top three numbers here from 2008 all have insecure futures: LaDanian Tomlinson ($7.8M), Edgerrin James ($6.8M) and Jamal Lewis ($6.4M). It will be interesting to see the changes in those numbers in 2009, as well as other vulnerable top 2008 numbers like Larry Johnson ($5.7M) and Deuce McAlister ($4.9M).</p>



<p>
Safety $6.34 $5.13</p>



<p>
This is another group with some high 2008 numbers that are questions marks for 2009, including Roy Williams ($6.7M) and Darren Sharper ($4.15M). Bob Sanders’ number of $8.2M led the pack.</p>



<p>
Defensive Tackle $6.06 $5.45</p>



<p>
Albert Haynesworth’s 2008 Franchise number of $7.25M led the group last year and will likely lead again in 2009, although under a new contract since the Titans lost the privilege to tag him again based on his 2008 contract. There were not a lot of high numbers here, although that will change in 2009 when option/roster bonuses kick in for players such as the Browns’ duo of Corey Williams and Shaun Rogers.</p>



<p>
Tight End $4.46 $4.07</p>



<p>
This is traditionally a number that provides good value to a team if there’s a player worthy of the tag. Tony Gonzalez was the only player at or above $5M in 2008.</p>



<p>
Punter/Kicker $2.48 $2.26</p>


<p>
Another good value for a tag, with Sebastian Janikowski the only 2008 number over $3M.</p>


<p>
There’s much more ahead in the coming weeks as we analyze the decision-making of teams in choosing whether to apply these tenders.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/2755/franchise-and-transition-tags-now-known</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:53:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/2755.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:24:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Franchise and transition tags now known on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:55:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aloysius <a href="/post/38823">said</a>:</p>Safety's a bit more expensive than I thought it would be. Not sure we'd be willing to give Sean Jones $6.34 million to see if he can earn a long-term deal.</blockquote>

<p>
I agree...even the low tag seems high....</p>

<p>
Well..we drafted him...we might get a compensatory pick for him next year....depending on what we sign and whoever else we might lose.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/38837</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/38837</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ballpeen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:55:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Franchise and transition tags now known on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:35:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aloysius <a href="/post/38823">said</a>:</p>Safety's a bit more expensive than I thought it would be. Not sure we'd be willing to give Sean Jones $6.34 million to see if he can earn a long-term deal.</blockquote>

<p>
I was thinking the same exact thing.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/38824</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/38824</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mz.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:35:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Franchise and transition tags now known on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:33:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Safety's a bit more expensive than I thought it would be. Not sure we'd be willing to give Sean Jones $6.34 million to see if he can earn a long-term deal.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/38823</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/38823</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aloysius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:33:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>